Asian seafarers may have been North America's first inhabitants

by Barry Artiste | August 21, 2007 at 06:25 am
2586 views | 0 Recommendations | 5 comments

Photos

Asian seafarers may have been North America's first inhabitants

Asian seafarers may have been North America's first inhabitants

see larger image

uploaded by Barry Artiste

Opinion
Barry Artiste, Now Public Contributor

I seem to remember something like this in a National Geographic Magazine decades ago in that North American Aboriginals and Asians share a trait that most of us do not. Their body hair is straight as opposed to curly.   Now that it is  discovered that sea faring  asians may have populated the North American North West makes sense as rafts had been discovered thousands of years before canoes or boats.  Certainly something of interest to  watch for in future developments on this story.

My Final Thought

I also seem to recall First Nations discounting this theory, perhaps fearing the title "Founding Peoples" may be in doubt by Archeologists and Academia alike.   

url="http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=fd1b5336-a2b4-42c7-9ff8-35dd85f66b6a&k=67106"]In a Canadian archeological project that could revolutionize understanding of when and how humans first reached the New World, federal researchers in B.C. have begun probing an underwater site off the Queen Charlotte Islands for traces of a possible prehistoric camp on the shores of an ancient lake long since submerged by the Pacific Ocean.

The landmark investigation, led by Parks Canada scientist Daryl Fedje, is seeking evidence to support a contentious new theory about the peopling of the Americas that is gradually gaining support in scholarly circles. It holds that ancient Asian seafarers, drawn on by food-rich kelp beds ringing the Pacific coasts of present-day Russia, Alaska and British Columbia, began populating this hemisphere thousands of years before the migration of Siberian big-game hunters - who are known to have travelled across the dried up Bering Strait and down an ice-free corridor east of the Rockies as the last glaciers began retreating about 13,000 years ago.

The earlier maritime migrants are thought to have plied the coastal waters of the North Pacific in sealskin boats, moving in small groups over many generations from their traditional homelands in the Japanese islands or elsewhere along Asia's eastern seaboard.

Interest in the theory - which is profiled in the latest edition of New Scientist magazine by Canadian science writer Heather Pringle - has been stoked by recent DNA studies in the U.S. showing tell-tale links between a 10,000-year-old skeleton found in an Alaskan cave and genetic traits identified in modern Japanese and Tibetan populations, as well as in aboriginal groups along the west coasts of North and South America.

The rise of the "coastal migration" theory has also been spurred by a sprinkling of other ancient archeological finds throughout the Americas - several of them, including the 14,850-year-old Chilean site of Monte Verde, too old to fit the traditional theory of an overland migration by the "first Americans" that didn't begin for another millennium or two.

Proponents of coastal migration argue that Ice Age migrants in boats may have island-hopped southward along North America's west coast as early as 16,000 years ago, taking advantage of small refuges of land that had escaped envelopment by glaciers.

The difficulty is that nearly all of the land that might contain traces of human settlement or activity - the critical proof for archeologists - is now under water.

Several significant finds have been made in raised caves along the B.C. coast that were not inundated by the rising Pacific in post-glacial Canada.

In 2003, Simon Fraser University scientists reported the discovery of 16,000-year-old mountain goat bones in a cave near Port Eliza on Vancouver Island, and similar finds of prehistoric bear bones pre-dating the glacial retreat have been held up as proof of a shoreline ecosystem that could have sustained large mammals, as well as human hunters.

The new Parks Canada target is at a site in the Gwaii Hanaas National Park Reserve just north of Burnaby Island, near the southern end of the Queen Charlottes.

According to the New Scientist, Fedje has discovered evidence of a prehistoric lake and streambed about 50 metres below the surface at a site called Section Cove, as well as signs that the river and lake were once rich sources of salmon - an "irresistible" food source for ancient coastal migrants.

"We are pretty positive that there will be an archeological site where we think it should be on that lake shore," Fedje told the British-based publication. "There's no reason why people couldn't have been on these old landscapes 14,000 or more years ago."

Fedje couldn't be reached on Monday for comment. But environmental assessment notices posted at a federal website indicate that initial sampling of sediments was carried out last summer and that work was continuing this summer with "detailed imagery of the sea floor and sub-bottom profiles in the Section Cove area in preparation for underwater survey and excavation the following year."

A book published in 2003 by Canadian author Tom Koppel summarized the research projects being carried out along the Pacific Coast and wove a powerful argument in favour of coastal migration.

It's a thesis, he insisted, that could "revolutionize our most fundamental self-image" if proven correct.

"We have been accustomed to thinking of ourselves as a species in terrestrial terms - evolving in the savanna of Africa; hunkering in caves in Europe; gradually spreading overland through Asia; and finally trekking dry-shod across a land bridge at the Bering Strait into the Americas while preying upon big Ice Age animals,'' he wrote in Lost World - Rewriting Prehistory: How New Science is Tracing America's Ice Age Mariners.

"But if the scientists on the Pacific coast were right, we also became bold seafarers at a very early date, maritime people who built boats and braved the stormy and icebound shores of the North Pacific. And we lived not just from hunting mammoths and huge bison, but also from spearing sea mammals, from fishing, and from gathering shellfish and seaweed."

CanWest News Service[/q]

recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
khunhunter

I believe that one looks at anthropological and archaeological you can easily find studies linking Asia and or parts of what is or was the Soviet Union with the first human inhabitants of North and South America.  Both phenotypical and genotypical traits and archaeolinquistic evidence strongly suggests that the first humans on these continents came from Asia.  Dr. Otto Sadusfsky late of the California University system did exhaustive research on the linguistic ties to regions in Asia and the former Soviet Union. 

0
Barry Artiste

Thanks for the insight into the story of mankind KHunhunter, it is appreciated

0
Duane Whittlef

Interesting but what you do with the Decalogue Stone written in Paleo (ancient) Hebrew (Israelites) that is located in Los Lunas New Mexico written around 500 BCE

And also the ancient Copper miners in upper Michigan that mined surface copper with tools dating back to 1000 BCE and they are tools that the ancient Israelites made and copies have been found in Israel identical to those found in the UP of Michigan.

Even the native Americans deny being here that long ago.  The Phoenicians along with the Israelites were the only ones that had any knowledge of navigating by the stars and had learned the currents of the ocean, these along with the Carthaginians that controlled the in and outs of the Mediterranean.  So perhaps your theory might have holes in it, Where is your proof?


Please reply.....Thank you 

0
Duane Whittlef

Interesting but what do you do with the Decalogue Stone written in Paleo (ancient) Hebrew (Israelites) that is located in Los Lunas New Mexico written around 500 BCE

And also the ancient Copper miners in upper Michigan that mined surface copper with tools dating back to 1000 BCE and they are tools that the ancient Israelites made and copies have been found in Israel identical to those found in the UP of Michigan.

Even the native Americans deny being here that long ago.  The Phoenicians along with the Israelites were the only ones that had any knowledge of navigating by the stars and had learned the currents of the ocean, these along with the Carthaginians that controlled the in and outs of the Mediterranean.  So perhaps your theory might have holes in it, Where is your proof?

Addendum:  Numerous artifacts from the Israelite period during the reign of King David and then his son Solomon that required ample amounts of copper that was to be mixed with tin from Great Britain to make bronze for the Temple that Solomon was to build,  have surfaced in many places of the USA.

This is just real quick and sentence structure in very poor but I think you will get the gist of what I am saying.

Please reply.....Thank you 

0
Barry Artiste

Thanks for the insight into the story of mankind KHunhunter, it is appreciated

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from