NP Rank:
Vancouver: "Brian Laidlaw" accused of "Crossing the Line" among Thieves.
Opinion
Barry Artiste, Now Public Contributor
20-year Career Criminal and Junkie Brian Laidlaw, is believed to have "crossed a line" even Junkies and Thieves dare not cross. There is even a "Code of Ethics" even among thieves, strange as it sounds.
Brian Laidlaw you see, is accused of taking the opportunity to skulk the halls of BC's Sick Children's Hospital.
Brian Laidlaw has been accused of looking for easy pickings found his "Holy Grail" for his next fix in the room of a very sick child whereby like the "Cancerous Cockroach" he is, started to frantically fill his own "Xmas Holiday Knapsack" with this sick child's belongings, a portable DVD player and Video Camera, the mother upon entering and challenging him with her screams did not deter Brian Laidlaw from his appointed rounds, as he escaped to pawn his pre Christmas Loot at a nearby DTES Pawn Shop.
The police are actively seeking Brian Laidlaw, as he has been positively identifed by the mother and police have him "on Video".
Until Police apprehend this suspected 'Cancer on Society', there will be no Mission, Soup Kitchen, Gang of Thieves or Darkened Back Alley Brian will be able to slink off to without detection by his Peers or Police.
If caught, Brian Laidlaws chances of going to Jail will be slim to none in a multi decades Canadian Society where Criminal Justice seems non existent for Criminals. Perhaps though, if even for a Moral Moment, his "Gang of Peers and Drug Dealers", (I am sure have children of their own) in the Spirit of Christmas will spare the Police and citizens of Vancouver the trouble of catching and punishing "Brian Laidlaw" and provide some much needed "Street Justice", after all it is the least they could do to appease a disheartend public.
Search for hospital thiefBrian Laidlaw, 39, pawned items he allegedly stole from a sick girl in B.C. Children's Hospital
The Vancouver Sun
Published: Monday, December 03, 2007
VANCOUVER - Vancouver Police are requesting the public's assistance in locating the man who stole a digital camera and a portable DVD from a patient at B.C. Children's Hospital, the VPD said in a press release Monday.
Bryan John Laidlaw, 39, had earlier been chased out of B.C. Women's Hospital and Health Centre on Oak Street by staff who suspected he was a thief after they caught him skulking around some of their wards, the release said. He later showed up next door at B.C. Children's Hospital, where a woman returning to her daughter's room found him allegedly packing the girl's DVD player and digital camera into his backpack. Although the patient's mother yelled at him, the man continued his actions and then ran out of the hospital, police said.
"We are horrified," said Cst. Tim Fanning, who said many of the photos on the camera were images of the girl in hospital and of the medical staff who have been helping her. "The incident was heart-wrenching for the officers who took the call. Not only was this stolen from the hospital, but it was stolen from a family with a very sick 17-year-old girl," he said in the release.
Laidlaw allegedly pawned the stolen electronics, under his real name, at the AAA Pawnbrokers in the 3000 block Main Street. Pawn shops in the city of Vancouver are required to enter the serial numbers of property and information about the seller into the Xtract system, a property-tracking database which is accessed by the police department.
Jackie Thomas, a civilian working with the VPD Anti-Fencing Unit, checked Xtract for the stolen items and quickly found where they had been pawned. Hospital security video of Laidlaw also matched existing VPD photos of Laidlaw, who is well known to them - he has a criminal record dating back to 1987 for a number of offences, police said.
The equipment has now been returned to the grateful family. However, Laidlaw, who is wanted for theft and for possession of stolen property, is still at large. He is described as 5'7" tall and 150 lbs., with short brown hair and likely cocaine sores on his face.
Anybody who knows Laidlaw's whereabouts is asked to call 9-1-1.




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 06:55 on December 4th, 2007
Barry, I have some pretty serious concerns about this article.
I would personally be hesistant to call someone 'scum' in a headline, as a personal attack isn't a very effective way to tell a story. The larger issue (and the reason I'm mentioning this) is that you seem to be convicting him before he has even been arrested. As journalists we have to be very careful not to judge or convict someone, that's for the courts to decide. Our personal beliefs (no matter how strong or justified) should not colour our coverage of any event.
For example: "The police are actively seeking Brian Laidlaw, these is no suspected or accused Tag for Brian, they have him "Dead to Rights"
There is no such thing in Canadian law as 'dead to rights'. Just like in America, citizens here are innocent until proven guilty. While this is a good story and I hope they catch him and he is sentenced, I don't agree with the comments or headline for this story. Also, there may even be libel issues.
at 07:33 on December 4th, 2007
Hello Rob, on your part, as a voice of reason, I have complied. On the other hand media (Talk Radio) here and the public comments have stated choice words I am not allowed to put into print on Now Public and would not do so anyways. I used my inner Hallmark Voice the best I could when writing this Opinion page. Tags such as accused or dead to rights seemed appropriate as the media clearly stated he was id'ed and video taped, how else could he be construed as innocent. Anyhoo, upon reflection I changed my story, but not my opinion.
Thanks for the comment.
Barry
at 08:17 on December 4th, 2007
Thanks for updating your story Barry.
One of the most difficult aspects of this work is trying to remain as unbiased and neutral as possible when writing, despite the sometimes overwhelming evidence that someone might indeed be a terrible person. We simply must put the information forth as factually as possible and let the reader decide.
When I get really annoyed about something, I'll usually post the news story and then post an opinion piece on it, linking it for context. That always seems to me to be a fair tradeoff between transparency and the reality of the world we live in. It lets people see my perspective and possible agendas/leanings while still giving a clear picture of what's going on.
At the very least it lets people know that we won't let personal opinion cloud our judgment while writing stories.
Thanks again.
at 16:31 on December 4th, 2007
Thanks for the tip Rob