The presence of "sides" is somewhat of an illusion. The majority of skeptics have been shown time and time again to have ulterior motives. DeSmogblog has been doing just this: their "denier database" includes:
DeSmog is thoroughly investigating 61 signatories
to an anti-climate-change petition sent in April, '06 to Canada's Prime
Minister. Supporters claim it is signed by "60 leading scientists." We
will report daily on their credentials and their connections (or their
lack of connections) to the oil or tobacco industries.
Doesn't he Nobel Prize carry a substansial monetary prize with it?
So you're suggesting all the climate scientists in the world, and the IPCC (a UN body) were always gunning for a nobel prize? The pro-GW crowd has been talking about this for decades (i.e. when Gore or the Nobel Prize had nothing to do with it).
Truemors
Sign in to NowPublic
at 16:05 on December 18th, 2007
The presence of "sides" is somewhat of an illusion. The majority of skeptics have been shown time and time again to have ulterior motives. DeSmogblog has been doing just this: their "denier database" includes:
Doesn't he Nobel Prize carry a substansial monetary prize with it?
So you're suggesting all the climate scientists in the world, and the IPCC (a UN body) were always gunning for a nobel prize? The pro-GW crowd has been talking about this for decades (i.e. when Gore or the Nobel Prize had nothing to do with it).