Man Freed By DNA Review After 18 Years

by Gh0s7 | August 11, 2008 at 09:32 pm
726 views | 12 Recommendations | 5 comments

Photos

Electron Microscope Coloured DNA Strand on Black

Electron Microscope Coloured DNA Strand on Black

see larger image

uploaded by the_tjb

This article is about a man that was released from prison after 18 years because he was cleared by DNA evidence. This brings up a topic about the wrongful convinctions of innocent men to prison and even death. It has happened many times in the past, however it seems to be happening more and more often. And now only a few of these people are given the chance for a DNA review of there case. Granted, nothing can be totally perfect in its operation, it just seems so wrong to me, to sentence an innocent man to life in prison or even death.

(AP) A judge on Monday released a man who spent nearly 18 years in prison on a charge he raped a 10-year-old girl after a lab re-examining cases across Ohio showed that his DNA profile doesn't match evidence from the crime scene.

Robert McClendon, 52, was the first inmate to be tested in the review.

He was transported Monday from the Chillicothe Correctional Institution to a courtroom where he met with lawyers from the Ohio Innocence Project, a nonprofit legal clinic based at the University of Cincinnati.

Franklin County Common Pleas Judge Charles Schneider, citing the DNA test, granted McClendon's release from custody.

"You know, you go through times where you feel it might not happen, but you never, ever give up hope," McClendon said after his release. "You don't ever use the word, 'never happen.' It's not healthy."

Jennifer Bergeron, a lawyer with the Innocence Project, said she expects prosecutors to formally drop charges against McClendon within the next two weeks.

Franklin County Prosecutor Ron O'Brien, who must decide whether to seek a new trial, said he hasn't been able to discuss the new developments with the victim or her family. Continuing to prosecute the case seemed unlikely, he said.

"I do not think it's heading to a new trial," O'Brien said.

McClendon was reserved in court.

"To be in prison for 18 years for something you didn't do and then know you are going to walk out of court a free man, that's a lot to take in in one day," Bergeron said.

McClendon planned to go to the home of a relative in Columbus on Monday to celebrate his release at a dinner with about 50 supporters, friends and relatives, said Mark Godsey, faculty director of the Innocence Project.

Longer term, McClendon said he wants to get a good job, maybe start a business and, if he's needed, speak publicly on DNA testing.

"This is not just about me," he said. "I believe that there are others in prison like me, and then there are others in prison who are guilty. You've got to give it a chance to work."

McClendon, who denied raping the girl, was convicted in 1991 and sentenced to 15 years to life in prison. He was denied parole in 2007.

DNA Diagnostics Center, a lab north of Cincinnati, agreed to conduct tests on McClendon and other inmates for free as a public service after The Columbus Dispatch published a series in January featuring 30 inmates whose applications for new DNA testing had been stalled.

The newspaper's investigation also found flaws in the state's DNA testing system — police and courts routinely discard evidence after trials, and prosecutors and judges often dismiss inmate applications for DNA testing without a stated reason.

In McClendon's case, authorities had long since lost or thrown away swabs from the victim's medical exam — typically the best evidence for testing rape cases — but agreed to provide the lab with the girl's underwear.

Using new technology that was unavailable at the time of the crime, the lab found faint traces of semen that didn't match McClendon's DNA profile, the Innocence Project announced last month.

Prosecutors said McClendon took a 10-year-old relative from her backyard, blindfolded her, drove her to a house and raped her. The victim reported the rape the next day and was taken to a hospital.

McClendon was convicted largely on the victim's testimony, Bergeron said. There was no physical evidence to tie him to the crime, she said.

McClendon had a prior record. He was convicted in the 1970s of attempted corruption of a minor for having sex with a 15-year-old girl when he was 19.
recommend Add a comment
Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 21:55 on August 11th, 2008

Gh0s7, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Paschen
Paschen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 01:25 on August 12th, 2008

18 years is a long, very long time in a human life!

duo
duo
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 02:18 on August 12th, 2008

Gh0s7, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Thank you for printing this truth, Gh0s7.  There should be a law that if DNA evidence is available, testing must be done.  Too many people are imprisoned and denied their tests, including Thomas Arthur in Alabama.  He was granted a last minute reprieve on July 30, when he was to be executed the next day.  Another man confessed to his crime.  Yet, Arthur remained on death row, denied the opportunity to test his DNA.  Read the letter written by six men sentenced to die but later exonerated by DNA evidence at this link:  http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/1081.php.

Mary

 

0
Gh0s7

Thank you for the comment and flag Mary. This happens way too much in our country, and I am sure others. I can imagine that sometimes the pull for the DA to win more cases can cause a dilemna.

0
Lazara

I have been doing a lot of research on how DNA is tested and used and I can't believe that even though it's stated that it's still impossible to link one direct person to the offense, DNA testing is still used.  If your innocent or if your guilty, DNA does not really matter because even if the odds are 1 in 11 million, being sentenced to prison based on DNA testing is just wrong because it's not 100% reliable.  It's either 100% accurate because even at 99% accurate, that 1% chan

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from