Canadian Police Caught Attempting To Stage Riots

by Kenada | August 24, 2007 at 11:13 am
674 views | 10 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

Canadian Police Caught Attempting To Stage Riots

Canadian Police Caught Attempting To Stage Riots

see larger image

uploaded by Kenada

This story is meant to show how the media, state/federal government
agencies, try to spin the truth when caught red handed at wrong doing

For example,

"Quebec provincial authorities have admitted that three rock-wielding
mask-wearing "anarchists" were in fact police infiltrators used to
gather information on protesters at this week's SPP summit, but
authorities are still ludicrously denying the fact that the
provocateurs were intent on causing a riot in order to justify a
heavy-handed response."

So, the QPP tells us that, yes in fact these men were police, but
they were there to gather information and nothing more. But we know this to
be 100% untrue, if this statement was true, then why did one of the man
have a rock in his hand, ready to throw it at the QPP line? Why were
all these men hiding their faces, and why is it these men were not beaten for holding a weapon? Yes a rock can be a weapon!

This story should open allot of eyes, when you go out to protest in this day and age, you must always be aware
of the other people around you and what they are doing, if you do not
do this, you could end up with what you had at the WTO in '99 or more
recently in Ca. where the police marched on a park hitting every one
that was there with clubs and rubber bullets


Canadian Police Caught Attempting To Stage Riots

Authorities admit rock-wielding "black bloc anarchists" were really police infiltrators

Paul Joseph Watson

Prison Planet

Friday, August 24, 2007

 

Quebec provincial authorities have admitted that three rock-wielding mask-wearing "anarchists" were in fact police infiltrators used to gather information on protesters at this week's SPP summit, but authorities are still ludicrously denying the fact that the provocateurs were intent on causing a riot in order to justify a heavy-handed response.

Yesterday, debunkers attempted to claim that identical yellow marks on the boots of the "anarchists" and the police were simply Canadian Safety Industry seals and dismissed allegations that the three "anarchists" were undercover cops. Those same trolls and apologists for the authorities have egg on their face today after the police were forced to admit their role in using disguised cops to infiltrate the protesters before staging their arrests when they were exposed as agent provocateurs.

"Police came under fire Tuesday, when a video surfaced on YouTube that appeared to show three plainclothes police officers at the protest with bandanas across their faces. One of the men was carrying a rock," reports CBC.

"In the video, protest organizers in suits order the men to put the rock down, call them police instigators and try unsuccessfully to unmask them."

"Quebec provincial police admitted Thursday that three of their officers disguised themselves as demonstrators during the protest at the North American leaders summit in Montebello, Que. However, the police force denied allegations its undercover officers were there on Monday to provoke the crowd and instigate violence."

Protest organizers confirmed that four arrests had been made in total during the summit, all of legitimate demonstrators, meaning that the arrests of the "anarchists" was a staged event purely for public and media consumption to create the myth that the police were responding to the fact that one of the anarchists was wielding a rock and attempting to break through a police line.

Watching the video, it is clearly evident that as soon as the trio are exposed as police, they try to casually drift back into police ranks before cops are forced to stage their arrests.

Firstly, why should we accept the notion that it's legitimate for police officers to engage in tactics more familiar to rogue intelligence agencies by disguising themselves as anarchists in order to spy on completely non-violent protesters who are merely exercising their right to peaceably assemble?

Secondly, if the police had to go to the lengths of staging arrests to perpetuate the myth that the "anarchists" were real protesters then why should we believe for a second that they weren't intent on causing violence, since they had armed themselves with projectiles?

The so-called "black bloc" anarchists are completely infiltrated and controlled by the security services and are routinely employed at major protest events to cause riots and demonize legitimate peaceful protesters.


Dave Coles, president of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union, confronts the undercover cops and attempts to remove their face masks before the cops try to skulk back behind the police line.

In Seattle in 1999 at the World Trade Organization meeting, the authorities declared a state of emergency, imposed curfews and resorted to nothing short of police state tactics in response to a small minority of hostile black bloc hooligans. In his film Police State 2, Alex Jones covered the fact that the police allowed the black bloc to run riot in downtown Seattle while they concentrated on preventing the movement of peaceful protestors. The film presents clear evidence that the left-wing anarchist groups are actually controlled by the state and used to demonize peaceful protesters.

Video Links here,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mAWslHmi...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0POPVIX6s...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgxR9hQ2c...

At the WTO protests in Genoa 2001 a protestor was killed after being shot in the head and run over twice by a police vehicle. The Italian Carabinere also later beat on peaceful protestors as they slept, and even tortured some, at the Diaz School. It later emerged that the police fabricated evidence against the protesters, claiming they were anarchist rioters, to justify their actions. Some Carabiniere officials have since come forward to say they knew of infiltration of the so called black bloc anarchists, and that fellow officers acted as agent provocateurs.

At the Free Trade Area of Americas protests in Miami in late November 2003, more provocateuring was evident. The United Steelworkers of America calling for a congressional investigation, stated that the police intentionally caused violence and arrested and charged hundreds of peaceful protestors. The USWA suggested that billions of dollars supposedly slated for Iraq reconstruction funds are actually being used to subsidize "homeland repression" in America.

The leadership of the black bloc has been completely usurped by the authorities and anyone who still professes to be a member of the group is either supremely naive or completely stupid. To dress up like terrorists, all in black with ski masks and bandanas (like the police) immediately sends out a negative message to the watching public and demonizes legitimate protesters.

The black bloc should be immediately disbanded and anyone that dresses in their garb and threatens to engage in violence at a protest should be exposed to the media for what they are - dirty cowboy cops who think their job is to spy on and abuse peaceful protesters, scum who prey on the weak and give good police a bad name while ensuring the right to protest is chilled.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
phrolen

Kenada, I think your story has potential but.. what do you think, what is your commentary on the issue. The highlight tool is a great tool for incorporating outside sources into your own opinion, we try and stray from just pulling and posting. See what you cam put together as far as your perspective and I would be happy to remove the flag

0
phrolen

Kenada, thanks for improving your story -- I can see you've put more effort into it. I've removed the flag and now more readers can see it. Thanks for your contribution.

Daniel Neun
Daniel Neun
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 03:26 on August 25th, 2007

Hi Kenada. Thanks for bringing that story. It´s a little funny reading about the "Black Bloc" as "scum" "dressed up like terrorists", though. The history of militant resistance - which is my history, too - is a little more complicated than that. Where people have no choice but to surrender or fight, my choice is clear, still.

It´s just the chance of achieving positiv changes without militancy that makes the difference. And social unrest is no "terrorism", in any case, even if it´s militant.

Well, the idea of undercover actions by the executive branch is to demoralize political protest, isolate it from people´s sympathies and undermine its effectiveness.

But political protest is useless if it bases on demonstrations anyway. That´s the main point. We all should focus on the most important weapons against corruption, dictatorship, hypocrisy and exploitation:

information and organisation.

Greetz from the not-that-old Republic of Germany. 

 

liamssoft
liamssoft
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 06:20 on September 4th, 2007

Kenada, this is interesting and the video proof looks slightly inconclusive.
What say the Police?

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from