Truemors
is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
Declaring War: Citizen Journalists thrown under the bus
Share:
by smkovalinsky | September 29, 2009 at 10:40 pm
103 views | 20 Recommendations | 1 comment
Photos
Citizen Journalists thrown under the bus : War on unpaid CJs
uploaded by smkovalinsky
Declaring War on Unpaid Journalists
"This is about ensuring that there is a wall between real journalists and the perceived unwashed masses of ignorant, unqualified bloggers who are mucking up the system. This is a serious issue, because I believe that reliable citizen journalists do have the respect of traditional media in some circles, but this legislative bid to create a firm wall is declaring war on us." ~Pam Spaulding, Sep. 29, 2009
This story is so important I highlight a bit more text than usual, so all can get the concepts: I came upon this article when researching some gay blogs. I am sorry there is a bit of a problem with the text formatting; it would not highlight well as it was oddly formatted; but it is fully sourced ( all one blog post): There does need to be an outcry over this, it really effects all citizen journalists as a monolithic group:
At the Blend we have inboxes overflowing with emails asking us to cover this story or that event -- from advocacy organizations, tips from readers, PR firms, and the news media. It's pretty clear that the equality rights movement is highly dependent on blogs and citizen journalism to analyze, report and advocate in the unique way that we do.Many of these LGBT-based blogs are done as a labor of love because there's certainly not enough money out there to quit our day jobs. Bloggers like myself, who subsidize the site with an unrelated day job are about to geta big F-You from Chuck Schumer if the roof isn't raised. Ad revenue is irrelevant here, btw; you have to be employed by an entity to be covered.
The law, called the Free Flow of Information Act, is intended to prevent journalists from being forced to divulge confidential sources, except in cases such as witnessing crimes or acts of terrorism. Well, read the fine print to see how citizen journalists are left legally hanging out to dry. Schumer's amendment draws a distinct line between bloggers and "real journalists" that: mits the definition of a journalist to one who "obtains the information sought while working as a salaried employee of, or independent contractor for, an entity- a. that disseminates information by print, broadcast, cable, satellite, mechanical, photographic, electronic, or other means; and b. that--
recent amendment to the federal shield bill being considered in the Senate will exclude non-"salaried" journalists and bloggers from the proposed law's protections.
1. publishes a newspaper, book, magazine, or other periodical;
2. operates a radio or television broadcast station, network, cable system, or satellite carrier, or a channel or programming service for any such station, network, system, or carrier;
3. operates a programming service; or
4. operates a news agency or wire service."
"So there's no doubt that independent bloggers are the target here. At once we're considered irrelevant and so dangerous they have to legislatively set up a slippery slope that can land us in the clink or left penniless just for trying to participate in citizen journalism. Wow. The real issue here, however, is less the shield law than placing a definition of what is a journalist on the books. That will alllow pols, news outlets, state governments, etc. to deny citizen journalists press access because they are not "journalists" as defined by federal law.
It's a huge slippery slope and a loss for independent reporting by bloggers if this definition clears.
Marcy Wheeler of Firedoglake confirms that we're screwed:
To to be a journalist in Chuck Schumer's eyes, you have to both have a boss (at this point, you generous readers and Jane would count as my boss, but Jane doesn't have a boss, for example) and that boss' company must disseminate news on some other medium, in addition to the Toobz. Even free-lance writers or people like IF Stone (in the period when he ran his own newsletter) would be excluded from this definition of journalist.
Now, I'm on the record as a skeptic that this new law is going to work out the way the media thinks. I fear that the national security exemption will mean the law will protect people like Judy Miller mobilizing smears or the Rent-a-Generals spreading propaganda, but not protect Dana Priest or James Risen and their sources.Still, this move pisses me off because it's a transparent bid to grant a powerful industry special privileges.
This is about ensuring that there is a wall between real journalists and the perceived unwashed masses of ignorant, unqualified bloggers who are mucking up the system. This is a serious issue, because I believe that reliable citizen journalists do have the respect of traditional media in some circles, but this legislative bid to create a firm wall is declaring war on us." http://www.bilerico.com/2009/09/hanging_citizen_journalists_out_to_dry_shield-law.php
What is NowPublic?
NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.
Crowd Power
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (1)
at 06:39 on September 30th, 2009
Why am I not surprised?