NP Rank:
Gay activist Andrew Sullivan rankles federal judge
I have been reading Andrew Sullivan's gay activism treatises and philosophical and political essays and books for over a decade now. My husband and I used to summer in Provincetown, on Cape Cod, and were thrilled to get a glimpse of the British-born and raised author - who emmigrated from the UK to the US in the 1980s - going about town. This story raises a few questions: particularly, of equal protection:
Political commentator, author and writer for The Atlantic magazine Andrew M. Sullivan won’t have to face charges stemming from a recent pot bust at the Cape Cod National Seashore — but a federal judge isn't happy about it.
U. S. Magistrate Judge Robert B. Collings says in his decision that the case is an example of how sometimes "small cases raise issues of fundamental importance in our system of justice."
While marijuana possession may have been decriminalized, Sullivan, who owns a home in Provincetown, made the mistake of being caught by a park ranger with a controlled substance on National Park Service lands, a federal misdemeanor.
The ranger issued Sullivan a citation, which required him either to appear in U.S. District Court or, in essence, pay a $125 fine.
But the U.S. Attorney’s Office sought to dismiss the case. Both the federal prosecutor and Sullivan’s attorney said it would have resulted in an "adverse effect" on an unspecified "immigration status" that Sullivan, a British citizen, is applying for.
During the hearing Collings was perplexed as to why the case should be dropped, and stated that admission of the crime on Sullivan's application would be necessary regardless. Moreover , Collings also:
. . . expressed his concern that "a dismissal would result in persons in similar situations being treated unequally before the law. … persons charged with the same offense on the Cape Cod National Seashore were routinely given violation notices, and if they did not agree to [pay the fine] were prosecuted by the United States Attorney … there was no apparent reason for treating Mr. Sullivan differently from other persons charged with the same offense." . . .
Crowd Power
-
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States
Recommendations (26)
-
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
caj1
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Tina Kells
Vancouver, Canada -
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (1)
at 15:36 on September 11th, 2009
Thanks for this, smkovalinsky! I agree with the judge that "there was no apparent reason for treating Mr. Sullivan differently from other persons charged with the same offense." . . ."
Equal treatment before the law is crucial to a sound justice system. One of which is lacking and for the very reason that people are very often treated unequally before the law. So, BRAVO to Judge Collings for stating his position!:)
BTW, would you mind adding the tag "sexuality" here so this story will also appear on NowPublic Sexuality Special News Coverage channel. Thanks.