If genetic memory serves me

by YankeeJim | May 22, 2011 at 05:55 am
75 views | 0 Recommendations | 2 comments

Photos

Bronze Age Warriors | Photo 02

Bronze Age Warriors | Photo 02

see larger image

uploaded by YankeeJim

Long ago, R1a1’s developed metal implements and weapons. We started out by discovering that when certain rocks were in the fire, and after the fire went out, there was material left behind that was shiny and could be formed into useful shapes.

“She wanted something to dig with. I wanted something to hunt with. She got her way first. But, I eventually got a spear out of the deal.”

Then the neighboring tribes began to encroach on our garden and hunting area. We asked them to give to us some space and they refused. One of them stole a young girl from our tribe so we could not tolerate it any longer.

Over time, everyone in our tribe fashioned implements for hunting and warring – they were dual purpose. Some tribe members developed specialties in metal working.

Anyway, I appreciate the history while I butter my toast.


“Early Bronze Age battle site found on German river bank

By Neil Bowdler Science reporter, BBC News

Fractured human remains found on a German river bank could provide the first compelling evidence of a major Bronze Age battle.

Archaeological excavations of the Tollense Valley in northern Germany unearthed fractured skulls, wooden clubs and horse remains dating from around 1200 BC.

The injuries to the skulls suggest face-to-face combat in a battle perhaps fought between warring tribes, say the researchers.

The paper, published in the journal Antiquity, is based primarily on an investigation begun in 2008 of the Tollense Valley site, which involved both ground excavations and surveys of the riverbed by divers.

They found remains of around 100 human bodies, of which eight had lesions to their bones. Most of the bodies, but not all, appeared to be young men.

The injuries included skull damage caused by massive blows or arrowheads, and some of the injuries appear to have been fatal.

One humerus (upper arm) bone contained an arrow head embedded more than 22mm into the bone, while a thigh bone fracture suggests a fall from a horse (horse bones were also found at the site).

The archaeologists also found remains of two wooden clubs, one the shape of a baseball bat and made of ash, the second the shape of a croquet mallet and made of sloe wood.

Dr Harald Lubke of the Centre for Baltic and Scandinavian Archaeology in Germany said the evidence pointed to a major battle site, perhaps the earliest found to date.

"At the the beginning of the Neolithic, we have finds like Talheim in Germany, where we have evidence of violence, but it doesn't look like this situation in the Tollense Valley where we have many humans there in the riverbed," he told the BBC.

"We have a lot of violence from blunt weapons without any healing traces, and we have also evidence of sharp weapons. There are a lot of signs that this happened immediately before the victims died and the bodies are not buried in the normal way."

The archaeologists found no pottery, ornaments or paved surfaces which might be suggestive of formal graves or burial rituals.

Many of the bones appear to have been transported some distance by the river, although some finds appear to be in their original position.

The researchers suggest the bodies may have been dumped in the river before being washed away and deposited on a sandbar. Alternatively, the dead could have been killed on the spot in "the swampy valley environment", the paper concludes.

Dr Lubke believes the real conflict may have been fought out further up the river, and that the bodies so far found represent just a fraction of the carnage wrought by the battle.

"This is only a sample, what we have found up until now - the modern river bed only cuts across part of the river bed of that time. There are likely to be many more remains.

"It's absolutely necessary to find the place were the bodies came into the water and that will explain if it really was a battle or something else, such as an offering, but we believe that a fight is the best explanation at the moment."

Evidence was also found among the human remains of a millet diet, which is not typical of Northern Germany at the time, which the researchers say may betray the presence of invaders.

While bronze pins of a Silesian design could suggest contact with the Silesian region 400km to the south-east, they say.”


Possible time of origin

probably more recent than 18,500 years BP [1]

Possible place of origin

Asia,most probably South Asia. Other possibilities include Central Asia,Middle East, and Eastern Europe.

Ancestor

R1 (R-M173)

Descendants

R1a1a1 to R1a1a8. R-M458 being the most significant in Europe (R1a1a7 inUnderhill et al. (2009)).

Defining mutations

1. M420 now defines R1a in the broadest sense.[2]
2. Within R1a, SRY1532.2 also known as SRY10831.2, now defines R1a1, previously R1a.
3. M17 and M198 (equivalent to one another) now define R1a1a, previously R1a1, and often referred to as if equal to R1a.

Highest frequencies

Parts of Eastern EuropeScandinavia,Central AsiaSiberia and South Asia. (See List of R1a frequency by population)

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
"thirty-aught-six"

If genetic memory served -we wouldn't have been making the same mistakes over and over down through history.

0
zjkjue

cfukoqzqhsufzomvmqjyjkebgsacmx

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from