Adbusters Sues Canwest and Government of Canada

by candidusmaximus | January 9, 2008 at 11:12 pm
1045 views | 34 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

Adbusters Sues Canwest and Government of Canada

Adbusters Sues Canwest and Government of Canada

see larger image

uploaded by candidusmaximus

Freedom of Expression Is The Issue Says The BC Anti-Consumerism Group


Adbusters, the Vancouver-based anti-consumerism group and Canwest, Canada's media giant, went before a judge of the BC Supreme Court Monday and Tuesday. At issue is whether the lawsuit filed in 2004 by Adbusters will proceed to trial or be dismissed as requested in a motion filed by Canwest, the owner of Global Television network.


Adbusters, a non-profit organisation that boasts of 140,000 members in British Columbia, filed the lawsuit in 2004 against Canwest, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) and the Canadian Radio Television Commission (CRTC) after its TV "non-commercials" were rejected. The organisaton says the real issue is freedom of expression as guaranteed under the Charter of Rights, and intends to pursue a similar action in the United States if its litigation is successful in Canada. CRTC is targeted by the action for allegedly allowing the monopolisation of Canada's airwaves in the hands of a handful of corporations.


One of the issues that are yet to be determined is whether the CRTC is part of the Government of Canada or an independent entity for judicial purposes. It was represented at the court hearing by the office of the Attorney General of Canada. Ryan Dalziel, Adbusters' legal counsel, accused the government of flip flopping on the question of whether the CRTC is part of the government or an independent entity that has to be sued as a separate party. His motion, which the judge found confusing, called on the court to make a finding at this stage.


The judge reserved his decision.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Jordan Yerman
Jordan Yerman
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 05:28 on January 10th, 2008

I'm not sure if "freedom of expression" covers advertising, which has a distinctly commercial purpose, but this case definitely shines a light on the decisionmaking process behind which ads get seen and which do not. I don't get to check out Adbusters too often, but I like how they take up ad space (and shelf space) in order to get people to *not* buy stuff. I don't think the courts know quite what to do with that.

Jarrett Martineau
Jarrett Martineau
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 12:49 on January 11th, 2008

I like the idea of 'non-commercials' - I guess the retail equivalent would be shopdropping?

mtippett
mtippett
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 17:22 on January 11th, 2008


Rick Taberzika
Rick Taberzika
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 09:11 on January 21st, 2008

candidusmaximus, I like this story. It's good stuff.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from