Brace yourself, WWIII is coming so lets buy time.

Hypothetical Film WWII Scene: Lights, camera and action. As the film progresses, four brave American soldiers in Germany had exited out of their helicopter only to find themselves killed execution style by four Jewish men who had escaped from the Nazi Concentration Camp. Something wrong with this picture?

Well, they sure weren’t very appreciative and I could only wonder why. In real time, the Jewish men and women wept when American soldiers came to rescue them from the evil tyranny of Hitler’s regime. There are some significant differences though, WWII had merit and the Iraq war could have had merit but it went wrong. I can't even imagine four Americans getting off an airplane and having to line up and be shot one by one. I used this WWII example because its shows how ridiculous it is that this rescue Iraq mission is not seen this way by many of the Iraqis. Not all of them feel this way but enough do.

Facts~ You can not rescue the Iraqis who want democracy but fear fighting the Sunni and Shiites or do not want war to gain it. You can not rescue two powers who do not want you there. Since hindsight is still lacking within our government and some presidential incumbents speaking dialogue like, We can win this war the fact is, the inner civil war in Iraq is outside  of anyone’s control! 

Here are some real time realities:

1)            Human nature has been consistent over time. When one government rules a country and is overthrown eventually the fight to regain its loss will come. The Sunni want back that control. They are killing with fraudulent emotions. What that means is a person is unaware of their true motive's or they're and lie but American troops in Iraq have little to do with their gunfire and bombings.  When we pull out of Iraq, those who disagree with me will probably go into shock or denial. We tend to doll up our little boxes of alternative motives and paint them as we choose but the rivalry is about power. The Sunnis want governmental control and the Shiites want their time to lead. That’s the ABC’s of the civil war in Iraq and no amount of American troops can stop it.

2)      For some of you who’ve read my past articles on the Iraq war this will be redundant. I realize I wrote these thoughts three days into the war so just move onto reason number three. History again will prove my point. You can not take a people who have been in prison emotionally and expect them to change their ways overnight.  Dictatorship puts a stop on cultural and society growth. Democracy has potential in Iraq but not for centuries to come. You can not take a nation that hates its enemy, see its enemy on their land and expect them to think your now bosom buddies who sincerely care. They will only see your position as occupiers and will not believe your intent is for their peace. Then you take history and human nature and wrap it around this huge factor, No Nukes in Iraq and still think you can solve their problems. We, America can not make good in Iraq. The longer we stay, we create the Middle East scapegoat minds that will say and are saying, America will take over our country too if we don’t go and support our brother, Iraq. We must fight to remove the occupiers in Iraq. Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejadi is already speaking this united front lingo. Hello! Russian gave them missiles and the UN is sanctioning Iran thinking that this will change the situation. We are so arrogant. We can not stop Iran from possessing nukes not today or tomorrow. Russia will support Iran and WWIII is so close, that I wouldn’t be surprised in two to three years if a nuclear bomb hits America.

3)      If you can see deeper than propaganda, if you can see deeper than what you hear others say and see, the fact is America will not start a war with Iran. What America is capable of doing is fueling Iran’s attack with Iraq and thus eventually, Israel. Lebanon is having its beginning coup battle and will want our support. If we go in and support them, Iran then gets involved, Israel will get attacked and the Sunnis and Shiites continue their inner warfare until another Middle Eastern leader steps in and says, Its time for the Sunni and Shiite to stop fighting each other and unite to fight against America and Israel.

Bush deployment plan

Cheney said,  "But in terms of this effort, the president has made his decision. We've consulted extensively with them. We'll continue to consult with the Congress. But the fact of the matter is, we need to get the job done."

Bush wants to send in more troops to help bring stability to Iraq. More troops would help for a short amount of time and yet twenty thousand+ troops will not bring stability to Iraq.  Bush needs at least half million troops to do this. Again, this is a human nature problem and an obvious mathematical solution. More troops will slow down the aggression but it also fuels it. The visual offense of seeing more Americans on their land just fuels more Iraqis to join the Sunni and Shiite extremist solutions. Twenty thousand troops helps a little, hinders a little. Call it a wash for a year.  

Solution 1

We send in half million troops and plan on occupying and living in Iraq for the next hundred years. With this, we can create stability for a short season and then our presence would fuel, Sunni and Shiite working together, Iran on its side, Hezbollah’s on their side, Lebanon possibly on their side, little quiet North Korea participating, Russia supporting indirectly and little ole Israel waiting for its combined attack. Why is this considered a solution? Well, you would bring stability to Iraq for a quick season and Israel would be more protected because more American troops would reside there as well. Heck, I would give it two years and then, all hell lets loose in the Middle East.

Solution 2

We offer a pull out date with no more troops. The results with solution 2 are just the same as solution 1 except we buy more time. The only difference is I would estimate five to ten years before Americans are fighting to protect Israel and that is of course, if we are smart enough to stay out of Lebanon. When we pull out of Iraq, the smartest decision the United States can do is work even more closely with Israel and its borders.

If I was the president, one of the smartest decision’s I could make is to protect ourselves from Nukes through advanced technology. I would probably vote for the next president that made this a first priority. We need to put as much money as possible into protecting ourselves from a Nuclear bomb. There has to be a way to redirect accurately multiple Nuclear bombs  and maybe one day, creating a bomb that when it hits a Nuke, changes its molecular make up. Basically, diffuse the damn thing in the air. This may sound like Disneyland but imagination has created many inventions. Our great hope as a nation is to have the know-with-all to deal with nuclear bombs while in the air before they hit land.

I seem to be one of the few that understood what this war was going to mean and I am actually getting tired of writing about it. It feels like some sort of insanity to hear any politician speak apple pie happy endings for the Iraq war. It’s a bunch of bull sheeot. The main reason we pull out is to save money, work on our nation, prepare for another war and not let our presence fuel any fraudulent emotions in the Middle East. Lets not be the Sunni and Shiite’s out, for why they think they are fighting. Let’s leave so the real reason pops up although they shall deny it even then. That sound good to you? Let’s not  stir up more animosity with Iran or the Hezbollah’s because they want war with us anyway.  When you look at their history the Middle East has been in constant war with their neighbors. Why give them an excuse to unite against us?

When we leave Iran’s leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejadi will declare that we are the cause of Iraq’s tomorrow problems and so will many other people. There is no way to remove the future linger of animosity towards America. We will hear of their war and uprisings and their grief will be apart of ours. They want to make their own history and many do not want war. Removing Saddam, an evil dictator did cause problems for the Iraqi people and had the war been only on their behalf, the outcome would be far better than today.

Logically and reasonably, I keep myself quite aware of just facts and the critic’s accusations towards Bush and the Iraq war. As a daily reader and watcher of the news there isn’t proof of a deliberate deception but there is plenty proof of what, one day we might call, one of the biggest mistakes our government has ever made. We only know, at least at this point, that we entered the war with false information. We owe the Iraqi people an opportunity to know peace and democracy but with the continual uprisings and the attitude of an old enemy on their land, we will do nothing more than just fuel anger across nations. The answer to Iraq doesn't come from politics or war tactics. The answer to Iraq comes from knowing history and mans nature.