NP Rank:
Hundreds who posted views on sex assault trial targeted
FORT WORTH — Hundreds of people who posted their opinions of a sexual assault trial in an online forum are now the targets of a lawsuit.
The authors of those comments on a Web site thought they were anonymous, but this week, a judge ruled their names should be revealed.
The WFAA reporter characterizes the comments as "too graphic to be included in this story." I imagine anyone who has ever browsed mainstream internet forums have run across the same kind of thing.
I'm certainly not defending the comments made on this particular forum. But, it truly bothers me to find out that commenters can be sued for making supposedly anonymous comments.
Still, the burden of proof will be on the plaintiffs, and absent malice, the case is by no means a slam dunk. But who know how a sympathetic jury may rule? And, what effect would such a ruling have on blogs and forums?
We shall see.
Recommendations (22)

Anonymous user
-
René
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States -
Emilio Lizardo
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States -
Barry Artiste
Vancouver, Canada -
fwinstead
Washington, District Of Columbia, United States -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 16:31 on February 7th, 2009
Interesting - for many forums online, I think anonymous really means anonymous, but I suppose not everywhere. This is such an odd case. It will be interesting to see what the outcome is.
at 21:35 on February 7th, 2009
So much for freedom of speech
at 21:59 on February 7th, 2009
Currently this phenomenon is transforming the internet - when does criticism become slander ?
Practically speaking, it depends quite a lot on who the plaintiff's legal team is, and, of course how deep his pockets are ...
at 23:07 on February 7th, 2009
The comments section has some pretty interesting opinions, both pro and con.
Check it out