The Lawless Bondurant Brothers

by zmandell | August 10, 2012 at 10:17 am
48072 views | 10 Recommendations | 6 comments

While the United States is largely a law-abiding society, most Americans do not consider the manufacture and sale of illegal alcohol as much of a crime. If anything, freedom-loving Americans think of bootleg distillers as underground heroes who do the dirty work of fighting government intrusion.

The reality of bootlegging is very different from its heroic image. Bootlegging was the work of criminal gangs who were no more moral than La Cosa Nostra or the drug gangs of today. Violence was directed against competing gangs just as much as it was against law enforcement agents. Nevertheless, the romantic image of bootlegging remains in the hearts and minds of Americans.

It is against this backdrop of imagined heroism and real violence that "Lawless" tells the story of the Bondurant brothers. The brothers, Forrest, Jack and Howard Bondurant, were actual bootleggers. They were active during Prohibition, when bootlegging morphed from a backwoods exploit to a national industry. After all, during that ill-conceived dry spell, bootleggers and smugglers were the only sources of liquor.

The plot of the story is a typical romantic version of the conflict between bootleggers and law enforcement. The Bondurant brothers are clearly portrayed as the good guys, whereas law enforcement agents are depicted as evil interlopers who try to block the success of three enterprising young men. In this particular case, the law enforcement agents are also on the wrong side of the law. They are not looking to shut down the Bondurant operations. Instead, they want what many Prohibition-era cops and sheriffs sought, namely, part of the profits in exchange for immunity from arrest.

Matt Bondurant, a grandson of Jack Bondurant, wrote the book on which "Lawless" is based. Therefore, the film relates events as seen and recorded by Jack Bondurant, the youngest of the three brothers. Shia LaBeouf, an up-and-coming movie star and box-office draw, plays Jack in the film. As the youngest brother, Jack tries to impress his older brothers and live up to their local reputations as heroes. Tom Hardy portrays the tough Forrest Bondurant, who is considered practically invincible after defying severe illness as well as the vicissitudes of life as a bootlegger. The eldest brother, Howard Bondurant, is a fragile man who suffered psychological damage after serving in World War I. He is an alcoholic, which is often a fatal flaw for a moonshiner. Jason Clarke portrays Howard in "Lawless." Jessica Chastain, a classical theater and indie film star, is the female lead of the film. She plays Maggie, a city girl who becomes involved with the Bondurants and manages their illegal saloon.

The brothers' chief nemesis is the new special deputy, Charlie Rakes. Rakes is from Chicago, which was known for violent bootlegger gang warfare during Prohibition. It was also known for police corruption, and Rakes is treacherous and corrupt as well as violent. Big city crime enters the film in another persona, that of Floyd Banner, a city slicker who becomes a partner in the Bondurant enterprise. Jack Bondurant is especially anxious to use Banner's talents and connections to break into the big leagues of illegal alcohol production and distribution.

It is precisely here where the line between the romantic image of Prohibition bootleggers and the reality of the social decay that they fomented is drawn. When bootlegging remained in Franklin County, Virginia, the scene of "Lawless," it was indeed a backwoods rebellion against government authority. Violence did occur between local gangs, but this violence often arose out of old family feuds as much as it did from disputes over bootlegging territory. Once the sophisticated gangsters from cities like Chicago brought their ruthlessness and gang mentality to the Virginia mountains, rural bootlegging became a blight on society, much as drug dealing is today.

Matt Bondurant has actually tasted bootleg liquor, as he readily admits that family members continue to distill it. While illicit distilling is a felony, small rural stills are hardly the threat that their Prohibition-era predecessors were. Small-scale bootlegging is once again more of a hobby than a crime, and the only way to experience the days of the old bootleggers is by watching films like "Lawless."

"Lawless" is not a documentary, and it is clear that Matt Bondurant created a romantic portrayal of his family's past in the book upon which this film is based. Nevertheless, it will attract history buffs and fans of documentaries along with those who appreciate gangster and Western movies. "Lawless" recreates a world that disappeared long ago. It portrays that world in a positive light without completely ignoring or glossing over the most negative parts of that world.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
VBush

I can appreciate your thoughts on the making of the movie 'Lawless' and your position on the fact that we actually romanticize bootleggers as some sort of folk hero versus the fact that they were actually outlaws....but were they really?Our government is completely out of control invading  our lives in every aspect. The constitution has basically been relegated to a piece of history ignored by everyone except historians. The civil war was fought for the very same reasons...although most would argue it was about slavery. A total bunch of crap, perpetuated by ignorant uneducated so called historians.We will most likely see more people scoffing at government intervention in our lives, and unfortunately, they will be reported as nut jobs in our mass media....because in the end...we are a nation of blind, deaf, dumb, sheep. Observe the posts on our social networking sites, it is sad, sad, sad.What's my point? They were folk heroes in my opinion. It was never up to the federal government to even introduce the Volstead Act, much less pass it. It's not their damn job!

0
Stephanieee

It's way to easy romanticize bootleggers, I agree. They were outlaws not because of the the distilling they did (I myself think "so what" about distiling..) but the violent acts they committed. Think about how many unnecessary murders and shootings these guys did? And VBush can still call the folk heroes? This is no Robin Hood stealing from the rich to give to the poor. In my opinion, folk heroes don't shoot guns to kill. 

3
Carolyn Davis

Living in an adjacent county to Franklin, I have read books about this time period. I am very excited about seeing this film. When there is a great division between the rich and the poor with the scarcity of jobs, men do what they must to survive. Moonshining was one way to do this as it was a tradition amonst the Scot-Irish. Their receipes go back for hundreds of years.

0
Kate E.

small rural stills are hardly the threat that their Prohibition-era predecessors were.Continue reading at NowPublic.com: The Lawless Bondurant Brothers | NowPublic News Coverage www.nowpublic.com/culture/lawless-bondurant-brothers#ixzz254NtZMV7Shows what you know about rural communities and rural bootleggers...I live in a 'dry' county and the bootleggers biggest customers are kids!

0
K Alan

why does the author postulate that the bootleggers and smugglers brought about social decline?!   in point of fact, the very people who outlawed alcohol were enjoying it the moment they left the floor of Congress... it was and remains a shining beacon of hypocrisy and the reason we cannot as Americans allow for government to become big and to 'take care of us.'  they take care of themselves, and the rest of us suffer, including the bootleggers... so the social decline is the willingness of those in power to ignore the rules they apply to others and to ignore reason in applying laws that fit their 'vision' of what should be instead of what is.   Bootlegging REMAINS proof that when the government tries to be an absolute dictator the people find ways around the law.  If it is true that the law in this story was also only interested in themselves, and that the brothers were merely supplying their product to customers who watned it and protecting themselves from encroachment by others, it is completely plausible to see them as heroes... we accept alcohol use today, and had before prohibition, so comparisons to drug dealers today would be crass... but arguably appropo.  I would argue the clearly more rapid decline in the users of hard drugs compared to alcohol mitigates the double standard, with the notable exception of marijuana, which our government continues to treat in a more heavy handed and thoughtless manner than it deserves... much like prohibition.   Oh well, drink you kool-aid, kids, let the government take care of you, they know what's best...

0
Lawless in a New Generation

Until our government walks in the shoes of poor country people trying to put food on the table, they will NEVER know what is best for us. I don't condone breaking the law, BUT the law is only as good as the people who wear the badge. Moonshining is as much a part of our history as anything. It like marijuana is only illegal because our government hasn't figured out how to PROPERLY tax it to their benefit. Once they do they will legalize it, so my point is why is it ok for the government to say something is ok, but not for the people to say it is ok. I mean none of the data that they use to supress it now will change, all of the risks will still be there, the ONLY change will be that the government found a way to make it beneficial enough to them to say it is ok to be legal. Our government has sold us out on more levels than I even want to think about... Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose. How much do we have to lose before we take a stand???

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 4:47 PM, Aug 21, 2012 by Anonymous (not verified)

Related Stories

Recommendations (10)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from