NP Rank:
Gay Marriage in Maine: Ad campaign to be aired state-wide
In response to a state referendum to block the legislation of gay marriage, an ad campaign will begin airing in Maine. Proponents of gay marriage in the state say the the ad is not run by their own campaign , but by allies promoting marriage equality. The ad, entitled Together , is an attempt to evoke core Maine values protecting gays. It is hoped that through a pictoral account, those on the fence regarding the state's gay marriage legislation will be given food for thought. GLAAD will release statements with more information and details soon, according to AMERICAblog Gay.
In recent news, a coalition representing African Americans defending the traditional definition of marriage has warned President Obama that he may lose their support if he goes in the direction of defending gay marriage nationally. Numerous gay advocates have become perplexed and irate at the Presiden't apparent waffling of "flip flopping" on gay issues since the campaign trail days. At a recent Fire Island gay fundraiser, there was silence instead of applause when the President was mentioned, indicative of the bewilderment and confusion on both sides of the issue.
Crowd Power
-
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States
Recommendations (51)
-
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
charliemcmillan
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom -
mudricky
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States 
Anonymous user
-
Tina Kells
Vancouver, Canada -
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Beaulieu
London, United Kingdom -
Criticom
Chicago, Illinois, United States







Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (187)
at 08:08 on August 20th, 2009
Thanks for this story, smkovalinsky!
at 08:10 on August 20th, 2009
You are quite welcome, and thank you! :)
at 08:16 on August 20th, 2009
You are very welcome, smkovalinsky! Would you mind adding the tag 'sexuality' so this story will also appear on NowPublic Sexuality Special News Coverage channel. Thanks!
at 08:39 on August 20th, 2009
Yes, will ad that tag, and the story link now, thanks!
at 08:39 on August 20th, 2009
Again, you are very welcome:)!
at 12:54 on August 20th, 2009
Its people like you who should be "locked away for good." Because then there will be peace in this world.
at 14:49 on August 20th, 2009
Considering I am a girl who likes guys I don't think I have a problem with straight people. I believe in egalitariansim.
at 01:17 on September 7th, 2009
You must see first a psychiatric and then try to turn hetero.jerk!
at 10:20 on August 20th, 2009
Is the point of view here that the Obama Administration is changing its view? I thought during the presidential campaigns he favored "civil union" but reserved "marriage" to be only between a man and woman. I have not read where his position on this has changed.
Few politicians have supported gay marriage, except for Gavin Newson mayor of San Francisco. It is difficult for politicians to publically come out in favor of gay marriage and remain philosophically a centrist and not alienate the religious community. There were divides on this even within my own family, and I do not discuss it. My views are liberal, but my views are not shared among all my family. I more or less take a centrist position just to keep the peace, and perhaps this is what people running for office have to do also.
at 10:20 on August 20th, 2009
Leezer: Well, I guess that is a satirical comment. There is a real divide in some parts of the world, as in Norway, in which Muslim areas want no part of gay culture, which is understandable given their adherence to ancient tradition. In a free democracy and pluralitst society it is decidedly different.
at 10:22 on August 20th, 2009
You are right, Obama always adhered to civil unions. They did not take him at his word, and are stunned that he did not change once elected. Hence, he only appears to have flip-flopped. But this is the way the gay community experiences this, or at least some of the activists who voted for Obama.
at 10:36 on August 20th, 2009
Speak for yourself - we most certainly CANNOT all agree on that. I think people should be able to marry whoever they want, and narrow minded thinking is only going to perpetuate more hatred and pain for everyone.
at 12:54 on August 20th, 2009
Stop talking for everyone else you dipshit.
at 10:37 on August 20th, 2009
Well, it does not disgust everyone, but in fairness to you, there are serious and weighty social arguments against it, both from the religious domain, and the secular.
at 10:38 on August 20th, 2009
I would agree with amyjudd, however, that in a free and democratic society, and one which claims to pluralism and multiculturalism, tolerence and openess is a must.
at 10:47 on August 20th, 2009
smkovalinsky I admire your reserve and magnanimity.
What is really disgusting is people who try and control the lives of others and project their prejudicial, bigoted views onto others. Leezer, your use of the inclusive "we" is presumptious and offensive to those in this conversation and the gay community.
at 10:51 on August 20th, 2009
Well said
at 12:57 on August 20th, 2009
You do not give them acceptance because you deny them social liberty and equity. This great country was founded by settlers who came here to escape persecution. Don't impose your's on this great nation four hundred years later.
at 11:29 on September 2nd, 2009
"How much more do they want?"
They used to say this about black people.
"They demand acceptance so we give it to them."
Separate but equal does not constitute acceptance.
"America giving them acceptance is bad enough but letting them getting married is taking it too far."
How would you feel if gays decided that they should decide whether heterosexuals should be allowed to get married or not? You decide that your group is in a strong position, so you decide what rights a group you don't like should have because you think you are stronger.
"I guess the next step is letting one of them become President."
They used to say this about black people too, and women. Anyway, how do you know one of them hasn't been, already. If they are all forced to lie about what they are, how will you know?
"What has this once great country come to?"
I think it's called democracy. It started out with black men, then included women, now gays. Who knows where it will end. Your rights only end when you interfere with those of others. This group of black Christians will have to learn, or Obama will have to learn to get along without them, as he did with Rev. Wright. I thought Rev. Wright was okay until he started denouncing Jews.
Christopher
Christopher Hobe Morrison
at 09:52 on September 6th, 2009
Very good rebutal.
at 11:01 on August 20th, 2009
Well, leezer, your view is shared by some on the right, some religious communities, and especially, Islaam. This is why I could never understand the conservative hatred of Islaam, which voices so much of what it cannot. But in a progressive democracy, where, exactly, is the disgust coming from? It is not a natural disgust, or all would have it. It is not the disgust one feels for rotting corpses, and universally repugnant things. So I am assuming it is ideology, religious or conservative. Run these thoughts by Rush Limbaugh; see what he says.....Yes, a211..., I try to remain calm.......try......:(
at 13:01 on August 20th, 2009
No more patience. Get off the site you bigoted prick. Youv said your peace now go. Your bullshit is not welcome here or anywhere else in the land of the free. See the other problem with all of the religious arguments is you pple take everything out of context. You spout off advice from Paul's letters written for a specific group of people for a specific reason. If homosexuality was so offensive to God why does Jesus not address it even once. What he did say was love your neighbor as yourself. Any right that you think you deserve entitlement to so does everyonme else.
at 11:38 on September 2nd, 2009
"To all gays in the U.S.; Barack Obama said this nation needs to change and maybe you gays should too!"
It must be nice if the only people who need to change are those people you don't like, and they need to change to be more like you. And of course any time you say something that people don't like they are ganging up on you.
I suppose it's good you voiced your opinion, it's better than all the people who hate gays and don't say anything, then go to vote for something like Proposition 8.
"If the gays gain too much power"? How much is that? To live normal lives? That would be just fine. To interfere with the lives of heterosexuals such as me? That would be too much, but I'm not scared. As with blacks, just being out in the open with people having to look at them is too much for some people. Now that they are out in the open, why not start to talk to them instead of about them for a change? Ask them about their lives and what they want. If you aren't insulting they just might tell you at least if they think you will listen.
Christopher
at 11:14 on August 20th, 2009
"They demand acceptance..."
leezer
You are correct like the oppressed that have gone before them who have been marginalized because of race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, and age.
at 13:02 on August 20th, 2009
Stop talking as an American authority. Your narrowminded views do not represent one bit of what America stands for.
at 12:20 on August 20th, 2009
*Heavy sigh.* :(
at 12:39 on August 20th, 2009
"Some historians have speculated that King may have been homosexual, and that he had a long-term intimate relationship with President-to-be James Buchanan (it is not disputed that the two lived together for 16 years in Washington). It is also said that King's detractors in the Senate referred to him as "Aunt fancy" and "Miss Nancy" (both language referring to homosexual men in the nineteenth century). The theory is controversial and a source of debate among Buchanan and King historians. Historian and author James Loewen is one of the theory's better-known proponents. Presidential historian Michael Beschloss when asked by C-SPAN founder and host Brian Lamm if the United States had ever had a gay president responded that the term "gay" was a twentieth century construct. Undeterred, Lamm rephrased his question, asking if the nation had had a homosexual president. Beschloss replied that it appears Buchanan and King may have been homosexual."
Link
at 12:42 on August 20th, 2009
Fascinating and relevant, and yes, the term is indeed a construct of postmodernism. Thanks.
at 13:03 on August 20th, 2009
They should not have to. We live in a world that is free. No one has to explain their actions as long as they do not commit a crime. Even then they have the right to remain silent. They should not have to explain themselves to you especially.
at 12:54 on August 20th, 2009
Well, obviously leezer, they are not going to take too kindly to your desire to get rid of them all, now are they?