NP Rank:
Balloon Boy Story: "Who the Hell is Wolf?" Sums Up Hoax
The Balloon Boy story isn't just about a fame-hungry guy willing to exploit his six-year-old boy. It's also about a media industry unable to blink in the face of a spectacle, and so unable to critically assess whether or not they are looking at a real story. Richard Heene knew this, which is why his plan to gain worldwide attention with the Balloon Boy hoax, for better or worse, worked like a charm. The Heene family's opinion of the media is perfectly captured in this video clip, in which, when told they're being interviewed by CNN and to say hello to Wolf Blitzer, a younger Falcon Heene replies, "Who the hell is Wolf?".
It's easy (and natural) for us to ask, "What the hell were they thinking?" It's hard to imagine a scenario in which the Heenes got away with their scheme for too long. Expecting a six-year-old to keep it together in the face of worldwide media scrutiny was only one of the flaws: the tensile strength of cardboard, and its inability to hold a small person aloft, was another.
But are we learning anything we don't already know? We flock to human-interest stories because they're easier to parse than the electoral landscape in Afghanistan. Richard Heene knew this because we taught him: his family saw the junk-food fame of reality TV twice on Wife Swap. Richard Heene and his family didn't respect TV media- why should they? The Heenes knew that they were in the driver's seat. Now the Heenes will likely face charges over the Balloon Boy hoax- even if the media didn't pay attention at all, emergency services would still be deployed, and rescue helicopters ain't cheap.
So let that be the first lesson on the Balloon Boy boondoggle - it's a waste of time to find fault with U.S. cable TV news channels. Any moral indignation is misplaced. Human-interest stories will trump politics and policy stories every time.
That sort of lust for fame is pretty much pathetic, but exploiting a kid like that? We, as a culture, need to make a habit of not rewarding that. We need to understand that, just because something is stupid, that doesn't mean that someone won't try it.
In the meantime, if you want to see a real balloon boy, you have to go back to 1964.
NowPublic on Facebook
Recommendations (17)
-
jakesylvester1
Holland Landing, Ontario, Canada -
Hugh Askew
Omaha, Nebraska, United States -
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
Redwater, Alberta, Canada 
Anonymous user



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 10:43 on October 20th, 2009
The irony is that he will probably make a pile of money over this. He is now a celebrity, although not a pretty one.
at 10:44 on October 20th, 2009
I guess, when wishing to become famous, he neglected to include "... and loved by the public".
at 11:24 on October 20th, 2009
The media, especially the "news" media, are ofte-called 'watch dogs.' Their sense of smell is obviously not very well developed these days. Mr. and Mrs. Heene are of course the true culprits here, but at what point do we start to hold the media accountable for the video bloodlust they have inculcated in the America? Shouldn't these channels feel a little embarrassed at how they were played? Or is it their 'duty' to report events first and ask questions later? I for one really believed the story was true as it was happening, and was very happy when the little boy was found alive later on. I am either naive or non-cycnical I guess.....
at 14:23 on October 20th, 2009
Being quick with a potential story is more important than being quick to report the news. Television and social media channels need and want something to talk about. The topic is more important than the substance as there are plenty of people who are willing to fill in the content. A non news story morphs into a new story because people are willing to talk about. The boy's father knows this well, being a reality television celebirty and all. Now, the six year old is on some path charted by his father probably to an insitution of maximum security eventually. Give the real story time to develop.