Americans Divided on Origin of Humans

by ScienceDave | June 14, 2007 at 10:53 am
538 views | 10 Recommendations | 10 comments

Photos

Barbary macaque monkey

Barbary macaque monkey

see larger image

uploaded by mape_s

The results of a new Gallup poll on evolution has recently been released, but there was no horsing or monkeying around in this one.

The creationism vs evolution debate has recently been brought back into the media's spotlight as "Intelligent Design" proponents are insisting their hypothesis for humanity's origins be taught alongside others in public schools.

The recent Gallup Poll points to a deep line in the sand between the camps.

Here were the questions asked...

A. Evolution, that is, the idea that human beings developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life

B. Creationism, that is, the idea that God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years.


Here are the paired results for A and B.

                                Creationism? (%)
                                Definitely    Probably    Probably    Definitely
                                  True           True          False        False
Evolution?  Definitely       3               1               2              11
     (%)       True        
                Probably         5            14              12              3
                  True
                Probably        6               8              1                1
                 False
                Definitely       24            3             <0.5              1
                 False


These results show that:

* 24% of Americans believe that both the theory of evolution and the theory of creationism are probably or definitely true

* 41% believe that creationism is true, and that evolution is false

* 28% believe that evolution is true, but that creationism is false

* 3% either believe that both are false or have no opinion about at least one of the theories

Thirteen percent more Americans polled believe humanity was created by God, instead of evolution.  When asked why, 63% of them answered "Religious reasons, God created the world, I am a Christian, or they believe what they read in the Bible".  These religious undertones are not surprising.  

Now, what blew my mind was that 19% answered with, "I believe in Jesus Christ".  Since the question was an open ended one, it appears these creationists are associating themselves more so with their savior, than with "God made the world".  No where in the New Testament is it mentioned that Jesus was responsible for creating humans.

Two percent answered with, "No reason in particular".  I have a feeling these could be the few Republican  politicians who took the poll, and as such I feel I can change this answer to, "Because I wanted to get elected".

Americans who say they do not believe in the theory of evolution are highly likely to justify this belief by reference to religion, Jesus Christ, or the Bible. Furthermore, there is a strong correlation between high levels of personal religiosity and doubts about evolution.


What is surprising is that only 3% responded, "I don't believe humans come from beasts/monkey".  From my personal experience, most people I have talked to used this as their reason for doubting evolution.  It appears then that the concept of organisms evolving is not being attacked, but rather the implications of the hypothesis itself.  

Does this suggest the Scientific Method is under attack by religious teachings? Arguably, if one were concerned with the present data alone, they could find so called "missing links" and holes in the theory for a grand unifying hypothesis linking all organisms to a common ancestor.  However, since most Americans solely claimed religious reasons for their disbelief in evolution, in my opinion this suggests a deep-rooted distrust of the Scientific method (and likely, of scientists who practice it).  

How might this influence the general public's demeanor concerning most scientific discoveries, as well as the policies on different scientific issues?  Global warming has long been attacked by Republicans (by the way, 60% of which do not believe in evolution of humans, compared to 40% of Democrats).  Might this be partly due to their distrust of information gained through scientific discovery?

If not a distrust, there certainly appears to be confusion among believers in either camp.  About a quarter of Americans polled believed either some form of evolution AND creationism was true. Why might this be, since, according to the questions, they are mutually exclusive hypotheses?  Although it is entirely possible that the poll itself was not effective in teasing out the correct information (i.e. they believe in evolution, but not for humans, or some sort of variation on this), a large group of Americans are not sure what they believe.


Please discuss Now Public readers!

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Jordan Yerman

In Sunday School (yes, I went as a lad), I was taught that the Old Testament stories were allegories, and not to be taken literally: to wit, the whole world-in-seven-days thing just meant that humans were the last to be created. I don't think that faith in a higher power and belief in evolution are mutually exclusive.

0
ScienceDave

I agree Jordan, they are not.  One can have faith in a higher power, believing the world was created by an omnipotent being, while still believing in natural "laws" that govern the universe.


However, the two questions provided in the poll as they pertain to the origin of humans. "human beings developed over millions of years via evolution" versus "God created human beings in the last 10,000 years", are mutually exclusive.

Kaitlin
Kaitlin
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 12:00 on June 14th, 2007

nouseforadave, thank you for posting this. Something else worth mentioning is the bias of the original question: "A. Evolution, that is, the idea that human beings developed over millions of years from LESS ADVANCED FORMS OF LIFE."

That is a telling thing...less advanced makes it seem like we emerged as these specs, instead of in god's image. No Christian wants to deal with that.

Those forms of life weren't less advanced--they were perfectly adapted to their circumstances, as are we (especially X Men). 

0
ScienceDave

I couldn't agree more Kailtin, and thank you for bringing this up.  I forgot to include it in the article. 

0
ScienceDave

I couldn't agree more Kailtin, and thank you for bringing this up.  I forgot to include it in the article. 

ricknight
ricknight
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:46 on June 14th, 2007

The "I believe in Jesus Christ" line shouldn't be surprising, JC and
God are interchangable (with the Holy spirit addition) since 325 AD
and the First Ecumenical Council of Nicaea. Metaphysics makes anything
possible regardless of the plausibility -> Good stuff.

0
talentedchimp

Religion tells us the we are the special creation of the deity made in "His image and likeness".  It tells us that we are 'better' than all the other 'animals' and that we were created to have "dominion over them".  It also tells us that if we behave we will be treated specially after we die, in fact we won't really die, we go to a place where we can all feel superior to those who didn't behave - for eternity.  It also tells us that we must be obedient to authority - this is 'good behaviour'.  It also tells us that those who don't believe what we believe must ipso facto be animals.

Evolution tells us that we no more special than the other 100 million species on this planet; the single celled bacterium, the nematode worm, the jellyfish, the snake, the dog, the chimpanzee, etc.  It tells us that we are related to all these other "lower" life forms.  It tells us that we evolved through a long process of trial and error of survival.

Which explanation is more satisfying to the demoralised and fragile human ego?  Which explanaton is more useful to those who wish to have dominion over others? 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Kaitlin
First Flagged at 12:00 PM, Jun 14, 2007 by Kaitlin
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from