FBI Investigates After Officer Uses Taser On Pregnant Woman

by ifindtrends | November 29, 2007 at 03:08 pm
579 views | 20 Recommendations | 3 comments

What? No posts about this yet on Now Public?


In the article the police said that she did not disclose that she was pregnant. My question is why would they need to taser her in the first place.


It says that the one officer had forced her on her stomach. If she was lying on her stomach, why would he feel threatened enough to have to use the taser?

The video is here http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=daf_1196362820 

TROTWOOD, Ohio -- The FBI is investigating after a Trotwood police officer used a Taser on a pregnant woman.

Trotwood Public Safety Director Michael Etter said the incident happened on Nov. 18. He said the woman arrived at the police department asking to give up custody of her 1-year-old son.

Etter said his officer spoke with the woman as she held on to the child outside the police department.

"(He) attempted to obtain information on both the mother and the child, at which time the mother refused to give any information and became very agitated," Etter said.

Surveillance video from the police department shows the woman try to leave with the child. The officer then grabs her coat in an effort to get her to stop. Etter said the officer was doing what he thought was in the best interest of the 1-year-old boy.

The video shows the woman struggle with the officer, who then takes the child from her and gives the boy to another officer. The first officer then forces the woman down on her stomach, and he then deploys a Taser on her neck.

Etter said the officer did not know the woman was pregnant.

"She did not disclose, even after she was arrested, that she was pregnant," Etter said. He said the woman was wearing a large winter coat and had her child on her lap when she was talking to the officer.

Etter said the department is cooperating with the FBI investigation, and there is also an ongoing internal investigation to see if the use of force was warranted for the situation.

Etter said the officer involved is still on duty.

Trotwood's use of force policy states officers should "greatly evaluate each situation with discretion when anticipating the deployment of the Taser on young children, elderly persons, and pregnant females."

News Center 7 spoke with the woman involved in the case, but she declined the opportunity to make a statement, saying only that she feels "unjustly served."

Officers said the 1-year-old boy was put into the custody of a family member after the incident.

Related Nowpublic Posts : http://www.nowpublic.com/tag/Taser

Oh and don't forget about this one. I am not sure if there is a NowPublic post on it already. I could not find one.

Video: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ab9_1195012238 

Dash Cam Video Catches Police Forcing a Pregnant
Woman to Lie in the Street

Elementary
school principal Yvette Hayes will never forget the night of July 13,
2007. She was pregnant at the time and believes police jeopardized the
life of her unborn child.



When Hayes was pulled over in the Kansas City suburb of Independence,
Mo., on Interstate 70, she thought it was a routine stop. "I'm thinking
they'd ask for my driver's license," she said.





Instead, police drew guns on the five months' pregnant mother — whose
two children were in the back seat of the car — and told her to lie on
the ground.



"Get your hands up," one officer shouted while another ordered her to
"go down on to your belly. Arms out to your side! Palms up, palms up!"



Shocked and sobbing, all Hayes could say was, "I'm pregnant."



Hayes had just left a local JCPenney, where a store security guard
misidentified her green Jeep as a vehicle involved in stealing cars
from the parking lot.



"I was lying on I-70 on my belly, trucks going by at least 70 miles," Hayes said.



Police Chief Responds



Fred Mills, chief of the Independence Police Department, said Friday on
"Good Morning America" that people should listen to the full audio and
video of the incident before forming an opinion.



"As soon as the officer realized -- and you can listen to the tape and
that's why it's important that you listen to all the circumstances --
as soon as the officer realized, you hear the officer say, 'She's
pregnant,'" Mills said. "They immediately got Mrs. Hayes up off the
ground. And at the very most Mrs. Hayes was on the ground for 45
seconds."



Minutes after realizing their mistake, officers helped the distraught woman up.



"Again, listen to the demeanor of the officers," Mills said. "Listen to
how they talk to her. They were apologetic. They were caring. They were
compassionate. Not only to Mrs. Hayes but to her children."



The video camera caught the police as they tried to recover from the incident.



"What's your 4-year-old's name?" one officer asked in an attempt to
calm her. "We're going to wait for you regain your composure and let
you go back up to your car to your babies. They don't want to see mommy
sad."



The officers are then captured talking between themselves.



"I'll do a report on this to cover our a--," the officer said. "If they
got a black male suspect, they need to be sure they got a black male
driver so I don't traumatize a very pregnant woman anymore and put her
on the side of I-70."





Mills said that there was nothing to "cover up" about the incident.



"That's a mischaracterization of what was said. You're taking an unfortunate phrase that was used out of context," he said.



Hayes' supporters say the department store singled her out because of
her race. Police say they followed procedure, but simply made a mistake.



Hayes also says she never got an apology from JCPenney.



In July, Hayes filed a lawsuit alleging that the Independence Police
Department didn't release the videotape to her attorney in a timely
manner.



Officials released copies of the tape to Hayes' attorney July 26,
nearly two weeks after the incident, according to the Jackson County
Examiner/Daily Record.



Missouri "Sunshine" law required the tape to be released less than
three days after her lawyer's initial request on July 18. Independence
police deny violating open records law.



"I don't want this to happen to anyone," she said. "If you ever had
guns pointed at you, it's a horrible feeling.

 

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
Jordan Yerman
Jordan Yerman
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 15:30 on November 29th, 2007

I'm mainly surprised that, in the midst of the media frenzy surrounding Tazer use, the penny hasn't dropped with individual police officers: A) their less-lethal weapon may not be all that less lethal, and B) this sort of thing, well, attracts media attention!

0
ifindtrends

I agree. It's definatley a HOT topic right now and cameras are everywhere.

Rob Walker
Rob Walker
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 09:36 on November 30th, 2007

Good find trends, scary stuff to be sure.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from