Climate Alarmists Vs Senate “Consensus Busters” Report

by mpress | December 20, 2007 at 08:55 am

294 views | 0 Recommendations | 0 comments

“climate
alarmists might be wrong.” Is it true? Well of course there is a 50%
chance that climate alarmists are wrong. So why is there such hatred
towards the people who consider themselves skeptics of the disaster
scenario Gore paints. They are called “The Deniers” like some fringe
group associated with hate and bigotry.

Some want to
paint skeptics as evil, not smart enough or paid off. They are too
stupid to figure it out so we are going to let Al Gore lead us to the
salvation of Earth. Al Gore? Maybe the messenger is and his message are
too political to convince certain people that his theory is correct,
And maybe his science is questionable too. Or all the money he makes
with his “the end is coming” $6000 a minute speech.

The
problem may be that his theory involves changing laws and raising taxes
and making “you” change the way “you” live. So there is a 50% chance he
is wrong and he wants 100% of your support. If not you get labeled
“Denier!” What no debate? What a great position to have, I’m right
conversations over..

Remember when Al
wanted to recount the Florida 2000 vote over and over again until the
Supreme Court said “Stop this Circus, Bush is President,” the same
election where the Democrats in West Palm Beach voted by “mistake” for
Pat Buchanan and gave G.W.B the victory?

Since then Al
Gore and his followers have made every effort to make Gore more
powerful than the President a “Saint” and “winner of all awards” except
Time’s “person of the Year.” You can’t win them all Al. ..mpress

400 scientists who disagree with the Gore team .

In October, the Washington Post Staff Writer Juliet Eilperin conceded the obvious, writing that climate skeptics “appear to be expanding rather than shrinking.” Many scientists from around the world have dubbed 2007 as the year man-made global warming fears “bites the dust.” (LINK)

This blockbuster Senate report lists the scientists by name, country of residence, and academic/institutional affiliation. It also features their own words, biographies, and weblinks to their peer reviewed studies and original source materials as gathered from public statements, various news outlets, and websites in 2007. This new “consensus busters” report is poised to redefine the debate.

Source: epw.senate.gov