NP Rank:
Jung's 'Red Book' to be released: Sun NY Times mag
" Once it's published, there will be a 'before' and 'after' in Jungian scholarship."
~Sonu Shamdasani
The releasing of the Red Books, CG Jung's confessions of mid-life, mark a new era in Jungian scholarship.
A secret and controversial book written by the famous analyst, CG Jung, is pending global publication, after long debate by family, friends, and trustees of Jung's esate. One wonders what the Red Book will do for future students of Jung, and also for his detractors:
This past Sunday, the weekly New York Times magazine section had the pending release of the mysterious author's credo as its front page feature; within its pages, a lengthy and complex story of the Red Books and of the ensuing debate about publication takes up dozens of pages. These Red Books , newly discovered by scholars, if not by Jung's close family and friends, will mark a juncture in Jungian scholarship.
This is a story about a nearly 100-year-old book, bound in red leather, which has spent the last quarter century secreted away in a bank vault in Switzerland. The book is big and heavy and its spine is etched with gold letters that say “Liber Novus,” which is Latin for “New Book.” Its pages are made from thick cream-colored parchment and filled with paintings of otherworldly creatures and handwritten dialogues with gods and devils. If you didn’t know the book’s vintage, you might confuse it with a lost medieval tome.And yet between the book’s heavy covers, a very modern story unfolds. It goes as follows: Man skids into midlife and loses his soul. Man goes looking for soul. After a lot of instructive hardship and adventure — taking place entirely in his head — he finds it again.
Some people feel that nobody should read the book, and some feel that everybody should read it. The truth is, nobody really knows. Most of what has been said about the book — what it is, what it means — is the product of guesswork, because from the time it was begun in 1914 in a smallish town in Switzerland, it seems that only about two dozen people have managed to read or even have much of a look at it. . . .
. . . Shamdasani figures that the Red Book’s contents will ignite both Jung’s fans and his critics. Already there are Jungians planning conferences and lectures devoted to the Red Book, something that Shamdasani finds amusing. Recalling that it took him years to feel as if he understood anything about the book, he’s curious to know what people will be saying about it just months after it is published. As far as he is concerned, once the book sees daylight, it will become a major and unignorable piece of Jung’s history, the gateway into Carl Jung’s most inner of inner experiences. “Once it’s published, there will be a ‘before’ and ‘after’ in Jungian scholarship,” he told me, adding, “it will wipe out all the biographies, just for starters.” What about the rest of us, the people who aren’t Jungians, I wondered. Was there something in the Red Book for us? “Absolutely, there is a human story here,” Shamdasani said. “The basic message he’s sending is ‘Value your inner life.’ ”
After it was scanned, the book went back to its bank-vault home, but it will move again — this time to New York, accompanied by a number of Jung’s descendents. For the next few months it will be on display at the Rubin Museum of Art. Ulrich Hoerni told me this summer that he assumed the book would generate “criticism and gossip,” but by bringing it out they were potentially rescuing future generations of Jungs from some of the struggles of the past. If another generation inherited the Red Book, he said, “the question would again have to be asked, ‘What do we do with it?’ ”



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (1)
at 11:42 on September 22nd, 2009
I have to say that I am interested, of course, in what is there. The difference between someone who is genuinely in the midst of the process and someone who is an "expert" about it, is that Jung's newest work probably could only change my take on what the man was about, while I go on with my own work on myself based on Janov/Reich, Jung, Gurdjieff, Castaneda and so on.
What does frighten me are those terrible predictions of his about what is coming!