The incredible shrinking news

by mtippett | March 27, 2008 at 11:41 am
670 views | 17 Recommendations | 6 comments

Photos

Bill O'Reilly on TV

Bill O'Reilly on TV

see larger image

uploaded by futureatlas.com

Hey, what's that incredible sucking sound?  Oh, it's your news...
Think we hardly get any international news in our mainstream media? Right you are. But we don’t get any domestic coverage either, unless it’s about the elections, according to the insightful but not cheerful new State of the Media Report from the great folks at the Project for Excellence in Journalism:
“The agenda of the American news media continues to narrow, not broaden. A firm grip on this is difficult but the trends seem inescapable. A comprehensive audit of coverage shows that in 2007, two overriding stories — the war in Iraq and the 2008 campaign — filled more than a quarter of the newshole and seemed to consume much of the media’s energy and resources. And what wasn’t covered was in many ways as notable as what was. Other than Iraq — and to a lesser degree Pakistan and Iran — there was minimal coverage of events overseas, some of which directly involved U.S. interests, blood and treasure. At the same time, consider the list of the domestic issues that each filled less than a single percent of the newshole: education, race, religion, transportation, the legal system, housing, drug trafficking, gun control, welfare, Social Security, aging, labor, abortion and more.”
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Rachel Nixon

Now this is depressing. I refuse to believe that either the American public are not interested in these domestic issues, or that there is nothing to be said about them.

AlvarezGalloso
AlvarezGalloso
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 12:40 on March 27th, 2008

mtippett, I like this story. It's good stuff. I also agree with you and Rachel Nixon. There is not even news about alternative candidates.

Jordan Yerman
Jordan Yerman
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 13:23 on March 27th, 2008

It's painfully noticeable, and has been for years... news coverage is treated as an extension of the entertainment industry: both are fueled by advertising and delivered (primarily) via television, but that doesn't mean that the content should be the same. People can say what they want about user-generated news content (some of which is valid), but I'd rather read a few typos and swear words than see repetitive coverage of one easily-chewed story at the expense of a planetful of useful stuff.

0
René

It's all the fault of the news/media corporations, and those that control them. the 'GateKeepers'.

0
René

Isn't that what the 'ratings' is all about? How else do the public 'demand more' if not with their remotes. Don't forget that John Q. Public is not always computer-savvy or on the net for more than email.

0
traduzione

and then one wonders why people are getting so one-dimensional. still, for those who WANT to know more, internet has more information flow than one can handle.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from