The Dark Knight...Good But Not Great!

by badmovieguy | July 22, 2008 at 12:41 am
765 views | 0 Recommendations | 5 comments

Photos

The Dark Knight...Good But Not Great!

The Dark Knight...Good But Not Great!

see larger image

uploaded by badmovieguy

As a long time Batman fan, I was predisposed to liking the new movie The Dark Knight, so why isn't my favorite movie of all time?  Let me tell you.

I'm a big fan of Christopher Nolan's style for this movie, (after all, isn't Batman supposed to be a dark forboding character?) but style isn't everything.  The Dark Knight opens (more or less) where Batman Begins left off, Batman in fighting the mob and corruption in Gotham City, and, while the public at large seems to embrace him, the police are still ambivalent toward him.  A new D.A., Harvery Dent (played wonderfully by Aaron Eckhart) has stepped into the city's spotlight as the new 'white knight' of the city, although he's making powerful enemies within the gangs.  As Batman struggles with the idea that he may no longer be needed in Gotham, a new villian appears to aid the mob in killing him...that's the Joker!

Now, I've read all the reviews and seen all the reports, but after seeing the movie for myself, I have to say, that this is a good comic book movie, not a great comic book movie.  Christian Bale's Bruce Wayne is pretty good, but his Batman is a bit too forced for my liking.  The voice that he affects while in the cape and cowl sounds too much like someone pretending to be Satanically possessed and not all that scary.  And, while Heath Ledger's Joker is mean, crazy and psychotic, is it really an Oscar worthy performance?  I really don't think so!  After all, this Joker isn't really the Joker that all of us fans have known and loved for decades, this Joker has no real backstory, and what we do find out about him makes him more of a normal maniac and less like the Joker.  It's almost like the filmmakers decided that one strange origin story was all that the audience would buy into, well, if I'm willing to set aside disbelief about a man in a bat suit jumping for highrise buildings, I think I can stay with you if the Joker's a criminal who's fallen into chemical that turned his skin white, his hair green, paralyzed the muscles in his face into a perpetual smile and warped his mind...after all, that's the Joker, this is some psycho in clown makeup.

I'm sure, at this point, you're saying that I'm a nitpicking fanboy, and that's probably true on some level, but I still think that The Dark Knight could have been a truely great movie.  It was about 45 minutes too long, the mafia money laundering angle, and the entire sequence that takes place in Hong Kong could probably have been eliminated.  The entire Harvey Dent/Two Face storyline felt wasted here,  Aaron Eckhart really carries this movie, the 'white knight' Dent fighting against the odds, and then losing both his love, his looks and his mind is the best character arc in the movie, and the makeup effects made Two Face come to life for the first time (Apologies to Tommy Lee Jones).

Clocking in at two and half hours, The Dark Knight is too long, the tone of the movie is great, but the story felt a bit stilted and forced in places ("Hey guys, if we go to Hong Kong, we can drop Batman from a tall building and it'll look really cool!"  "How does that add to the story?"  "Who cares!  It'll look really cool!"), and while Ledger is good as the Joker, Oscar worthy?  Probably not.  Again, this is a good comic book movie, not a great comic book movie, if you want a great comic book movie, head to the next theatre and check out Iron Man.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Alastair

I'd have to agree with everything you say here, except the "iron man is a great movie" part. I preferred Dark Knight to Ironman, but contrary to about every other commentator on imdb, I think Batman Begins is better than the Dark Knight.


I'd just like to add one extra comment to the above article, and that is unfortunately, the Dark Knight isn't believeable. To me, a believable film gives it great depth. Batman Begins was both fantastic and believeable which is a first. The Dark Knight had a "Die-hard" over the topness about it which I didn't like. The Joker comes from nowhere with zero resources and yet holds at least a city if not a country to ransom. Where does the joker get his supplies from? how did he manage to plant 100 plus explosives in the boat or hospital without being noticed? He says he doesn't plan, but he couldn't have carried out anything without it.

Batman Begins' bad guy was believeable because he was part of the New World Order that owned and controlled everything of which Batman was a part of. The perfect renegade. The perfect good/bad guy division. I didn't really see it in the Dark Knight.



0
Digital Sin

I TOTALLY agree, specially about Christian Bale's Batman's voice! It literally tore me away from the experience everytime I heared him speak. Why can't he just talk normally! Half the movie already knew who he actually was anyways.

Other than that, Great movie. But certainly not better than The Lord of the Rings or The Godfather as IMDB would lead you to belive right now.

0
Rach

wow. when i read this i thought no way! i mean i totally do not agree with any of this. okay, one thing. that it was too long.

but other than that no, i loved this movie. its my favorite! and  i don't agree with pretty much any of it. i saw this movie 4 times in theaters. yes, thats a lot of money, but it was worth it. heath ledger is extremely amazing in this film,and its terrible that he can't make more. cause he's dead, but this was his best movie ever. and he certaintly should get a Oscar for this movie. GO HEATH!

i know a good movie when i see one. and this is most deffinatly one!!!

and i  really dont agree with  the iron man part.

but everyone has their own opinions.

0
Slayer

From my point of view dark knight might be a good movie but not the original action movie appeal is missing here, seems like a spread option for this movie is lying over here and there of the plot but there was no fixed theme that could indicate it's original views.

0
Calamari

I honestly thought the movie should have been longer...but I guess I'm one of the few heh.

As for Joker not having a back story or any resources, I actually enjoyed the fact that Nolan decide to do this with his Joker. I believe that the random acts of violence and ransom holding were all meant to dehumanize Joker to the extent that he doesn't even seem like flesh and blood, but more like "an unstoppable force," in his own words.

I thought that the lack of a back story only serves to emphasize his chaotic presense in the movie, as well as allow the audience to find amusement in his two completely different versions of his own origin.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from