ACLU: Jesus, Please Leave the Courtroom

by Jordan Yerman | July 30, 2007 at 01:20 pm
641 views | 0 Recommendations | 0 comments

Photos

The Greatest Love

The Greatest Love

see larger image

uploaded by dm144

A small painting of Jesus Christ,which hung for years in a Louisiana courtroom, has become the latest token in an ongoing struggle over the presence of faith in civic life. Muddying the waters are the throwing around of terms like "Taliban" and "terrorist", but this looks like a battle that may, in part, be taken up as a response to the ever-growing presence of faith in public government life: this painting may not be the actual target, but a symbol thereof.

The American Civil Liberties Union sued Judge Jim Lamz of Slidell, La., earlier this month for refusing to take down a portrait of Jesus Christ above the words "To know peace, obey these laws" displayed in a courthouse lobby. The judge says he believes the picture is legal, and the mayor of the city — the mayor and the town are also named in the lawsuit — called the ACLU "America's Taliban."


The case began when a man walked into the Slidell courthouse earlier this year and saw the portrait, which has hung there for a decade.


The man, who is insisting on anonymity because of the nature of the case, is named in the suit as "John Doe." In his first media interview since jointly filing the lawsuit with the ACLU on July 3, the man told ABC News about his encounter with the display.


"You go in the courthouse, and you can't miss it," he said. "And I'm thinking, 'This is a court of law and they're blatantly disobeying the law with a religious symbol.'"


The town is represented in the suit by the Christian-inspired Alliance Defense Fund, which might be called the right-wing version of the ACLU.


"[The ACLU is] one of the worst attackers of religious speech in America," Gary McCaleb, senior legal counsel for the ADF, told ABC News.


Court fights over religious symbols on public property are a cottage industry in America, from Christmas displays on town greens to judges who post the Ten Commandments in their courtroom. At the heart of these fights are the First Amendment's famous first 10 words, known as the Establishment Clause.


The words — "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" — seem pretty plain, but they are anything but to the parties involved in a legal scrap like the one in Slidell. And, with a decidedly right-leaning Supreme Court sitting in Washington, there is new zeal among groups like ADF to pursue such cases.

What do you think? Is a painting sometimes just a painting, or is a portrait like this really a symbol of a larger issue?

Advertisement

Comments (0)

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from