NP Rank:
Ohio Police: Strip Search Gone Bad
You have to watch the video that goes with this post - it's absolutely chilling. CLICK HERE FOR VIDEO
"Stark
County, Ohio police are under investigation over the use of excessive
force for strip-searching Hope Steffey. Yet, this is not the only case
in recent months of what is being deemed as an illegal strip-search.
The department is also facing accusations by three young teenage
girls ages 14, 15 and 16 that say that they too were illegally
strip-searched on May 18, 2007 for what the officers deemed as being
for "their own safety." (For further information:In Depth Coverage of the Incident)
But let's not stop there. A Stark County police officer is also up
for capital murder after he strangled his pregnant girlfriend to death,
rolled her body up in a rug, and then dumped her body some twenty miles
away. (For further information:Police Officer Murders Pregnant Girlfriend )
Could this be an out of control police department?"



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (8)
at 11:34 on September 1st, 2008
Just look at the way this thing plays out and is handled.
The original investigation goes from being a domestic dispute, to an argument between the deputy and Steffy, about her dead sister’s license, after he testified in court that he felt that she "disrespected" him.
The deputy can argue that only ‘reasonable force’ was used when he threw her on the hood and broke her tooth. And then threw her on the ground hard enough that she was bleeding from her nose. Was it reasonable?
He testified that he only pushed her against the car and ‘swung’ her to the ground. So how do you break someone’s tooth, have them bleeding from their nose and bulge a disk in their back, by just a shove against a car and swinging them to the ground?
All the witnesses said he lifted her in an armbar and slammed her on the car. And that he then body slammed her to the ground with great force.
He says that he used all this force, because she was "resisting arrest".
Later in the trial he admits that Steffy slipped a hand out of her cuffs, but she TELLS him about it and never tries to escape! (Or resist without her arm being in a arm bar.)
Reasonable Force? I don't think so, I think he realized this and why he then changed this to a charge against Steffy, to cover himself. Too bad the video camera wasn’t on, even though the officer has a remote body mic & remote control for the video recorder, which he could have turned on at ANYTIME!
This point isn't reasonable, but I guess could be viewed as arguable.
We have Steffy declared suicidal. A experienced psychiatrist can NOT tell when someone is suicidal, but their doctor claims to do it, in seconds, with a few questions? And sometimes over the phone?? When’s the last time a doctor would diagnose and prescribe for you over the phone?? Malpractice for sure and maybe criminal!
Another arguable point.
We have disputes about if she was asked to remove her clothes. I haven’t seen any video of them asking. (And now we are told the camera was “not working”, after a hall video CLEARLY shows the LED screen on.)
Very doubtful, but maybe arguable.
Then we have Steffy, allegedly, attacked by cops at the station after the question of being suicidal, which she NEVER answers! Instead, she asks questions.
Again arguable, with no video.
Both cops had the SAME testimony on her staggering, being drunk and slurring her words. Yet the backup cop then goes on to testify that he didn't get there till they were putting her into the back seat!
Plus other PROSECUTION witnesses testified she was speaking 'Crystal Clear'.
Then we have the video of Steffy asking the cops "what they are doing" and trying to tell them that "she didn't do anything wrong", do you hear her 'slur her words'? I don't.
And after you claim that someone is that drunk doesn't a breathalyser report to support this seem reasonable? None was ever done.
So this isn’t arguable, unless they come up with more video. (Seems hardly likely!!)
This is where the cop’s version of things starts to unravel.
And then we have men helping to forcibly strip a handcuffed woman.
By LAW, they can’t be present during a strip search, body cavity search, or even supposed to be where they can SEE women in the showers, but Swanson’s “policy” ‘SAYS’ its ‘ok’ for men to not only VIEW a forced stripping naked of a woman in a ‘suicide prevention’, they are allowed to PARTICIPATE and help remove her cloths!!!
HUH?!?!? All these laws to keep men away, but Swanson wants us to believe that THIS “policy” he dreamed up is “OK”, because he SAYS so!?!?? Does this sound logical and reasonable? (Or moral?) (Has Sheriff Swanson had a mental evaluation lately?)
Also Swanson can argue that it is allowed, but WHY was it done by men when there were enough women there?
Also why not a restraint chair?(With Steffy having a broken tooth, a bulged disk in her back, ears ripped open, bruises & abrasions and being traumatized for life, please don’t try saying a restraint chair is more dangerous.)
Why THIS controversial way to handle it? Even correctional mental health officials say this is highly controversial method.
Why do the 3 men STAY in the cell after she is stripped naked and the women have left?
Why are they moving her around on the bunk and manipulating her legs in different positions?
Why is it done repeatedly?
So what is their explanation or excuse for all of this?
This is the point where all the logic, reasonableness, and the plausibility of the sheriff and deputy’s story is REALLY falling apart.
Then the killer blow to their excuses, that they were not abusing Steffy, they were "just doing their job", to "save her life" is what happens next.
THEY LEAVE HER NAKED!
Their excuse?
"She was TOO suicidal for a suicide suit."
Huh? TOO suicidal for a garment DESIGNED for this situation??!?!
TOO suicidal for even a paper covering??
I never saw this in the video, all I saw was a traumatized woman who was humiliated, embarrassed and scared to death.
THIS is where the lies catch up to them.
THIS is where all the speculation of what was REALLY happening turns.
THIS is where we find out what was REALLY going on, and whose version of events to believe.
THIS is NOT an arguable point; THIS is NOT up for speculation.
THIS was done to punish, humiliate, and degrade Hope Steffy under the "color of law".
============================================
I applaud the courage of Hope Steffy and the others that have come forward with their own stories of abuse at the hands of Stark County police.
I don't know many people that would want video like that all over the news & net, so that this abuse can be stopped, before it happens to others.
I just hope people don't waste the sacrifice these people have made for us.
at 18:48 on September 17th, 2008
Elizabeth Gould tell lies all the times she mean and nasty and bossy and hateful
she treat miranda gould and tanya smith and tracy applyn and cathy gould and larlene foote bad
Elizabeth Gould made miranda gould cry
Elizabeth Gould saying things to Miranda Gould
Bonnie Gould steels and bomming and nasty and bossy and acting up like a 2 yrs old and tell lies all the times she cause trouble and rip people off
she throw temper tantrums
she treat miranda gould and cathy gould and tracy applyn and larlene foote bad
Bonnie Gould and Elizabeth Gould love to kill people
her and elizabeth are hateful and have the bad manners
at 19:00 on September 17th, 2008
Bonnie Gould rape Larlene Foote
at 17:06 on October 11th, 2008
Well the CantonRep paper has posted ALL the strip video, or what they claim to have of it. Unbelievable!
http://www.cantonrep.com/index.php?ID=433316&r=0&Category=15&subCategoryID=0
Officials at Stark County & the State saying they could see nothing wrong with this video. And a few people on other sites have agreed with them!
BUT just so we’re all on the same page, lets review the video….
First of all, this video STARTS after Steffy is already forced down on the bunk. The camera operator tells investigators she doesn’t know WHY the whole recording isn’t there. And the piece that is “missing” is exactly when Steffy claimed she was never asked to remove her cloths & was assaulted by the staff. No problems with the ‘magic’ camera…RIGHT?
Plus what Swanson & the officials are saying is that not only is it ok for 8 people, men & women to be present, the men are also allowed to remove a woman’s cloths. EVEN if there are enough women there to do it.
And if a woman ‘reacts’ to being stripped by men & women, with spectators also standing there, while being videoed, the men are not ONLY allowed to RESTRAIN her, they are also allowed to pull her arms in submission holds, while yelling for her to “STOP IT”.
And then AFTER she is already stripped naked, its STILL ok for the men to put her in an arm bar submission hold, if she starts screaming while they force her crossed legs against her butt, while waiting to “change a mat”.
And its also ok for the camera, which is supposed to be on the prisoner at ALL times, to deliberately swing away so you can’t tell what they are doing to her. No problem here too RIGHT?
===== Yeah, just having a couple men TWICE her size, and a couple women, JUST restraining her isn’t enough, if she doesn’t cooperate, they can also TORTURE her into SUBMISSION. =====
And then once they leave, these “professionals” can have a good laugh…I guess they didn’t realize the camera was STILL running.
THIS is what ALL the Swanson supporters are good with…RIGHT?
Because Swanson and the “investigators” are OK with it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDRsCkc-9k0
at 17:26 on October 11th, 2008
That's F'd up
at 06:51 on December 30th, 2008
You have no idea HOW F'd up it really is. There is so much more to this story and what I have run into, looking into it.
I have had the sheriff's dept hang up on me while talking, I have had them lie outright to me, and I have had them avoid questions with BS answers.
Plus their excuses make no sense for what was done.
This seems to be one big coverup.
at 20:34 on April 16th, 2009
I can't stand institutionalised crime... It's an abomination.
Being forcibly striped off your clothes, probed and poked by a gang of strangers and publicly humilated on camera!! and for no good reason!! is enough reason to turn totally violent... It's called SELF DEFENCE!
All those cops are ROTTEN sex offenders and this is tantamount to rape. After such an ordeal, life ceases to have meaning. A person never fully recovers from this. It would haunt you forever.
If this had to happen to me or my loved ones, heads would roll!.. mine or theirs! Someone would surely go under over this... If the court won't do it, I would! It would become my newly found ambition in life.
Stella
at 06:07 on July 16th, 2009
This case has now been settled out of court but questions must still be asked about actions of officer holdin and opening legs of Hope Steffey to search initially for tampon and then a cavity search. This information did not seem to be given to Grand Jury ho probably made their decision aplying evidence required to overcome a Qualified Immunity Plea by certain officers.