Brzezinski Suggests False Flag Event Could Kick-Start Iran War

"The
three grand imperatives of imperial geostrategy are to prevent
collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals, to keep
tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians from
coming together." (The Grand Chessboard p.40)

Human-Deficient Brzezinski Exposed for 9/11 Culpability

Security Attempts to Seize Activist's Video Tape and Intimidate Free Speech During Oration by

'Grand' Architect and Trilateral Player Serving Agenda of Would-Be Global Landlords

Aaron Dykes / JonesReport | April 25, 2007

We Are Change
activist and 9/11 Truther Luke Rudkowski narrowly escaped from literal
goons overseeing a Zbigniew Brzezinski speaking engagement. The brute
force now closely guarding the establishment objected, it seems, to the
unmasking question aimed at the former member of the
Carter Administration, who was selected for public service-- along with
the majority of that administration-- from the more private, but no
less influential Trilateral Commission, founded by David Rockefeller.

Security
not only tried to silence and remove the critical activist, it
attempted to confiscate his video tape of the encounter by force,
cornering Rudkowski into the position of running for escape after
announcing that "9/11 was an inside job" and "national sovereignty will
prevail" during his escorted departure.

Click HERE for Google Video

Luke's
limited opportunity to put forward a question to Brzezinski was wisely
used in a quick, but articulate and carefully worded message that seeks
to set-aside Brzezinski's layers of faux-legitimacy and
address actual, relevant issues which actually affecting the real
world-- peeling off deceptive and charming rhetoric in which the
punch-drunk crowd readily indulged:

"Earlier on in this year, you gave a speech to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee where you alluded to the fact that the Bush Administration may stage a terrorist attack
to justify a military action against Iran. And then in your book, you
also addressed the fact that a memo where Bush and Blair discussed
painting a U2 spy plane in U.N. colors so Saddam would shoot it down."

"Although
you have argued that deceptions to the American public may be necessary
in order to deal with these enemies, how are we to know how many other
terrorist attacks have been state-sponsored false flag incidents
including the largest one-- the attacks of 9/11?"

"How
do we know, how do the American people know that 9/11 wasn't staged,
wasn't engineered by you, David Rockefeller, the Trilateral Commission,
the C.F.R. (crowd begins to boo, hiss and react) and Bilderberg Group, sir?"

"It's
a question. Answer my question. You sponsored al Qaida, sir. You are a
criminal. You sponsored al Qaida. In 1979, you gave them money. That's
true. You are C.F.R. scum. You are C.F.R. and New World Order scum. You
and David Rockefeller will never have a New World Order. National
sovereignty will prevail."

As the question was quashed, the crowd cheered at Brzezinski's insistence that Rudkowski "sit down and shut up." The crowd yells back to Luke "You are scum."

The New York based group We Are Change
has had its share of challenges to the right of free speech and has had
to fight for the rights of alternate media, which is largely
internet-based and thus often appears less legitimate than
establishment-cosy mainstream media. Recently the group was harassed by police outside ABC Studios during a peaceful demonstration of support for Rosie's public assertion of 9/11 Truth.

During
another demonstration in front of the new Building 7, police confiscate
the group's camera and literally accuse them of being "terrorists." SEE
VIDEO BELOW

Here,
Luke asserted that he "has every right" to security over challenges
that his rights to free speech and existence as media are somehow
invalid.

Rudkowski's attempt to bring accountability to Brzezinski's doorstep
is not the vain act of demanding attention from notable civil servants,
nor the pursuit of some mere messenger in New World Order false-flag
terror. Brzezinski's penchant for designs of world architecture and
provocateured re-mapping is well documented, primarily by the
thoroughly-articulated visions of American primacy and geopolitical
dominance penned by his own hand. He is a key tactician in the
globalist system and his strategy is clearly laid out in his book, The Grand Chessboard.

His
role in 9/11 itself is not directly established, yet statements of cold
strategy reveal his callous attitude towards the worth of human life
and its relevant price towards geostrategic goals:

"The
attitude of the American public toward the external projection of
American power has been much more ambivalent. The public supported
America's engagement in World War II largely because of the shock
effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor." (The Grand Chessboard pp 24-5)

"The
pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in
conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of
domestic well-being." (The Grand Chessboard p. 35)

"Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it
may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy
issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely
perceived direct external threat." (The Grand Chessboard p. 211)

That crafted policy-- dating to 1997-- was echoed only three years later by the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), a think tank highly influential in the formation and focus of the Bush Administration's foreign policy.

The
PNAC policy paper Rebuilding America's Defense mapped out a plan for
American primacy and suggested-- spinning Brzezinski's notion of a
"sudden threat" causing a "shock effect" like Pearl Harbor to foster
support into an idea of their own:

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor."

The
hypothetical strategy for cultivating American power out of human
sacrifice and a "widely-perceived direct external threat" was
conveniently picked up by the Council on Foreign Relations, of which
Brzezinski has been a long-time member, just three days after the 9/11 attacks:

"There
is a chance for the President of the United States to use the disaster
. . . to carry out what his father - a phrase his father used I think
only once, and it hasn't been used since - and that is a New World
Order."
- Senator Gary Hart at the Council on Foreign Relations, September 14, 2001

While
the PNAC doctrine was clearly instrumental in the approach to an Iraqi
war, Brzezinski's idea goes further, not simply seeking a war for
profit, but to craft an entire cultural pre disposal towards world
dominance led by a completely hegemonic and imperial America-- making
the case for America as the "first and last truly global superpower."

"In brief, for the United States, Eurasian geostrategy involves the purposeful management of geostrategically dynamic states and the careful handling of geopolitically catalytic states,
in keeping with the twin interests of America in the short-term:
preservation of its unique global power and in the long-run
transformation of it into increasingly institutionalized global
cooperation."

This framework for American hegemony in context of regional and global cooperation is echoed and reinforced in true PROJECT MOCKINGBIRD
style by influential academics and political scientists, including the
likes of John Ikenberry, Francis Fukyama and Samuel Huntington.

His
foreign policy methods have predominated the think tank and
intellectual circles that feed politicians in power, with younger
foreign policy elites like James B. Steinberg (member of Bilderberg, Trilateral, C.F.R., former Brookings Institute and current Dean at the L.B.J. School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas)
waiting to take the lead in mapping out a policy approach aimed at
achieving ruthless goals of world control and targeting geostrategic
pivots that would spearhead regional cohesion and insure regional
influence-- with Iran-control in key focus.

James B. Steinberg, for one, writes justifying "preventive war" with Iran on the agenda's horizon --
selling its efficacy in dealing with even "latent" threats like
"terrorism and weapons proliferation" while carrying the legitimacy of
policy agreed upon by a United Nations security council, or failing
that, at least a "regional organization," or perhaps even a "coalition
of like-minded states" which might prevail in relative legitimacy--
revealing that truly sovereign bodies would be reduced to their
relevant function and usefulness in justifying an end through any means
beneficial.

"Conditional sovereignty is central to a new norm of state responsibility."

"One
problem with the Bush doctrine, then, is not that it is overly reliant
on preventive force but that it too narrowly conceives of its use."

"The
Bush administration got the first step right, and the logic of its
arguments builds toward the second. But it has gotten step three wrong.
Unilateralism is not the only alternative to the Security Council."

Calling out such treasonous behavior
is important in activism, for reasons only beginning with exposure.
Willfully provocating war for strategic purposes does not fit within a
gray world where the end-justifies the means; it is the regrettable
case of unrestrained, elite madmen plotting and executing for world
dominance and personnel profit.

Zbigniew Brzezinski
doesn't favor war with Iran, but definitely concurs with Iran's
strategic preeminence. He hopes diplomacy will be sufficient to
facilitate regional dominance, noting the risks war could have in
triggering Russia or even China into war over threats to its interests
and/or sense of space. He also cites the potential strain on military
capabilities. He is, though, clearly intent on influencing Iran to the
greatest degree possible, exercising force if it becomes necessary.

"That puts a premium on maneuver and manipulation in order to prevent
the emergence of a hostile coalition that could eventually seek to
challenge America's primacy..."(Regarding Middle East strategy in The Grand Chessboard p. 198)

Going it the calm route could translate into faster control of more pieces.
Brzezinski wants the whole map, not just the short gain cash cows, and
won't advocate taking Iran alone at the cost of sacrificing EU-courted
Ukraine and Caucasus/ Central Asian prizes, including Azerbaijan,
Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Georgia
and Armenia, which he assesses as all potentially vulnerable if Russia
stays weak [The Grand Chessboard].

Click for a larger image

He
has stated, in justification for his tactical, financial and
organizational founding of the Taliban during the late 70s as a means
of sufficiently weakening the Soviet Union:

"Which is more important in world history: The Taliban or the fall of
the Soviet Empire? A few over-excited Islamists or the liberation of
Central Europe and the end of the Cold War?”

The modern-day Machiavelli puts his "grand" scheming above the limitations of legitimate threat response,
provocateured threat response and even Steinberg's pseudo-justified
"latent" threats-- he's goes right for the spoils themselves as
justification.

War actually justified-- publicly-- as war for the sake of world domination and primacy of the American way.
A visionary-- past the vain pretense of cause. A man who wants true
results. Advanced Hegelian thinking, skipping the gaming steps of
problem and reaction-- Zbigniew Brzezinski has a solution.

Zbigniew Brzezinski with Osama bin Laden, 1979

Activist
Luke Rudkowski was apt to meet the clear-headed and cynical approach of
Brzezinski with well-read and cutting comments dissecting the real
agendas guiding the smokescreen force of false-flag attacks and
provocateured events that lie at the heart of the true enemy at hand.

It
is important to meet as many of our "public servants" with questions
about 9/11 Truth and demand their attention and attempt to harness
their representative power to turn around the New World Order
government-- which is riding away on the robust engine of American
economic and military might.

However,
it is important to keep focus on the real forces pulling the strings.
Brzezinski is something of the helmsman functionary, right hand man to
the globalist owners who demand orchestration and control. Rudkowski, a
founding member of We Are Change, was
also instrumental in organizing protest at the Council on Foreign
Relations during the multi-pronged demonstrations on the fifth
anniversary of the 9/11 false-flag attack-- seeking to
hold responsible not only the functionaries who carried out the
state-sponsored attack, but the ideas behind that, and those who shape
those ideas.

Rudkowski is not grandstanding, but attacking with precision, when he ends the video with a message: "Yeah, Brzezinski, you got yours." He certainly had it coming.

"This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of one world government. National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept."

--- Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter