'Canada Free Press' ups ante on Obama birth certificate issue

by Susan Marie Kovalinsky | September 13, 2009 at 05:28 pm
8573 views | 3 Recommendations | 6 comments

Photos

Loading photos...

Just when I thought it was all dying down,  I come upon a post, by Canada Free Press.  And the "certificate of live birth'  of Barack Obama seems set ablaze once more.  What will be the outcome of this matter,  one wonders?  Will it simply,  like some witch's brew,  boil and boil to no avail? 


I find the impetus behind this unsettling.  Somehow ghoulish.  However:  

 A political national committee, the Chair of the Party convention, the Secretary of the Party, Party offices in each of fifty states, and maybe many – many more, have knowingly and wantonly defrauded the American election system and more than 300 million American citizens.

They plotted and planned an act of evil, unlawful, treacherous fraud in a blind quest for unbridled political power, and they hoped that you would never catch it. They almost got away with it too…

They snuck it past fifty state election commissions, congress, the US Supreme Court and Justice Department, the Federal Elections Commission and countless members of the Electoral College nationwide. Not a single member of the, as Limbaugh says, “drive-by media” caught it either, or if they did, they decided to become complicit for their own political reasons.

But as is always the case with liars, cheats and thieves, they slip up – make a silly mistake – overplay their hand – leave evidence lying around that they had forgotten about. And as with all chronic liars, they eventually get caught in their own web of lies.

Then, one day, someone stumbles into that evidence, and the house of cards comes crashing down around them. It’s almost poetic…

The piece reveals 2 documents.  There is a typo which,  it turns out,  appears on both documents,  in the same place,  making it highly suspect.    Apparently,  certain parties,  privy  to the fact that one Barack Hussein Obama was not a natural born citizen,  conspired to omit the entire question from the documents,  thereby allowing them to sign off with clear consciences.  Or so the author of the post asserts.  Both documents may be seen at the source.  The upshot is,  the author of the post believes fully that:

Please, allow me to connect the dots here…
  • The DNC drafted, signed and notarized TWO slightly different versions of their Official Certification of Nomination documents, not one.
  • One of those documents had complete legal language, and one of them was missing the text concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama.
  • The version which is absent any certification of constitutional standing for the office of President is the version that was filed with every state in the country, and the one used by the DNC to elect Barack Obama President. . . .

Now I realize that leftists, I mean liberals, no “progressives” – don’t like getting all bogged down in minutia and nit-picky details like the Constitution, but this is actually very serious business here. We are talking about the top-down leadership of the ruling political Party knowingly and wantonly defrauding voters by way of playing monkey business with fraudulent election documents.

As Al Gore once said, the debate is OVER!

There is no honest debate on the matter anymore. Obama is NOT a constitutional president, which is to say, we do NOT have a constitutional federal administration at present and every anti-American policy of the last six months is also, BINGO! – Unconstitutional!

What is still in question however – does any court in America have the backbone to do what must be done? – And what do the American people do, if not one court in the nation has that kind of constitutional backbone today?

Question:  As one who has broached this subject with others  -  colleagues, family,  friends,  neighbors  -  and always had the subject quickly dropped,  after a few remarks about "right wing insanity"  or "red-neck conspiracy theorists",  I have always assumed this whole issue would fade away.  Thus far,  I have been correct.  I am interested in hearing the opinion of others ( although  a technical glitch on this site makes me unable to respond to any posted remarks.)  

Addendum:


New Hampshire State Representative, Lawrence M. Rappaport payed a visit to Mr. William Gardner, the NH Secretary of State, on Thursday, Sept. 10th.

His stunning request:  an investigation of Barack Hussein Obama’s presence on the NH 2008 Ballot.

Gardner’s stunning response:  an investigation will commence.

I interviewed Mr. Rappaport by email, and asked him, on what basis did he make his complaint; he responded, “The basis for all of this is possible fraud.  I don’t know what penalties will be assessed if fraud is proven.”

Rappaport’s action follows stunning revelations that Nancy Pelosi deliberately signed two different forms certifying Barack Hussein Obama was the Democratic National Party candidate for the presidency.  While these forms have been known to exist for some time, it was J.B. Williams, writing for the Canadian Free Press who brought them national notoriety, earlier this week.

It is unclear, if, in the eventuality that New Hampshire determines fraud was committed, on the grounds that Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States, if the State will move, through its governor, to take some sort of action on the National scene, or who would be liable in law for the crime committed in-state.


Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
4
Cion

DEMOCrat BARACK BARRY HUSSEIN MOHAMED ABDULLAH SOETORO ONYANGO 0BAMA ILLEGAL ALIEN, mombassa kenya   _   Public E-Petition: -   www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81550 www.americasright.com/2008/08/obama-sued-in-philadelphia-federal.html www.naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2133661/posts www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgAtbS861ns&eurl= www.sjcrp.org/?p=558    

2
Captain Steve

Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} There are more logical questions than answers.  First, how did a dual citizen, who is not by definition "naural-born" or eligible to be president get on the ballot? What hospital was he born in?  Who were the witnesses?  Who was the doctor?  Those answers are only on the long-form (the one that is sealed, even though some say nothing is sealed).  Some say it doesn’t exist.  But if it doesn’t exist then what did the people see that makes them sure of his birthplace? Three different COLBs (Certification of Live Birth (short-form)) have been posted online by Factcheck etc.  The first 2 had issues and were replaced.  The current one has issues too (too detailed for here).  Some sites have said they “examined” the document.  Which one, since they are all different?  Why are they all modified?  Why not release it/them to some independent skeptics?  Why not release the long-form? Three different hospitals have some claim to his birth-place, two in Hawaii, One in Kenya. Why spend millions of dollars in attorney fees to prevent all documents from being seen? On top of that, exists the issue of his Kenyan/British father.  The constitutional concept of natural-born citizenship was to prevent dual allegiances.  Why was that never addressed?  They did for McCain (whom I did not support either). To me there are more serious questions than serious answers. . .so I continue the search.  You can too by going to these links.  

2
Brenda D Steed

Dr. Taitz in California has just been granted her complaint against obama's birth certificateby Judge Carter to go forward and a trial date has been set for January 26, 2010.  Go to :www. orlytaitzesq.com and check it out.  It was done today....October 7, 2009.

1
Hugh Askew

freaky, smk.

I clicked on a link to another (current) article - by someone other than you, no less - and ended up here.

Fortunately, i was wearing my tin-foil hat, and no brain cells were damaged ;)

*<[:()


0
Susan Marie Kovalinsky

Oh,  good to know,  now where the heck is it all going to???

1
Steven Wittlake

I am not knocking what you say about Obama regarding his citizenship status under the Constitution of the United States. However, you are ignoring one very important aspect of this whole mess and that is John McCain's part in this mess. You are totally ignoring John McCain's part in this whole mess. He also is not a natural born citizen of the United States. He is a native born citizen of Panama and a automatic naturalized Citizen of the United States which certainly is not a natural born citizen under the Constitution, 14th amendment or every naturalization law passed by Congress since 1795. There was another naturalization Act passed in 1790 which referred to natural born citizens born abroad but this Act was specifically repealed by Congress in the next two subsequent naturalization Acts. John McCain ran for President 3 times saying he was born in Coco Solo but he was born in Colon Panama and his parents were residing in Colon at the time. There exists a birth certificate certified showing that he was born in the Colon Hospital and has been listed on millions of websites. There also exists a Live Birth record from the Panama Canal Health Department showing he was born in Colon and that his parents were residing in Colon at the time and also exists on millions of websites. There also exists a certificate from the Panama Canal Zone Commission issued a year before his retirement also showing he was born in Colon Panama and exists on millions of websites. Most of this information exists as part of a lawsuit in the United States District Court of New Hampshire under case number 1:08-cv-00099 which occured during 2008 election.   The Cities of Colon and Panama City were never part of the Panama Canal Zone grant but they are within the boundaries of the Canal Zone. Additionally the Panama Canal Zone was never ever part of the United States and the United States was never ever soverign in the Panama Canal Zone. The treaty which by the way no Panamanian Government official or Citizen ever signed states that the United States may act as if the were the sovereign in building and protecting the Panama Canal Zone. If you do not believe me look up the Hays- Bauna Varilla Treaty under Sections 2 and 3. It only gives the United States permission to act in certain areas as if they were the Sovereign. When the shooting of at least 22 students trying to put up their flag in the Panama Canal Zone the real facts concerning the Panama Canal Zone came to light around the world and the United States was forced to exit the Panama Canal Zone. The whole treaty was questionable and not legal in any International Court because no Panama Government or citizen ever signed the Treaty. Bauna Varilla was a Frenchman who had a finacial interest in the Canal being built and he signed the treaty before any Panamaian official could sghow up for any negotiations. Another subject you might look up is the Olson-Tribe letter writting supposedly by lawyers for both McCain and Obama and trying to justify both their qualification to run for President. Not one argument is based upon the Constitution . If you would like me to give documentation of everything give me an email address I can attach documents. By the way it was me that put all this information on 2 websites which generated into at least 4 million websites. However, I think Obama supportors were the people who spread it over the internet to degrade John McCain.    

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from