NP Rank:
British Columbia: Marijuana grow-ops growing bigger and going rural
Opinion
Barry Artiste, Now Public Contributor
My hit parade on Grow Op busts were the busiest in Coquitlam in 2002-2004, then Abbotsford 2004-2006 with Surrey from 2005-2007, and now I am finding myself having to drive as far away as Chilliwack and Hope in the 2007. This certainly jibes with the Surrey Study. What I like about Surrey are their $10,000.00 a day fines, most times resulting in criminals losing their homes. This certainly takes the profitability out of the hands of the Criminals. I get more calls and visits than I care to remember from these Grow Operators and so called innocent landlords whose tragic tale of woe state to me to be easy on them,and speak to the municipalities on their behalf on reducing or eliminating their fines, because they are losing their homes and their families will become homeless. First of all I tell them putting young children and exposing them to this criminal and toxic environment elicit no pity from me. In addition, when doing a background check of their properties, most times I find this is not their first offence, hence I tell them to get into another line of work, and direct them to the nearest shelter.
Now Public Readers may feel I am a cynic, but you should know these private Drug Barons pay no taxes on their alternate sources of income which amount in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, they serve little or no jail time, they usually get their children back, and rarely face deportation. They also endanger me and everyone who has to enter their toxic and sometimes booby trapped homesand properties. So in ending my biggest satisfaction is watching them leave my office and stand outside waiting for the bus, with the East Hastings crowd all around them, sort of gives them a taste of Karma to stand amongst those whose destruction of human lives they have wrought on them which now surround them. Yep, Good Times. "NOT". Welcome to my world.
My Final Thought
Surrey by far though is the highest when it comes to Methamphetamine Labs, with Meth operators travelling as far as Mission to dump their toxic waste.
Marijuana grow-ops growing bigger and going ruralBy Kent Spencer, The Province
Published: Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Crime analysis shows marijuana grow operations are moving to bigger houses, hiding behind more bushes and growing more dope than ever.
The grow-ops' changing profile has emerged in response to authorities' crackdowns, says RCMP crime analyst Parvir Girn.
"Grow-ops tend to be located on properties five times the average lot size," she said. "This was [likely] the result of efforts to avoid detection."
Girn, 31, a civilian member of Surrey's force, spent eight months crunching numbers from 1,087 Surrey grow-ops busted during 2004-06. The result was a master's thesis for the University College of the Fraser Valley and a report to Surrey council on Monday.
In it, she said police green teams and non-traditional approaches such as electrical inspections have prompted growers' changing tactics.
The report says that the average grow-op house is on an 18,113-square-foot lot. "Producers increase production and minimize detection," said Girn.
She said police find it harder to obtain grounds for a search warrant at a large property because they must remain off-site while making observations.
Girn found the average grow-op has expanded from 257 plants to 488, with 178 per cent more lights.
"Everything seems to be getting bigger," said RCMP Sgt. Scott Rintoul. "We're seeing export shipments of 500 pounds instead of 50."
Grow-ops use more than 93 kw/h of electricity per day, three times normal consumption. And they are 24 times more likely to catch fire than ordinary houses.
Homes are guarded by dogs, "deliberate booby traps," guns and axes. Rintoul said the weapons are not directed at the public but designed to thwart ripoffs.
Convicted operators are likely to serve sentences of "a few months." The industry is estimated to bring in at least $2 billion annually in B.C.
Surrey Mayor Dianne Watts said B.C. is a "world leader" in the distribution of illicit drugs.
"Surrey has taken aggressive action," she said. "The number of grow-ops has been reduced from 900 to 40. We're seeing some success."
Grow-ops are moving away from urban areas of the Lower Mainland to the Fraser Valley and beyond.
The number of Vancouver grow-ops "coming to police attention" is down 43 per cent, compared with 2004-06; Burnaby is down 29 per cent; Mission is up 37 per cent and Abbotsford up 32 per cent.
"They're going where a bigger piece of property may draw less attention," said Rintoul. "They're thinking maybe 10 grow houses are at less at risk of detection than 15."
Rintoul can draw an "indirect" connection to gang activity and shootings in the Lower Mainland.
"Probably 80 per cent of organized-crime groups are involved in marijuana," he said.
Electrical inspections have been helpful in preventing the re-establishment of grow-ops after a bust.
Girn found the likelihood of a startup again in Surrey was almost zero after a visit from RCMP or an electrical inspector. She credited a bylaw which can impose fines of $10,000 per day.
Port Moody, Delta, Coquitlam, Langley, Maple Ridge and Abbotsford are using some of the same techniques.
kspencer@png.canwest.com
News Tools
December 20, 2007 at 10:35 am by Barry Artiste, 2144 views, 5 comments
Crowd Power
-
Barry Artiste
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada






Add a comment
Comments (5)
- reply
ryanat 13:03 on December 20th, 2007
Barry Artiste, a growing problem indeed! thanks for the contribution and the personal insight.
at 13:06 on December 20th, 2007
Good stuff.
at 13:07 on December 20th, 2007
Barry Artiste, really cool photos, and your personal experience adds weight to this article.
at 15:08 on December 20th, 2007
Barry Artiste, thanks for sharing your perspective. NP staffers and regular readers are aware that you work in law enforcement (and your photos here show you, as well) but do you think you might be able to mention this in the piece? It's a bit confusing for the average reader as you don't directly state you work in law enforcement in your piece. Just a line or two would help.
Thanks! Great work! Interesting stuff.
at 20:02 on December 20th, 2007
Thanks everyone, for the record though, as my profile states I advise and perform work on behalf of government and corporate agencies etc. Though not a police officer, as the work I do would be too expensive for my clients to retain me full time. I providing direction and advice and available as an expert witness for unamed agencies in identifying illegal drugs for further evidence for the courts. Thats pretty much all I can say on the subject, privacy concerns in regards to my clients do not allow me to elaborate further, sorry.