Ireland to mark famine disaster

by infomatique | May 24, 2008 at 02:10 pm | 1077 views | 7 comments

The victims of the Irish Famine are to be remembered in an annual official memorial day, which is to be established in the Republic of Ireland.

It is believed that about one million people in Ireland starved in the 1840s after the failure of the potato crop.

Hundreds of thousands of others emigrated during the disaster, sparking a worldwide Irish diaspora.

The Irish government has set up an expert group to organise a yearly event.

Making the announcement, Community Affairs Minister Eamon O Cuiv said a committee would consider the various possibilities.

The minister, a grandson of former Taoiseach and President Eamon De Valera, said: "The effects of the Great Famine are still evident today and its legacy has given Irish people an appreciation of issues such as food security and a strong commitment to humanitarian aid and relief.

"If the Famine didn't happen, there could be 12 million people living in Ireland and eight million could be native Irish speakers."

The Famine resulted in large Irish communities settling in countries like the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

"These diaspora communities - the Irish abroad - still demonstrate a significant affinity with their migrant predecessors of the Famine," said Mr O Cuiv.



The Great Hunger (An Gorta Mór or An Drochshaol, litt: The Bad life) is a highly contentious period of history between 1845 and 1852 during which the population of Ireland was reduced by 20 to 25 percent. It is known by various names, such as The Great Famine in Ireland itself and The Irish Potato Famine internationally. The cause of the famine was a pathogenic water mould, Phytophthora infestans, the disease it causes is commonly known as late blight of potato. Though P. infestans ravaged potato crops throughout Europe during the 1840s, its human cost in Ireland was exacerbated by a host of political, social, economic, and climatological factors which remain the subjects of heated historical debate.

The famine was a watershed in the history of Ireland.Its effects extended well beyond its immediate demographic impact and permanently changed the island's political and cultural landscape. Forboth the native Irish and those in the resulting diaspora, the famine entered folk memory and became a rallying point for various nationalist movements.Virtually all modern historians of Ireland regard it as a dividing line in the Irish historical narrative, referring to the preceding period of Irish history as "pre-Famine."

The dominant economic theory in mid-nineteenth century Britain was laissez-faire (meaning: 'let be'), which held that it was not a government's job to provide aid for its citizens, or to interfere with the free market of goods or trade.


Despite laissez-faire, the initial response to the Famine under British Prime Minister Sir Robert Peel, was "prompt, efficient and interventionist." He sent over a Scientific Commission to examine the facts. The commissioners reported that one-half of the crop was now destroyed, or unfit for use, but they incorrectly diagnosed the cause of the blight.

THE CORN LAWS

Food prices in Ireland were beginning to rise, and potato prices had doubled by December, 1845. Meanwhile, the Irish grain crop was being exported to Britain. Public meetings were held, and prominent citizens called for the exports to be stopped and for grain to be imported as well. However, this would have meant repealing the Corn Laws, and there was great opposition in Britain to this.

"The Corn Laws, an exception to the doctrine of laissez-faire, laid down that large taxes had to be paid on any foreign crops brought into Britain. This kept grain prices high, and the British traders would lose profits if the laws were repealed". Since the Act of Union made Ireland legally a part of the United Kingdom, its corn crop could be moved to England without incurring the tax. However, corn crops brought into Ireland to relieve the famine could be taxed.

Prime Minister Peel pushed through a repeal of the Corn Laws in 1846. This split the Tory Party and Peel was forced to resign. In a powerful speech to Parliament he said, "Good God, are you to sit in cabinet and consider and calculate how much diarrhea, and bloody flux, and dysentery a people can bear before it becomes necessary for you to provide them with food?" (

LORD JOHN RUSSELL

Peel was succeeded at Prime Minister by Lord John Russell, a rigid exponent of laissez-faire. In October, 1846, as it became clear that over ninety per cent of the potato crop of Ireland was blighted, Lord Russell set out his approach to the famine: "It must be thoroughly understood that we cannot feed the people...We can at best keep down prices where there is no regular market and prevent established dealers from raising prices much beyond the fair price with ordinary profits."

Russell's policies emphasized employment rather than food for famine victims, in the belief that private enterprise, not government, should be responsible for food provision. He also stressed that the cost of Irish relief work should be paid for by Irishmen. Peel's Relief Commission was abolished and relief work was put in the hands of 12,000 civil servants in the Board of Works who only found work for 750,000 of the starving people. In return for hard (and often pointless) work, starving peasants were paid starvation wages.

Tens of thousands of people died during the winter of 1846, but "Russell and his colleagues never conceived of interfering with the structure of the Irish economy in the ways that would have been necessary to prevent the worst effects of the famine."


Add a comment Comments (7)

jordan
good stuff:

Great framing for this story- thanks!

amyjudd
good stuff:

infomatique, I like this story and great photos!

Beaulieu
good stuff:

infomatique, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Karen Hatter
good stuff:

Infomatique, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Barry Artiste
good stuff:

infomatique, I like this story. It's good stuff. Hundreds of thousands did not have to die, but during that time Britain did not try and stop the famine though they have more than enough food in their stores to feed the Starving Irish, who were predominately Catholic, certainly a dark part of British History many Britons prefer to forget, but the Irish will never. 

Do Irish today hold a grudge demanding compensation from the British Government? You would certainly think so, and deservedly so, though this trend seems to be all the rage amongst other cultures demanding compensation whose ancestors 100 years ago were mistreated by Western Society and not Killed, save for First Nations, though North Americans reluctance to allow the Jewish people to land on North American shores surely ensured their death cruise back to Germany . 

Many of these cultures seem to forget the Irish were allowed to starve to death by the hundreds of thousands, where as other cultures were merely barred from entering Canada or the USA, certainly a stark contrast where  these Cultures hold onto the past instead of working towards the future, like the Irish ensuring the Irish Famine and other similar atrocities never happen again under our watch.

As my ancestors immigrated to Quebec in the early 1700's they missed the famine, but before the famine, Irish life as oppressive and murderous  under British Rule.

infomatique

Barry,

I have added a bit more explaining the "Corn Laws" which may give more insight to the attitude of the British establishment.

Laissez-faire sounds a bit like modern globalisation economics.

The strange thing is that the Irish abroad are more likely to hold a a grudge against the British than those of us who now live in Ireland, this could be because we survived while others died or had to go abroad leaving more land available for those who remained.


Barry Artiste

I am aware of the Corn Laws, having been a student of Military history in military college, though Peel was adverse to it , others in Parliament were against Peel, the exporting of food out of Ireland when a million starved to death, shows that when the Corn law changed in  1849, it was 9 years too late for Irish Citizens.

I do not think the Irish abroad today should hold a grudge, as it was a century and a half ago,certainly any British Royal and British Government 20 years after the Irish Famine should not be held accountable by the actions of their predecessors,back then and today, as it would be non nonsensical to do so, they had no hand in it.  Hence why Irish Peoples abroad and at home move forward, and get on with the task of living, but never forget and ensure society learns from it's past mistakes.

Thanks for bringing this important story to Now Public, it is nice to read the past of ones culture coming from a citizen of Ireland.




Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

May 24, 2008 at 02:10 pm by infomatique, 1077 views, 7 comments

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from