Confessions of a Conspiracy Theorist

Photos

E. Howard Hunt

see larger image

uploaded by SUICIDEkings

• 

  uploaded by SUICIDEkings | add comment

• 

  uploaded by SUICIDEkings | add comment

• 

  uploaded by SUICIDEkings | add comment

• 

  uploaded by SUICIDEkings | add comment

• 

  uploaded by SUICIDEkings | add comment

by Sheila Casey / October 24th, 2008

Over the past few decades, the CIA controlled mainstream media in America has achieved a significant PR objective: they have made it socially unacceptable to believe that there is a conspiracy operating at the highest levels of our government. This puts those of us who do know about the plot at high levels in an awkward position: either we pretend that we don’t know what we know, or we risk being ridiculed and marginalized as a pathetic joke.

He who defines the language defines the parameters of the debate, and so far the conspirators are winning. They have succeeded in imbuing the moniker “conspiracy theorist” with such intensely negative connotations that even most conspiracy theorists—such as 9/11 truth activists—tie themselves in knots to avoid earning that label.

Is there anything wrong with having theories? Of course not. Knowledge progresses through scientists proposing a certain hypothesis (or theory) and then testing to see if it holds up. It doesn’t mean they are flying blind, untethered by facts. They use the facts they already know to create theories about things that are still unknown. Article continues at 

The Progressive Mind-II