NP Rank:
Latest New York Magazine examines Obama haters
"Violent fantasies, even cartoonish ones, as these seemed to be, have a way of becoming real". ~ New York Magazine, Phillip Weiss
On Today with President Obama, the latest edition of New York Magazine excerpts are supplied, from the article which examines Obama haters on the right. It is an interesting read; particularly because journalist Weiss makes it clear that emotions are driving this train moreso than ideology.
This movement by a small group of haters, led by Beck, Limbaugh and Hannity, could ultimately lead to violence because these people have lost their collective minds. Glenn Beck is clearly mentally ill. I don't care how many psychologists he pays to bring on his show. His level of paranoia is abnormal.I don't know how those folks can get up everyday and spew so much hate. Their insides must be rotting.
This week's New York magazine explores and nails the Obama haters, the ones that all the republicans deny, including prominent ones, such as David Brooks and George Will. The crazies are a small, obnoxious and dangerous group of people. Bill Cosby and Jimmy Carter have it exactly right. The only way we're going to stop these folks is to denounce them at every opportunity, shame them, apply the peer pressure. Show their children that what their parents are doing is not right. Republicans ought to be condemning the haters. But they won't do anything until an act of violence takes place. Obama can't stop them. But democrats should stand up and so should the rest of the sane population. Some excerpts (read in full):
All around were satanic representations of President Barack Obama in whiteface, as a Nazi, an African witch doctor, a Marxist, a Muslim, and Che Guevara’s best friend—but Kathy Golya had never felt so good about the new administration as she did right now. It was a day after Representative Joe Wilson’s outburst in Congress, and the South Carolina congressman had given voice to Golya’s inner heart. He hadn’t just said it on the Internet, he had said it to the president himself.
No, it was not the appropriate place, Golya said, but still she glowed with the memory. “It was the first time in my life I felt good, since he got into office. Someone had called him a liar.”
A prim, slender homemaker in her fifties from northeastern Pennsylvania, Golya had come out to a tea party in Scranton with her friend Donna Biscontini to have solidarity with everyone else with strong criticisms of the president. Not really criticisms, actually, but feelings—anger, upset, a sense of dispossession. There had been a kind of revolution in the country with Obama’s election, the women felt. They talked about the president’s “czars.” One of the czars believed that animals should have lawyers to sue their owners. “Animals have more rights than people,” Biscontini said. Another was for forced sterilization. “Who’s that sound like? Hitler,” Golya said. The president was putting himself at a godly level, was her point; he was saying that man controls his destiny, not God. She saw that as arrogance. She mentioned that the president’s wife wore $600 shoes when she was helping the poor.
Golya, who was Kittykat on the Internet, saw her conflict with Obama as a battle of souls. She prayed for the president every day. “For his conversion.”
I asked her if she thought he was a secret Muslim. “Only he knows that; we don’t know that,” she said. “I’m praying for the conversion of his heart.”
....
When Rush Limbaugh talked about “two Americas,” he wasn’t wrong. The haters’ focus on Che Guevara, Saul Alinsky, and Bill Ayers was a kind of projection. They were radicals, and the sixties provided the readiest role models. They were determined to be the counter-counterculture, and they weren’t going away.
“It’s like if Che Guevara had written Profiles in Courage,” Cashill says, seizing on the left-wing revolutionary hero whose image crops up with surprising frequency on posters in the tea-party rallies. “If people had known before the election, 1960, not only had JFK not written Profiles in Courage but his old man bought him the Pulitzer Prize, that would have cost him the election.”
Then Cashill injected the race issue. He said he had been embarrassed to buy Obama’s book in the Detroit airport, but the black clerk had been gushing and thrilled. What did race have to do with authorship?
The Obama people at first thought that the birthers would simply go away or, maybe even better, lead the Republican Party into the light of truth, where the party would continue to shrivel. That didn’t happen.
....
This was the real concern raised by the haters. Violent fantasies, even cartoonish ones, as these seemed to be, have a way of turning real. Nancy Pelosi has likened the hateful rhetoric boiling up during the health-care debate to the anti-gay reaction that formed against the gay-rights movement in San Francisco in the seventies, culminating of course in the murder of mayor George Moscone and supervisor Harvey Milk. Before John Kennedy was assassinated, right-wingers in Texas accused him of “treason.” Today’s Obama haters throw that word around more often than the left had thrown around Fascism. At an Obama town hall in New Hampshire, a man carried a gun along with a poster of a DON’T TREAD ON ME snake with the legend IT IS TIME TO WATER THE TREE OF LIBERTY, referring to the Thomas Jefferson quote about renewing the republic with blood.
Ed Hale was obviously a bullshitter, but he took it way too far. A minute after he said he’d never ever threaten anyone’s life, he said, “My biggest villain right now is Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. Those jackasses should be found guilty of treason, stood up against a wall, and shot.”
Crowd Power
-
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States
Recommendations (31)
-
Chevalier de Pas
Santa, Christmas Island -
Blue Crush
Toronto, Canada 
Anonymous user
-
Spydermonkey
huntsville, Alabama, United States -
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States -
The_Cynic
Freddy Beach, Where the deer r, Canada -
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
Karen Hatter
All Locations, Everywhere, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 05:58 on September 21st, 2009
at 06:41 on September 21st, 2009
Hey, it is the same story as yesterday: one-sided analysis. As a fan of Jung, one-sidedness is the bane of wholeness.
The loons always look like loons until you get it that they have something. Treating opponents like loons, "others" them, denigrates them and makes it easier to use force against them.
Bush and Palin Derangement Syndrome ran and still run rampant. Very, very ugly.
The movie is called "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest".
Lobotomize the opposition socially by denying their interpretations.
And, then along comes Camille Paglia, a real interpreter and thinker, and says that there really is a problem there.
at 10:00 on September 21st, 2009
Ask not what your country can do for you; as what you can do for your country.
American civility is dead?
Take America back? To where? 40 years ago? How will that solve any problems?
- reply
FreeSpoken (not verified)at 23:30 on October 3rd, 2009
Yeah! Let's pressure people to stop them from excercising their freedom of speech! If I don't agree with it, well, you can't say it! Thanks for making vague references to Jimmy Carter and Bill Cosby quotes... What were those quotes, and what were they in reference to? Even a 6th grade student knows that if you don't cite evidence you might as well not say anything at all. I'm not saying I agree with "Obama Haters" but I do believe that everyone has the right to voice their opinion and express their likes and dislikes ESPECIALLY when it concerns elected officials. That is the American way and it is one of the principals on which our country was founded and to suggest that people be oppressed and abused based on their beliefs is just plain wrong. P.S. Che Guevara? How can a man who personally executed several hundred people, regardless of their crimes, be simplified into "the counter-culture"? He was a prison warden! As for JFK writing Profiles in Courage, it is a common belief that it was in fact written by speechwriter Ted Sorensen. Herbert Parmet, a prominent historian, reviewed several documents and interviewed people involved in the writing of the book, and discovered that "an overwhelming volume of the book" was not infact Kennedy's words. Also, an enormous amount of information (documents and witnesses) has come to light concerning Joseph Kennedys involvement in JFKs election. Regardless of our nations debt to him, and his tragic passing, it is still quite clear that his election was effected in a major way by the illegal efforts of his father. I won't cite a source, purely because anyone from a History Channel host to a Kennedy Historian can name plenty.