You state, It is frightening that the public can become so scared of governmental 'boogeymen', that they would actually call for a re-examination of the Canadian death penalty.
I state in my story if ever a terrorist act like this ever comes to fruition on Canadian soil then a rexamination of the Death Penalty should be looked at.
You also state that "May I remind the author of this article, that nothing actually happened in this case of 'terrorism', contrary to what you imply with the opening line of your article. This case is still progressing through the courts, in which all suspects are innocent until proven guilty."
I state to you, the reason it did not go through is our Intelligence service caught them before they could act. Do you feel they must behead our Prime Minister to prove your point?
You further state "Let us remember that the sensational allegations from the government are just that - allegations. They remain to be proven, and the government has a long history of claiming such sensational things without any basis.
I state with knowledge that these terrorist are caught "Dead to Rights" so it is safe to state a fact they were in progress to act, this from telephone conversations, emails, computer hard drive info etc. As for being alleged terrorists, that is like saying you are an alleged Mental Deficient, when your rants of 9-11 collapsing towers were the result of controlled demolition. These are not alleged terrorists in this case, as you are not an alleged Mental Deficient, as for me I take the word allege out of both you and the accused, thus confirming both as fact.
I do thank you for your comments, and hope you continue in expressing your embarassing pointless views on Now Public.
Truemors
Sign in to NowPublic
at 00:45 on April 3rd, 2008
I guess you being from Tarantaw, says it all.
You state, It is frightening that the public can become so scared of governmental 'boogeymen', that they would actually call for a re-examination of the Canadian death penalty.
I state in my story if ever a terrorist act like this ever comes to fruition on Canadian soil then a rexamination of the Death Penalty should be looked at.
You also state that "May I remind the author of this article, that nothing actually happened in this case of 'terrorism', contrary to what you imply with the opening line of your article. This case is still progressing through the courts, in which all suspects are innocent until proven guilty."
I state to you, the reason it did not go through is our Intelligence service caught them before they could act. Do you feel they must behead our Prime Minister to prove your point?
You further state "Let us remember that the sensational allegations from the government are just that - allegations. They remain to be proven, and the government has a long history of claiming such sensational things without any basis.
I state with knowledge that these terrorist are caught "Dead to Rights" so it is safe to state a fact they were in progress to act, this from telephone conversations, emails, computer hard drive info etc. As for being alleged terrorists, that is like saying you are an alleged Mental Deficient, when your rants of 9-11 collapsing towers were the result of controlled demolition. These are not alleged terrorists in this case, as you are not an alleged Mental Deficient, as for me I take the word allege out of both you and the accused, thus confirming both as fact.
I do thank you for your comments, and hope you continue in expressing your embarassing pointless views on Now Public.