Al Roker on Don Imus

by toastie | April 10, 2007 at 11:39 am
3740 views | 5 Recommendations | 6 comments

Photos

Al Roker

Al Roker

see larger image

uploaded by NYCArthur

I am naive. I honestly didn't even know what "nappy-headed" meant until the Imus comments. I've never used the term, but I wouldn't have known it was racist. So my initial reaction to the Imus firestorm was that he had made an offensive comment, but what was really the big deal, considering his tendency to be a frequent offender of a wide-range of people and groups.


But with all the attention given to the issue in recent days, I now appreciate what the comment means and how hurtful it is. I think Al Roker's blog speaks well to the issue. You don't normally associate Al Roker with serious commentary, so when he has something to say, it's worth noting.



I cannot tell you how many people have asked me about my thoughts on Don Imus. As a student of broadcasting, I know Don Imus was one of the original “shock jocks.” I listened to him growing up in New York City in the late '60s and early '70s.


He is a radio icon.


That said, it is time for him to go.


I, for one, am really tired of the diatribes, the “humor” at others’ expense, the cruelty that passes for “funny”. Don Imus isn’t the only one doing this, but today he’s the one in the hot seat.


What he said was vile and disgusting. It denigrated an entire team and by extension, a community and its pride in a group that had excelled.


This controversy started and grew during the week. At first under the radar, we even had Don’s wife, Deidre, on the program, talking about “green” cleaning. I thought she was so good I wanted to talk to her about a television program for my production company.


Don and his wife have done a lot of good things—raising money for charity, including a ranch for children suffering from cancer and blood disorders.


Yet, Don Imus needs to be fired for what he said. And while we’re at it, his producer, Bernard McGuirk, needs to be canned as well. McGuirk is just as guilty, often egging Imus on.


The “I’m a good person who said a bad thing” apology doesn’t cut it. At least he didn’t try to weasel out of this by hiding behind alcohol or drug abuse. Still, he said it and a two-week suspension doesn’t cut it. It is, at best, a slap on the wrist. A vacation. Nothing.


The general manager of Cartoon Network resigned after a publicity stunt went wrong and caused a panic in Boston. He did the right thing. Don Imus should do the right thing and resign. Not talk about taking a two-week suspension with dignity. I don’t think Don Imus gets it.


After watching and listening to him this morning during an interview with Matt Lauer (video), Don Imus doesn’t get it. Maybe it’s being stuck in a studio for 35 years or being stuck in the 1980s. Either way, it’s obvious that he needs to move on. Citing “context within a comedy show” is not an excuse.


He has to take his punishment and start over. Guess what? He’ll get re-hired and we’ll go on like nothing happened. CBS Radio and NBC News needs to remove Don Imus from the airwaves. That is what needs to happen. Otherwise, it just looks like profits and ratings rule over decency and justice.
Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
Kaitlin
Kaitlin
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:30 on April 10th, 2007

Great work, toastie. It's good to hear from someone who is a broadcaster and an African-American on this issue. Roker's response is a classy one, for sure. Wonder how this will turn out...

0
NYCArthur

I don't think Imus is so important that he deserves all this attention.

If the girls/champions would have commented that Imus is a jerk, and not worth any attention they'd be right.  All this media attention just gives Imus publicity - he's not going away.  His comment is offensive, tasteless, rude and just plain stupid and offensive - for the girls to be offended by his rediculous comment is absurd - He's the one who should be embarrassed and offended by his own remark.

 I hate to hear the Victorious Champions acting like Imus's victims.  They are NOT victims they are champions.

I've never watched or listened to Imus but a few times... now maybe I'll check him out, if just to watch for his next gaff... nah - I just can't stand his voice. 

0
toastie

With respect to NYCArthur's comments, it doesn't matter whether we give Imus further attention now or not, because it's too late for the Rutgers women. They will forvever be linked with Imus's comments. Why? Because, honestly, women's college basketball doesn't have a huge following, so a lot of people out there probably didn't even know about the Rutgers women's basketball team. Now, everyone does, and I hope most appreciate their athletic and scholastic abilities, but the phrase "nappy-headed hos" is going to pop up, even if people realize how repugnant it is. I'm sure Elizabeth Smart from Utah would like be known as Elizabeth Smart, the kind, intelligent girl who likes to study <whatever> and would like to be a <whatever> someday. Unfortunately, people know Elizabeth Smart as that pretty blond teen who was molested by a bunch of wackos.

No one can choose whether or not to be a victim. They can choose how to handle it, and I think the Rutgers women are handling it with a lot of class. They could have brushed it off and ignored it, but they're choosing to raise awareness of the issue of racism that still exists. Just because the restaurants serve them and they get first-class accomodations when they play in a tournament doesn't mean there are people saying behind their backs, "Hey, look at those nappy-headed hos". And, Imus aside, we as a society have to deal with that whether we like it or not.

Imus is NOT so important...talking about his remarks is.

0
nappyco

Nappy is not an insult. Calling a team of young college girls at the hieght of thier achievements, HO's is the insult here.

BUt somehow the Ho part has be lost in this conversation. 

About Nappy... 

We have to lovingly rescue nappy from
negative imagery. It is a term that should mean fuzzy or tightly
curled, like when you think of the nap of a soft fuzzy sweater. People
prefer to use kinky, which sounds more technically problematic rather
than physically descriptive. 

Nappy has negative imagery
because in the 1800's Europeans used the term to compare black hair to
that of sheep or animals. And thus, proof that blacks were less than
human because of their animal hair.

So I think that when
someone cringes when they here the word Nappy, they are thinking of the
negative fantasy created by a racist society, rather than the actual
definition that offers a physical description.

So what we are doing now is saving Nappy and defining our beauty through our own eyes, something much closer to reality.

0
JustMyTake

I have an idea. How about if you don’t like what he has to say just turn the station? I personally can’t stand Imus therefore I don’t listen. I also in no way believe he should have been fired. At what point do we stop using the race card and move forward with a positive approach to life? OK great now he’s fired. It’s a wonderful thing that racism is now over. It’s a wonderful thing we’ll never hear negative comments over the air waves again. It’s a wonderful thing BET network and comedy central will no longer have black people talking about white people in a negative way. I guess we can now set our sights on Bill O, Rush, and Howard.


I’m a Jewish person and if I only had $1.00 for every time a negative comment was made about Jewish people over the airwaves. I would be sitting on my own private <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />Island where the weather is 85 and sunny for 365 days out of the year. The reason why I don’t listen to Imus is because he’s made comments about Jewish people on several occasions throughout his career. I’ve just tuned him out. That’s the best way to deal with people like him. If enough people just did that he would have lost his job a long time ago.

<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> 

It’s actually insulting that this has taken up the entire news of the last few days. Can anyone tell me how many American lives were lost during this time in Iraq? Can anyone tell me where these deleted emails are from the Whitehouse in this new daily scandal?  Can anyone tell me what Robert Gates said yesterday regarding the troops? Can anyone tell me this new immigration bill now on the table? Can anyone tell me what’s going on in the mortgage market and foreclosures and why it’s happening?

 

This is the problem. We are bogged down in a war, soaring gas prices, huge global warming issues, and an economy that on the surface looks great but don’t tell that to the American auto workers and Citi employees who all lost their jobs. Let’s not mention record deficits and fiscal irresponsibility either.

0
toastie

While I agree with JustMyTake that there are so many critical issues out there that the media ignores in search of the next big tabloid story, I cannot embrace the strategy of "just tuning it out" or "changing the channel". Racism is just as important an issue as anything else mentioned.

Surely Bill O. and Rush and Howard Stern say some terribly offensive things, but we keep hearing about how Imus "crossed a line". That line was directing a racial epithet at a specific group of individuals who did nothing to provoke him. I am not defending rap artists and crude comedians, but I think this situation would have had much less gravity had Imus used the "nappy-headed-ho" remark generically, not directed at any particular group or if he had directed it at a specific celebrity. But he enthusiastically referred to a women's basketball team whose only attempt to garner attention was through their basketball-playing. He left a mark on each and every one of them that they can never escape from. They played on that Rutgers team, the one Imus called a bunch of "nappy-headed-hos". 

If you've spent your life letting people get away with anti-Semetic or otherwise racist remarks at your expense, and your attitude has been to ignore it, that's your choice, but shame on you for trivializing the outcry when people are offended and choose to speak out. 

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Kaitlin
First Flagged at 1:30 PM, Apr 10, 2007 by Kaitlin
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Strange

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from