Justice Gomery’s “love of sensationalism” is said to have lead to some tainted Liberal reputations

by Yuliya Talmazan | June 26, 2008 at 04:01 pm
127 views | 0 Recommendations | 0 comments

Videos

NDP: Peter Julian on the Gomery Report 2

see larger video

sourced by Yuliya Talmazan

NDP: Peter Julian on the Gomery Report 2
Federal Court has acquitted Jean Chrétien and Jean Pelletier of their involvement in the sponsorship scandal, which ultimately lead Liberals to fall from power. Judge Max Teitelbaum criticized John Gomery, who presided over the sponsorship inquiry, saying Gomery was  “not impartial and preoccupied with the media” during the case.

Gomery made "inappropriate and ill-advised comments," including the statement that Chrétien's handing out of golf balls emblazoned with his name was "small-town cheap."

That had a detrimental effect on the fairness of the hearings into the sponsorship affair, because the public could conclude that Gomery had prejudged the issues he was supposed to investigate, Teitelbaum said.


Gomery reacts, saying he is disappointed about being called a “biased judge.” He is looking to appeal today’s court decision.

"When you're seriously criticized by a judge who points out errors and inappropriate comments that you made, it's not pleasant — to read about the mistakes that you have made or might have made," Gomery told CBC News. 'It is particularly disappointing that I am held to be, appear to be, a biased judge.”

Although Chrétien and Pelletier supporters claim the two are “totally vindicated” now, the public opinion may be hard to reverse.

The Gomery inquiry used up $50 million of taxpayers' money.





Comments (0)

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from