NP Rank:
Dr. Samuel Becker on the State of Journalism
IOWA CITY - Dr. Samuel Becker's ten monographs and 115 journal and book publications defined 20th century speech communication studies according to the University of Iowa. His service to the field spans over a half century, giving him unique perspective on the future of journalism in America. Thursday in Iowa City, Becker discussed current trends threatening the very core of the journalism industry.
With government media deregulation came the subsequent rise of massive media corporations and mergers. The locally owned news outlet is becoming a thing of the past according to Becker. Local news outlets operating in the local public interest are increasingly being swallowed by global corporations with global stock holders. These co-opted news outlets lose their focus on local public interest just as they lose their local ownership, Becker argued. "Corporations some distance away no longer care about [public interest]," Becker said. "They care about maximizing profit."
This profit-centric mentality in the wake of deregulation has other consequences, Becker noted. Despite a focus on sales over the public interest, decline in profit leads to the firing of the already constrained newsroom staff while sales staff go unscathed.
This "constrained" newsroom staff results from the rise of hired research firms tasked with tapping into public opinion. These surveys and studies on how to make a news outlet more attractive to the public have been a major corporate focus. "It isn't news judgment, but a judgment of what is going to be profitable," Becker said.
Media outlets are increasingly pressured to write stories that draw in the most ad revenue rather than stories that serve and inform the public. Autonomy and news judgment erodes, and the public suffers as a result. "Networks and papers aren't focusing enough on what people ought to know," Becker said. "That's part of the business, part of the responsibility of people in the news business." According to Becker, it takes incredibly "chutspah" for a journalist to step up and put first what's in the public interest rather than what will sell in light of this profit-centric pressure.
Becker centered on a recent study showing the comedy news program The Daily Show on the Comedy Central Network has an equal amount of hard news as ABC, NBC, or CBS news broadcasts. "This is a sad commentary on our network news shows who've become influenced too much by what will attract viewers to their ads versus what the viewers should be informed about," Becker said.
When asked how journalists might reverse these trends, Becker had some advice. "I think a really good journalist can attract audiences who want to know what's going on in the world," Becker said. "Very often they're asking the wrong questions." Becker the debate surrounding whether or not the United States is dipping into a recession as an example. "It's a stupid question," Becker began. "What's the difference? A lot of people are out of work and out of homes. We've got to do something about this."
Becker's argument reflects that of journalism scholars Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel. These scholars criticize the "argument culture" plaguing American journalism, wherein two parties are often invited to argue about an issue rather than working toward actual solutions.
"You won't always be popular with officials and corporate owners, but it's terribly important," Becker concluded. "This will build back trust in the news media, which is something we need to do."
Crowd Power
-
Drew Bulman
Iowa City, Iowa, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 12:04 on April 11th, 2008
Drew Bulman, thanks for this great article.
In response to Dr. Becker's statement, "Media outlets are increasingly pressured to write stories that will draw in the most ad revenue rather than writing stories to serve and inform the public. Autonomy and news judgment is eroded, and the public suffers as a result. " --- this is one of the reasons news communities like NowPublic are needed.
One of the best ways for the public to be 'served and informed', is to enable the public to participate in creating, sharing, and discussing news.
at 12:33 on April 11th, 2008
There is a massive difference between the mainstream media, and journalists centered in journalism academia. Journalism scholars are fascinated by these community sites. They see them as an opportunity, and they all are amazingly aware with the problems facing journalism today. They see truth and serving the public as top priorities, and understand how forces are diminishing these priorities.
Unfortunately, we have a majority of the mainstream media on the other side. Principles are not so high on the totem pole, and these trends and pressures are hardly even noticed, while community media is seen more of as a threat, or a burden they have to accommodate.
I would recommend Kovach and Rosenstiel's book "The Elements of Journalism." It really did change my entire perception about the industry, and I've loaned it out to numerous people. It deals almost entirely with topics touched on in my Becker interview, but more importantly, it goes into great depth on how to solve these issues.
at 12:15 on April 13th, 2008
Hey Drew, I think "The Elements of Journalism" is required readings for most j-schools (it certainly is at my school). Thanks for the post, hmmm...I think this post though might fit better in the culture channel though. Here's the link to our channel descriptions.
at 12:20 on April 13th, 2008
Thanks Cynthia. The Elements of Journalism was sort of my cornerstone as a journalist. I read it and things just sort of clicked, and I've been living by it ever since. Hell, under religious views in my facebook* profile I have "Edward Murrow" written down, haha.
*Which I check very very rarely, mind you.
at 12:28 on April 13th, 2008
Drew Bulman, I like this story. It's good stuff.