Grammar makes a comeback!

by Rob Peters | December 7, 2007 at 12:10 am
1358 views | 2 Recommendations | 25 comments

Videos

The Skeletor Show Episode 4 - Grammar

see larger video

sourced by Jordan Yerman

The Skeletor Show Episode 4 - Grammar

A superb column from a formidable literary talent.

It would appear the exclamation mark is making a comeback.

Think back to the lawless wild west of the early Internet, and you might recall stodgy grammarians getting their wool scarves in a knot over the state of English grammar.

Online sentences in those grammatically unruly turn-of-the-century years rarely started with a capital letter, nor did they finish with a period.

Worst of all, they weren't gracefully ushered along by our ever-faithful friend, the comma.
 
A typical e-mail, circa 1999, might have gone as follows:
 
oh hi bill wanna have lunch at 2? meet me at white spot cool?
 
But writers weren't going to give up their literary standards without a fight. Authors such as Lynne Truss penned books such as Eats, Shoots and Leaves, a grammar guide bemoaning the desperate state of things and warning of the grammatical apocalypse to come.
 
The problem surely resonated, for her book became a best-seller.
 
So, did anyone listen? Fast forward to Web 2.0, and we're facing a different situation. Or, I should say, we're facing a different situation!
 
We're more sophisticated web users now, and we've come to realize a major weakness in online correspondence. That is, it's extremely easy to have complete tonal breakdowns in text.
 
Your well-meaning "Hello R. Peters" in an e-mail could very well have me scratching my head, wondering why all the formality? I could have sworn we were better friends.
 
In fact, my girlfriend and I have had countless fights based on instant messaging tonal ambiguities -- why did you only lol, surely that joke warranted a LOL -- most of them resolved within five minutes of being in each other's presence.
 
So if communication really is 90 per cent non-verbal, is online correspondence destined for failure?
 
Maybe not. Enter the exclamation mark -- with an arrogant swagger.
 
Over the past few years I've worked in jobs requiring a ton of e-mailing, and I've definitely noticed a trend: grammar is in again.
 
I think I know why. Perhaps as a way of offsetting all this tonal ambiguity, we've swung the pendulum in the other direction.
 
Rather than under-punctuate and offend, we've opted to over-punctuate and befriend.
 
So instead of:
 
oh hi bill wanna have lunch at 2? meet me at white spot cool?
 
We now have:
 
Hi Bill! Want to have lunch at two? Meet me at Slickity Jim's. Regards!
 
How can anyone mistake the sheer enthusiasm of the latter message for anything but love?
 
This is the power of the exclamation mark. This is the power, my friends, of grammar.
 
I once worked for an editor who would swear loudly every time he received an e-mail with an exclamation mark. His prerogative was that a good writer doesn't need cheap gimmicks to make the intention of his or her words clear. The sentence should stand on its own.
 
This, I feel, is dangerous thinking, and not only that, it's not very fun thinking.
 
Incidentally, that editor is now unemployed as far as I know.
 
Clearly, language is changing as it adapts to usage within the technological behemoth of the Internet.
 
If a few extra punctuation marks here and there help to ease the growing pains for everyone, shouldn't we oblige?
 
Shouldn't we?!?

 

Rob Peters, Richmond News

Published: Friday, December 07, 2007





 

 

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
Martha Jones

Nice article, Rob Peters! Personally I think grammar is a good thing. It helps avoid misunderstandings.

0
fizzbang

Not just wrong, but inconsistently wrong. That's the worst kind of wrongness!

0
carofins

Interesting article. I'm always blown away by how many professional Power Point presentations have apostrophes with plurals, or how English professors will use the wrong version of 'your' in a handout. 

0
xadrian

Written language is nothing more
than adapted and accepted visual representations of concepts.  There's a reason for punctuation just as
there's a reason for an A or Z.  It CAN be overused, but the wonderful
thing about an exclamation is that it can't be incorrectly used.  Think
about it!  The only alternative I can see is saying, THINK ABOUT IT, 
but isn't there a taboo against caps?  There should be more punctuations
that add body language and inflection into text.  Think of all the
annoying miscommunications you could avoid if you had a punctuation that conveyed more complexity; a sarcastic exclamation, a demur acceptance, a
rhetorical question.

It's easy in literature to write it.  "I'm ever so pleased to make
your acquaintance," Sir Reggie said balefully.   But how do I do
that in an email or IM?  There's no baleful exclamation point.  How do I get across with just words that I’m
being evil or I plan on being evil?  How
else do I send complex emotions via mere text without at least using punctuation?

"Hey, new online friend.  It's good to finally talk to you.  Just so you know, that last sentance was said with malicious intent. "

Sorry, not a treatise.  Carry on.

0
baconista

Glad this was useful to you. As many grammarians must, I cringe whenever I see the New York Times' constant misuse of apostrophes. I realize that this is consistent with their house style, which is itself otherwise quite consistent with the accepted rules of the English language. Apparently, a mistake was made sometime in the 1920s and no art director has had the balls to fix it yet.

0
berrygirl

I've been to San Francisco a couple of times, either to visit my brother, attend a conference, or both, and I really enjoy visiting Chinatown. As an English teacher, I have a rather heightened awareness of spelling, and when I caught this, I quickly decided I needed to remember this example of translating-gone-awry (or of sign-spacing-gone-awry).

0
Kurt Wagner

Taken at a small circus in N. NJ this summer, the seemingly random use of apostrophes really stood out.

0
tales of a concrete desert

As an Austrian student of English Language and Literature, I'm of course confronted with learning grammar. It's not always easy, because mainly I just talk and write, and my gut feeling tells me when a phrase sounds wrong. Having to apply certain grammatical rules all of a sudden is therefore a bit confusing, at time. I try my best, though, because using grammar in a correct way makes texts much more easily readable.

Especially online people need to focus on that again, I think. It should be a given to speak and write correctly, at least in certain situations.

0
barnonwheels

I was really amused by the misspelling of "pumpkins", as well as the unintentional command: "U Pick Punpkins Tonight!"

0
Jose SanMar

I'm learning English, and some day I was studying and decided to take this photo from my book New Headway, and that's

0
en_lighten_up

Taken on a street in Chicago

0
Sonia Quinn

Would you really want to be tutored by the guys in my photo?

0
Jordan Yerman

... No.

 

 (This whole gallery is a cavalcade of greengrocers' apostrophes and what looks like LOLcat-style grammar. Hilarious!) 

0
justabrat

Rob, I love your writing style. You have a wonderful grasp of the English language, which is a very refreshing change from what I have been reading on the 'net' of late. It's disturbing to me to see the lack of language education in our young people.

It seems lately that grammar, spelling and punctuation have suffered. One of the first lessons in grammar that I can remember learning is that two negatives create a positive. I know the true intention of my sign photo is to inform users to not use any water. However, with the double negative, "Do not use no water," what it is actually telling us that we must use some. Believe me, I tried all the faucets and even the flush toilet, but none of them worked.

Another thing that I find disturbing is the use of ALL CAPS WITHOUT THE AID OF PUNCTUATION. When I come across a blurb or blog, or receive an email written that way, I immediately click on to the next. I have neither the time nor the patience to try and decipher nonsensical writings.

0
kevspace

I am "happy" to have contributed!!!

armchairsports
armchairsports
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 15:22 on December 7th, 2007

Rob Peters, I like this story. It is good stuff!

0
Gonzal3z2500

I've noticed a uprising in bad grammar. :[

0
denseatoms

Definately.

0
deecapp

I'm a student enrolled at the college where I photographed the sign and thought it was evidence the staff and administration finally learned to laugh at themselves. What you can't see at the bottom of the photo is: "including grammar guides" -- perhaps an homage to Apple's "Think Different" campaign?

0
Potjie

The "NOT" an "EXIT" sign is courtesy of our friends at the Transportation "Security" Agency at Philadelphia International Airport.

0
Dbleplus

I just couldn't believe that
a) this banner was made and
b) it was hung up despite the many errors.

Are there any articles around here about proofreading?

0
karlakp


0
Snoopermodel

This was taken in Paris. I wondered who the nuggets belonged to.

0
tlkativ

Spotted in Halifax, Nova Scotia... I assume this car belongs to an English teacher.

0
wildebeest

Apple festival in a small town in Missouri. Tenderlions, fryed. Couldn't help but capture it.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

armchairsports
First Flagged at 3:21 PM, Dec 7, 2007 by armchairsports
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in Culture

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from