Help me out on this please. I posted a story by two scientists.
John McLean is climate data analyst based in Melbourne, Australia.

Tom Harris is the Ottawa-based Executive Director of the Natural

Resources Stewardship Project entitled

The UN Climate Change Numbers Hoax 

Shortly after I posted it I saw a good member logo beside my name.

Shortly after that I got flaged by science  Dave. He disagrees with their findings. That's fine but does it derserve a flag? Is Dave more qualified than the writers. I don't know, but is Dave the final authority on the subject

Then in this post Dave describes them as "
Global warming denialists Tom Harris and John McLean attacked the credibility of the fourth IPCC" Not very nice. Does he have proof they are Global warming denialists or is that just his opinion. Should I flag him? No, I believe in freedom of both the press and thought. Both in short supply in 2007

Dave is an editor for Public Now. His post is given a good stuff icon from another editor. Is this good policy? 

A person tgged my post as good stuff but I guess it won't show up as long as I'm flaged. Maybe the readers can connvice Dave to pull the flag.

Hope this doesn't get me banned or blocked because I believe this site is important.