NP Rank:
Hollywood heroines 'vapid and neurotic'
Women in movies - well the roles they play - have become 'dumber' and more stereotypical over the last 50 years according to a new report from Oxford University.
Women are mainly portrayed as 'vapid and neurotic' and the roles don't reflect the reality of many women's lives in the 21st century.
Heroines have been getting "dumber and dumber" in the 50 years since Audrey Hepburn and Bette Davis blazed a trail for strong on-screen women, according to Dr Diane Purkiss of Keble College.
Recent female leads make Bridget Jones, the scatterbrained singleton played by Rene Zellweger in 2001, look like a model of female independence, the feminist historian claimed.
"It's a sad day when you look back at Bridget Jones with some affection," she said.
"We really have reached a nadir in the way women are portrayed on screen," she said.
Releases including What Happens in Vegas – starring Diaz – 27 Dresses and Made of Honour were particularly guilty of reducing women to "explicitly anti-feminist stereotypes".
But Dr Purkiss also pointed to Bafta-nominated performances from Winslet in The Reader and Revolutionary Road, Angelina Jolie in Changeling and Kristin Scott Thomas in I've Loved You So Long as evidence of the decline of fully-formed female characters in films.
Crowd Power
-
LotusFlower
Nottingham, United Kingdom
Recommendations (33)
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
sara star
Halifax, NS, Canada -
Barry Artiste
Vancouver, Canada -
158
St. Louis, Missouri, United States -
Geneva B
Vancouver, Canada




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 15:54 on February 8th, 2009
Oh goodness. Don't even get me started on this topic! It is very tiring to witness the recurring female archetypes again and again - women are always playing the victim, are incomplete without some brawny male counterpart and are usually there for decorative purposes only. The media sends us powerful messages about who we are and who we should be. It is important we pay attention to what these messages are saying!
at 16:17 on February 8th, 2009
I have to agree with this article.