Boyd vs Jarvis on the importance of local news

by mtippett | August 1, 2007 at 08:32 am
569 views | 0 Recommendations | 0 comments

Earlier this week Leonard Brody, one of my co-founders at NowPublic sparked controversy in the blogosphere when he questioned the relevance of local news to the new generation of media consumers.  He was quoted on GigaOm as saying:

“I’m not a believer in local anymore,” said Brody. “I used to think that hyperlocal was what mattered to people, but for 35 and under especially, the concept of local is very different. Like Facebook publishing the news feed… it’s changed from hyperlocal to hyperpersonal.” Weather, traffic, and crime are important, but they’re commodities, he said, adding local politics might be the exception, but nobody cares about them anymore.


Jeff Jarvis then weighed in along side Rafat Ali who translated Len's comment into: "local's hard as hell".


Today Stowe Boyd sided up with with Brody when he wrote:

I think Jeff is a bit dreamy about an old-time notion of locality, or generationally oriented toward his turf as locality.

I think one reason the local newspapers are falling by the wayside, in a time of increased mobility and generations of growing mobility behind us is that people have less connections to the specific turf that they sleep in or work in. The social capital in the neighborhood continues to dwindle.

I for one am with Len on this.  I know I spend more time on facebook than CNN.  As far as my news consuming habits go its about the network not about the place. 

Comments (0)

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from