NP Rank:
History and Analysis of Right-Wing attempts at Coup d'etat
As a writer with an academic past in philosophical analysis of political events, one of the issues which captures my attention is the idea of government overthrow: Its feasibility, the causes of its ideology, its agenda and its members. In my internet trawlings, I found this poignant piece, excellent in its backward look at an era paralleling our own in sensibilty and tone. From ObamersDotCom:
More and more each day, we hear people like Michelle Bachman inciting conservatives to stock up on guns and ammo and launch the revolution against Obama. Will they really do it?
It wouldnt be the first time. The first rightwing attempt to overthrow the government was driven by an alliance of big business and army veterans. The Liberty League consisted of very rich men in the 1930s who loathed FDR. They included leaders from DuPont, GM, EF Hutton, General Foods, GM, Montgomery Ward, JP Morgan, the Hearst newspapers, Lehigh University, Princeton, Yale, U.S. Steel, Standard Oil (Exxon), Chase National Bank, Goodyear, Birdseye Foods, Colgate, Heinz, Mutual Life...and Prescott Bush. Some Democratic leaders belonged. The group was so powerful that even New York Times gave them dozens of positive front-page stories. Prefiguring todays rightwingers, they screeched that FDRs policies betokened "a trend toward Fascist control," and the end of democracy." Their aim was to use WWI veterans to overthrow FDR so the fatcats could put their own man in. Their first choice to lead the charge was Douglas MacArthur, but the veterans hated him because he had crushed the Bonus Army march a year or two earlier, so they turned instead to another general, Smedley Butler, who (luckily for us all) had the good sense to blow the whistle on these loons in Congress.
Apparently there are groups who think seriously on the idea of coups, not only in the FDR era, but in our own time:
Another enabler which makes both small groups and large groups dangerous is the internet. The net can help lone wolves set up their own operations and acquire materials, and it can help larger groups organize without as much external scrutiny. A site to watch is Stormfront, owned by a former Klan leader. Stormfront encouraged their followers to join the army to learn military skills, and set up stories for kids, and computer games allowing kids to kill blacks and Jews. They skilfully use texts from the U.S. Founding Fathers, the Bible, and even Darwin for their survival-of-the-fittest philosophy. They are a better fit for the new century that the Liberty-League model or the Klan model would have been. In April 2009 one of its members killed three Pittsburgh cops and tried to kill nine more. Even if Stormfront is not the vanguard for an outbreak of violence, it might be the model for whoever does launch the Crazy Season..
The real brilliance to be found in this analysis in the understanding, set forth by Howe and Strauss in 1997, of the very real chance of a return to the idea of secession of states:
Also, secessionists: last year 22 percent of Americans believed that a state has a right to secede from the United States. Sarah Palin supported an Alaskan secession group, and Mike Huckabees most valued supporters include secessionists as well. Some militia groups have been involved.
Watch the northwest in particular: when white separatists start mooning about setting up their own all-white utopia somewhere, separate from the United States, the talk usually revolves around any state within shouting distance of Montana. Also, obviously, watch the South. For a while there, some New England liberals were talking secession, but a lot of that was a reaction to Bush and Iraq, and now that the Iraq issue is resolving itself, such tree-hugging folk are unlikely to get in bed with the Obama-haters of the loony right.
One thing to watch on the map: spikes in unemployment. When you have a small army of poor white trash sitting at home with no jobs and lots of guns, the recruiters for the nut-fudge groups roar into action. Look for one-factory towns that are losing their factories, and obvious places like the Auto Belt in Michigan and throughout the Midwest.
Also, watch the gun shows. They are not known (yet) as hotbeds of extremist activity but they have been known to sell the Turner Diaries and they are linked to criminal activity as well. Easy networking tool. .
Looking ahead to the real possibilities of right wing coups and secessionist revivals, the author is wise enough to analyse the stressors and the reality-based factor of timing. Having read - and taken seriously - the epic book by Harvard historians and futurists, Howe and Strauss, "The Fourth Turning: What History Has to Say about America's Next Rendezvous with Destiny" (Broadway Books, 1997), I learned that the saeculum of histoy indeed reveals cyclical and return events and motifs. Ergo, the Civil War is never really over; resentments from the FDR reign rage on, surviving in the right wing blogosphere, etc. . . .
Normally I would also watch for stressor events, but right now Obama himself is the stressor, like FDR before him: essentially the entire Obama administration is clearly going to set off gongs at Tin Foil HQ until the day he leaves office. Hes a black guy who is being forced by economic circumstances to expand the scope of government, and hes pro-choice and sympathetic to gays; although Obama (and his AG, also black) have repeatedly affirmed his support for the Second Amendment, and have tiptoed away from Obamas earlier rhetoric on assault weapons, the loons simply dont believe them, and are already collapsing into hysterics and stocking up on guns and ammo.
One thing working against the extremists, is that they may have waited too long. The popularity of Reagans mix of snake oil tax cuts for the fatcats, holy wars for the anti-abortion and anti-gay forces, brain-dead militarism and gun worship, contempt for the government began its arc across the sky in 1980 and crashed to earth in 2008. The exact mid-point the high-point of that parabolic arc was 1994, when they conquered Congress. At that point they should have launched the revolution. Instead, they launched Oklahoma, which backfired badly, and ensured Clintons landslide reelection. Now its a bit late in the day. The paradox of revolution is that when your ideas are in the ascendant, whipping up the anger among your hard-core adherents is difficult, but once your ideas are exposed as fallacious, everyone but the hard-core abandons you and the revolution wont go anywhere unless a million Joe Blows buy into it.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
ayres44
United States -
Susan Marie Kovalinsky
Ledgewood, New Jersey, United States
Recommendations (54)
-
A. Tran
New York, New York, United States -
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States -
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
-
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States -
Barry ORegan
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada -
Mary Richard
Toronto, Canada -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (35)
at 07:50 on August 30th, 2009
The birthers, who tenaciously continue to fill up court dockets with frivilous lawsuits and challenges to the Obama presidency, are a more bizarre example of an attempt at coup d'etat, which would be the hoped for outcome by those promoting this discredited notion.
When this began, Barack Obama was a senator and a candidate. Now, he is President of the United States.
Any and all activity around the issue of his birth seeks to unseat him after he was elected, by majority vote and an overwhelming electoral vote count.
at 13:22 on August 30th, 2009
Karen, I direct your attention to the fact that the 'Obama Camp' has spent over one million dollars to keep his birth certificate from being examined. Why?
at 14:11 on August 30th, 2009
Rhonda, this link proves nothing, certainly not any fact.
It merely makes the claim that millions have been spent. Where is the paper trail that would substantiate the money spent?
at 15:04 on August 30th, 2009
Where is the paper trail that would substantiate the money spent? Good question! Perhaps an idea can be found in this read: OBAMA: WHERE HAVE ALL HIS RECORDS GONE?
at 16:11 on August 30th, 2009
This link sheds no light on the money question, Rhonda.
So, as birthers chase down documentation in an effort to prove their obsession, leaving an ever growing trail of deadends in doing so, this is what's being offered as proof that millions were spent to prevent them from proving their claim?!?!
That is classic criterion for a conspiracy theory; it can't be proven.
Also at NowPublic :
The 'Right Wing' Conspiracy
at 16:39 on August 30th, 2009
Karen, I think this one will: Obama Birth Certificate Lawsuits.
at 17:00 on August 30th, 2009
Rhonda, this is more of the same, with the Conservapedia link you've posted listing a monetary figure that is not substantiated at the World Net Daily link provided by Conservapedia. The link offers speculation as to costs from some others.
The birther nonsense is viral. Someone says somebody said something about this, that or the other and BAM! They're off to the races and its gospel.
No one can disuade those who will continue this crusade. There is no logical response or method of reasoning that can be offered to those who embrace this cause.
at 17:04 on August 30th, 2009
"There is no logical response or method of reasoning that can be offered to those who embrace this cause."
What then is the logical response or method of reasoning that can be offered for those who do not embrace this cause?
at 12:07 on September 1st, 2009
Rhonda, I have pondered this query and concluded there is no way I can provide an answer to it without further offending those who may embrace the birther movement.
at 19:15 on September 1st, 2009
I understand, Karen. It is unfortunate that anyone would be offended at all. More unfortunate ( I think) is that you think you can not respond because it might offend some people. Thanks for getting back though!
at 20:09 on September 1st, 2009
No, Rhonda, this is more of a choice, like some of our mothers told us, if you don't have anything nice to say ....
Any response would have to contain lots of adjectives, maybe some adverbs, of the demeaning variety, to describe the birther movement and those still adhering to it, as my patience for this foolishness has reached way beyond its limit and therefore, I feel no need to discuss or debate this as if there is anything sensible about any of it.
Any future comments may also fall outside of NowPublic's Code of Conduct.
at 21:25 on September 1st, 2009
Understood:) Nevertheless, I suppose time will tell "if there is anything sensible about any of it."
at 13:33 on August 30th, 2009
PS And is only one of many articles on this fact.
at 06:25 on August 31st, 2009
But Karen, you should know Whiny Losers both Left and Right never like the outcome of the vote results, preferring their elected choice as president. The left threw a fit when Gore Lost out to Bush, the Birth Certificate thing is about the only thing they (grasp on straws) have on Obama.
at 09:00 on August 31st, 2009
Okay, Barry, without additional comment, I'll cede to you on the ' It's the only thing they got!' point. : )
at 08:06 on August 30th, 2009
Yes, true: And I have long felt that the real futility of the Birther movement is this: Precisely because Obama was elected so roundly, even if it were true - which it is not - but were it true that he was not born in the US, it would be far easier to ammend the US Constitution to accomodate this fact, than to unseat him, ha! ;)
at 17:29 on October 1st, 2009
Don't think you could actually pass a retroactive amendment do you?
What is done, was done under existing law. Getting an amendment thru 37 states would take years, even then it could only cover future candidates. If it were found that Obama was not in fact, a native born citizen, the chances of an amendment of that nature getting thru congress would be at or near zero.
By the bye....53% in a two candidate race is hardly being "roundly" elected. At least he did manage a majority...something Clinton never did.
at 08:54 on August 30th, 2009
I don't think that members of organizations such as StormFront, Skin Heads, Klan, etc. on their own pose as much of a threat as some believe--although they do pose quite a threat no doubt. And it's true that they have plenty of weapons--many of which are illegal--and that they hate the U.S. government and would just love to bag Obama and any Jew that got in the way (notice the emphasis on the word Jew). But I think that the real threat is when these groups team up with other extremists throughout the world. Call me crazy, call me a nut, or call me whatever you will: I have my suspicions that Timothy McVeigh was aided to an extent by middle eastern terrorists and that many home grown extremist organizations are in contact with members of over seas terrorist organizations.
at 10:39 on September 1st, 2009
Rory, if any links to any movement or ideology could be conjectured to have been an ideology with which Timothy McVeigh or Terry Nichols may have had an affinity or possible links, it would be with those that shared a similar mindset about the United States and the federal government, like the beliefs held by those in the Freeman Movement of Montana.
Timothy McVeigh's beliefs appear to have aligned with the beliefs of many of those involved in the sovereignty, militia and patriot movements.
Many are aware that when he was arrested in 1995, on the tee shirt he was wearing was pictured a tree with blood droplets, with the Thomas Jefferson quote that refers to martyrdom written on it:
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
at 09:01 on August 30th, 2009
Well, it would certainly make sense, wouldn't it? The McVeighs of America, having lost all respect, and believing this America to be false and an imposter of the original Republic - in my own way, I agree and sympathize - would have no hesitation in hooking about with Islamic terrorists and others; the latter would be more than happy to oblige them!
at 09:24 on August 30th, 2009
I understood that McVeigh was concerned with the attacks on Waco. I had always thought he represented a group of the disenfranchised but saw that no followups occurred and reassessed him as symbol of a large group. Malcom X was killed in an "inside job" , that is clear, and it does not surprise me that Farrakhan would be part of the will to be rid of him. Why was there no "revolution at the ballot box" to prevent the election of Obama?
at 09:42 on August 30th, 2009
Why was there no "revolution at the ballot box" to prevent the election of Obama?
Probably because Americans are not as racist as some would have us to believe . . .
Also, after eight years of Bush, the Republican party would have had to pull a rabbit out of a hat in order to get one of its own elected.
Yes! McVeigh was pissed off over what went down at Waco at the hands of Dowe Burnem and How. That was a new cabinet post formed under Janet Reno's direction. LOL!
at 09:49 on August 30th, 2009
That sun shadow analogy is both apt and eloquent, Nice!
at 10:03 on August 30th, 2009
Both parties dying. Yes. "Narcissitic supply": Is he, in your opinion, clinically narcissistic? I am not asking cynically, I actually noticed a few signs on my own, one in particular. Still love him, though. :(
at 10:06 on August 30th, 2009
Yes, had a Jungian ring to it. Very nice to hear, and to reference in the future; again, thanks.
at 10:49 on August 30th, 2009
Roy: I liked your analysis alot, it is Jungian, and more. Your semi-identification with Obama is very poignant and illuminating. I think you are correct in nearly all of your assertions. For all that, I love Obama and think he is where he ought to be. The times demand, perhaps, as a counterbalance and compensation to Bush's feelings of entitlement, a new liberal entitlement? Thanks so much for your comments, really rewarding. I think RNG meant Obama, and not you, were flawed.
at 10:54 on August 30th, 2009
:( ...................:(
at 11:09 on August 30th, 2009
I concure. Bush had eight years. Obama gets six months before being decried as a failure.
First, in terms of the economy-- the fiscal year of the federal government begins in October of the year before it is to be enacted. Second, in terms of promises of refom-- the legislative process of America takes time. It is this principle that seperates a democracy from radical revolution. Lastly, in terms of his public misques (ex. include Harvard proffesor issue)-- he will learn from all of them and they will decrease. His predesessors all had their fair share of public relations disasters. He has already attempted to rectify some of them.
at 11:11 on August 30th, 2009
Yes, I agree, Grace. :)
at 13:10 on August 30th, 2009
Conservatives and the Right Wing of the Republican Party, especially since the 2008 presidential election, have proven themselves totally bereft of any forward thinking plans or ideas, painting themselves into an ever shrinking corner of isolation.