NP Rank:
Beck takes on MSNBC
On October 14 pundit Glenn Beck took on MSNBC, satirically mocking the likes of Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews and calling the news network one "devoted to singing [Obama's] praises".
If only he had a bit more depth and subtlety, he might make his points effectively. He is a bit too boyish and overplayed for the subtle and the discerning:
Glenn Beck mocked his cable news competitors Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews Wednesday afternoon on his Fox News show."The president has an entire network devoted to singing his praises," Beck said of MSNBC. "There's a guy on at night I love, and he's like Shakespearean. He is waxing poetic about his oratory skills, writing soliloquies," he said, showing off his impression of Olbermann.
"And then another guy's like, 'I've got a thrill going up my leg' when they just hear him speak." he said of Matthews. "It's incredible!"
Beck also knocked the network news broadcasts and "Saturday Night Live," claiming they haven't been tough on Obama.
Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/glenn-beck-mocks-keith-ol_n_321837.html
Recommendations (39)
-
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States -
albertacowpoke
Canada 
Anonymous user
-
Barry Artiste
Vancouver, Canada -
Hugh Askew
Omaha, Nebraska, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (25)
at 04:06 on October 15th, 2009
Beck is correct in pointing this out. The White House has engaged in attacking FOX. MSNBC, particuarly Christ Matthews has had a trickle running down his leg whenever he speaks of President Obama.
Journalism at its best, I suppose.
Beck is comical and sometimes can't be taken seriously, however the Administration obviously sees him as a threat.
Beck has his followers and despite the attempts to discredit him and the disengagement of sponsors seems to continue to rack up ratings.
at 07:30 on October 15th, 2009
I think Beck is a bit too much 'in your face'
at 18:19 on October 15th, 2009
Yes, Amy !....as much as he gives some good information it is lost from his hyper drama and .. He wears...I am searching my brain here. he is typical of the "lost child" ...Please love me. aren't I cute... I want EVERYONE TO LOVE ME!! Of course in his case it is a particular group.
They need to give him some "downer's ....................just kidding. Actually I have already written about one of the archetypes he is of which can be many ...he is "the Fool" but he wants to be a "savior " too.....He is the kinda guy who does not know boundaries .
I still support most of his ideology...about the constitution etc.
at 07:51 on October 15th, 2009
Well, he is there to reinforce the actions of what used to be called "the Silent Majority", the average Tea Party protester.
So, he is not "our kind of person". For me, too, but he does do a fantastic job of arming us with facts about the modern left and their takeover of our executive branch and a great big chunk of our legislative branch as well.
His modest looks and exaggerated manner assure us that he won't be able to create a cult of personality around himself and his manner also tells us that he doesn't want to do that.
Too bad Obama lacks that as a feature of his personality.
at 09:07 on October 15th, 2009
Roy: I think Obama comes by his charisma honestly and naturally: He is one of those "manna from heaven" archetypal men, and he cannot help it, and does not try to consciously cultivate his cult status, others do this for him, and he receives it. Beck reminds me of Eminem: almost "white trash" but it is endearing and he has that "boy next door" and "little boy lost" appeal---but he is just too over the top and his ideas are ill-conceived. He has every right to take on Olbermann and Matthews, but he is just "off" in some way, and I cannot quite put my finger on his deficiency. I am not against him, though, I mean, I "get" him to a certain degree. (btw, Peake and panel is shaping up, will tell you when I am less busy) smk
at 10:03 on October 15th, 2009
I look forward to hearing about this. I am immune to charisma. I mean it. I don't even care about pro sports, let alone "stars".
Charisma is a gift. Political philosophy he uses: a bastardization of what works for the narcissism mojo.
at 09:22 on October 15th, 2009
Oh yeah, this guys a genius I tell ya, a genius. He speaks for the "silent majority." More like a bunch of loud mouthed, rude people. I saw multiple cases of this silent majority's behavior during the town hall forums on health care. Spare me!
I can't wait for Olbeman, and more than likely, John Stewart's reaction to this guy. They'll eat him live, and Beck won't need any Vick's for the crying jag that will follow.
at 13:29 on October 15th, 2009
nanute,
Not certain, but i don't think the Tea Baggers are the ones who have displayed their manners at numerous G7/8 meetings.
I mean, my, aren't they the well behaved bunch!
Burning cars, riots, defacing property............... the Tea Bag folks have a lot to learn about "rude".
To assume that he speaks for the folks at the Tea Bag meetings, leaves one to assume that Olberman & Matthews speak for the G8 protesters.......except we both know that isn't true.
at 13:30 on October 15th, 2009
Hugh, let me (gently) remind you about using the term "Tea Baggers". Thanks:)!
at 13:53 on October 15th, 2009
ooop. my bad. will i get sent to re-education camp?
at 14:32 on October 15th, 2009
Maybe:)! Thanks!
at 10:36 on October 15th, 2009
Thanks for this, smk. I agree with albertacowpoke in so far as "...the Administration obviously sees him as a threat."
And, like Roy, I am 'immune' to charisma as well.
On your comment:
"I think Obama comes by his charisma honestly and naturally: He is one of those "manna from heaven" archetypal men, and he cannot help it, and does not try to consciously cultivate his cult status, others do this for him, and he receives it."
Charisma is a skill or an art -- It seems that President Obama has developed his.
How to be Charismatic
at 11:21 on October 15th, 2009
Thanks for that link Rhonda:). Charisma is about to be developed:)
at 11:32 on October 15th, 2009
You are very welcome:)! Although I think I know what you mean, I'll pass on any comment:)!
at 10:41 on October 15th, 2009
Say it ain't so, Rhonda. Just say it ain't so.....*sob* :( smk
at 10:52 on October 15th, 2009
Wish I could:)!
at 11:08 on October 15th, 2009
I don't believe people who have an atmosphere or quality about them, set out to be "charismatic." There is a field of energy that emanates from them and draws others in. This can be both positive or negative energy. Descriptions of these kind of people are: 1) whenever they are speaking, it's like they are speaking directly to you; 2) when they come into a room their presence dominates; 3) we tend to either believe them completely or disbelieve them vehemently.
How many of the most talked about people here fit into those categories?
at 11:14 on October 15th, 2009
And A211 brings back hope! Obama is on top again! :)
at 12:42 on October 15th, 2009
Some would think so:)!
at 11:25 on October 15th, 2009
Woah! The process of humanity's spiritual development is bigger than any individual, an obvious truth.
The "EMOs" and the "Eros" people want someone who can make them feel all warm and cuddly. I have my wife and she has me for that.
Even there, though, if I get something wrong, I want her to call me on it. I don't need irrational support. I need to know the truth. Of course, the price you pay for this open-mindedness is that I demand it to a great extent of my wife and friends as well.
With my wife, really, no problem. 23rd anniversary yesterday. :)
at 12:14 on October 15th, 2009
Oh that's it. Obama has surrounded himself with a bunch of yes men to assuage his over-inflated ego/charisma. I think you're projecting qualities the last occupant of the WH had, on to the current resident.
at 11:28 on October 15th, 2009
Vancouver , Washington is not far enough away for the likes of you. Not nearly far away enough, and you have it dead wrong. I bid you adieu.
at 10:39 on October 16th, 2009
Certain media love to Deepthroat Obamalicious stories to their viewers, hence why I watch stations which are not as political, hard to find, but doable.
at 11:13 on October 16th, 2009
Watch your metaphors there, buddy. I think we're being monitored. lol
at 11:14 on October 16th, 2009
double post. deleted