I am currently a bit limited as I work with Opera and an HTC Hermes PDA, and some parts of NP are simply too sophisticated for that.
www.spiegel.de ran the story in German, original source were Lübecker Nachrichten.
I think the Government rationale simply is to get what they can in taxation, as long as they label it a climate protection measure. This country is in true CO2 hysteria so you can sell any hike under this label.
The big secret in pectore to me seems, how is higher taxation going to make anything environmentally sound if the German industry, indulged by lackluster guidelined from government, have procrastinated to make technologies available to the transportation business?
Truemors
Sign in to NowPublic
at 13:19 on January 1st, 2008
Hello folks,
I am currently a bit limited as I work with Opera and an HTC Hermes PDA, and some parts of NP are simply too sophisticated for that.
www.spiegel.de ran the story in German, original source were Lübecker Nachrichten.
I think the Government rationale simply is to get what they can in taxation, as long as they label it a climate protection measure. This country is in true CO2 hysteria so you can sell any hike under this label.
The big secret in pectore to me seems, how is higher taxation going to make anything environmentally sound if the German industry, indulged by lackluster guidelined from government, have procrastinated to make technologies available to the transportation business?