Chinese warning for Nobel peace prize

by Amitjha | October 8, 2008 at 12:27 am
287 views | 31 Recommendations | 11 comments

Photos

Chinese warning for Nobel peace prize

Chinese warning for Nobel peace prize

see larger image

uploaded by Amitjha

Chinese foreign minister categorically said that nobel prizes are not given based on potentials but on politics, he cited the example of Dalai lama for this reason.This seems to be quite frustrating for the communist government to accept the reality of world view regarding china.The Nobel nomination of Chinese is hurting China most, because it is going to expose the atrocities of chinese authority.

The Chinese foreign ministry said some past choices had gone against the prize's original purpose of promoting world peace and human progress.

The award went to the Dalai Lama 19 years ago, and dissidents Hu Jia and Gao Zhisheng are on this year's list.

This year marks the 60th anniversary of the signing of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human rights.

Stein Toennesson, who leads the Peace Research Institute in Oslo, says a Chinese dissident is hotly tipped to win.

"The Olympic Games did not bring the improvement many had hoped for, but instead led to a number of strict security measures," Mr Toennesson told AP news agency.

Of the nearly 200 nominees for the Peace Prize, Hu Jia is seen as the most likely contender.

A democracy and Aids activist, Mr Hu is the best-known of China's imprisoned dissidents.

He is credited with chronicling instances of abuse and alerting both fellow Chinese human rights activists and foreign news organisations.

He was convicted last April of inciting subversion, and is now serving a three-and-a-half-year jail sentence.

His wife has been placed under house arrest.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
anamika.mis15
anamika.mis15
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 00:34 on October 8th, 2008

Amitjha, I like this story. It's good stuff.

duo
duo
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 02:08 on October 8th, 2008

Amitjha, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Thank you, Amitjha.  I just had to stop by here after reading your headline!  Anytime one reads "Chinese warning" and "peace" in the same title, it just makes you want to stop and read.  The referral to "past" choices is interesting, also.  Does that mean something is over?

Mary

0
Amitjha

Thanks duo, 

 first off all for your such alovely comment, secondly for your GS flag.I do have serious doubt regarding the winning of nobel by a chinese, what if chinese sports ministry get it for olympic.well nobel always gets some rebuff particularly in peace and litrature segment.The othre side of it is that , it is not totally unbiased.

nagba
nagba
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 02:36 on October 8th, 2008

Hah! The chinese might be right... after all they are doing the very same all the time so they should know how it looks like. :P

0
Amitjha

well every opinion must have some percentage of truth, in chinese case we cant deny that.we have evidences from past where most deserving cadidates didnt get the recognition, Gandhi is best example of that.

francisrivera
francisrivera
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 03:28 on October 8th, 2008

Amitjha, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Paschen
Paschen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 03:35 on October 8th, 2008

Amitjha, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Barry Artiste
Barry Artiste
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 03:42 on October 8th, 2008

Amitjha, I like this story. It's good stuff. Hell,  Al Gore is one case of Nobel Hypocrisy!

Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 04:24 on October 8th, 2008

Amitjha, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
AlvarezGalloso

This is not to defend anyone involved in the China VS Nobel Peace Prize Issue.

You have a great article. I would like to add something. I never paid attention to the Nobel Peace Prize since there are people who have been nominated but never deserved. There was even one time during the 1930's and 1940's that Hitler, Stalin, and Gandhi were nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize with Gandhi being rejected in favour of Hitler and Stalin.

Jorge Luis Borges [Argentinian Writer] was once rejected for a Nobel Prize in Literature because of his support for the Military Government in Argentina. He supported the Military Government since he was against Peronism. Regardless, he has written great books. I have my references in these articles.

http://www.helium.com/items/643052-al-gore-awarded-nobel-peace-prize

 

“Gore Awarded Nobel Peace Prize” Alvarez-Galloso, Roberto; Helium Date Unknown

 

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-op-tookienobel4dec04,1,1344488.story

 

“Who Doesn’t Have A Nobel Prize Nomination?” Volokh, Eugene

LA Times December 4, 2005

 

 

0
a m


Even basic human rights should be seen in context.


The Chinese though totalitarian are not as bad as other Dictatorships.

The degree of corruption of their programs is very small. Corruption

is limited to individuals and does not make their development programs

ineffective.

As compared to that India's democracy is a pure sham and

effectively all power remains in the hands of those classes that always

had power. It makes it possible for Upper Class Indians to feel quite safe while

we permanently maintain about half a billion individuals in conditions of

abject poverty, illiteracy, and hopelessness, far worse off than the black

slaves of USA before the Civil War. Development programs have been

rendered largely ineffective because our corruption is a sort of

Class Corruption, the central purpose of which appears to be to deny

intended beneficiaries the benefits of equity and development. Chinese have

almost completely reformed their society long back and removed all old

social evils, while we in India have decided not to disturb the

status quo ante as far as our primitive social structure is concerned.

I think the Chinese can be excused their human rights violations. For a

traditionally poor and backward country it needs several generations of

hard regimented disciplined development work before they can afford the

luxury of leaving every citizen free to do their own thing. Now that they

are economically much stronger than before we can already see that they

are opening up the economy to outside influence. In time the continuous

exposure to outsiders not accompanied by feelings of inferiority (unlike

India) will make them accept social change and bring about a kind of

liberalization.

I feel that a strong China is better than a "free" or "liberal" but weak China.




This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from