NP Rank:
Menifee Schools Ban Dictionary, Pull Book from Shelves
Menifee school officials have pulled the Merriam Webster's 10th Edition dictionary from schools after a parent complained an elementary student came across the term "oral sex" while in class.
The dictionary will be further reviewed to see if it should be permanently banned. District Spokeswoman Betti Cadmus says the entry was "sexually graphic" and not suitable for children in elementary school. "It's just not age appropriate."
Parents and Board Members Split on Dictionary Ban
Not everyone is happy about the ban, as some see the situation as an overreaction. Board member Rita Peters one parent's complaint shouldn't dictate how the entire district - which serves 9,000 children from kindergarten to grade 8 - should be run.
"The standard needs to be consistent ... We don't need parents setting policy."
Peter Scheer, executive director of the California First Amendment Coalition says, "Common sense seems to be lacking in this school."
The dictionaries were purchased a few years ago for 4th and 5th grade classrooms. Menifee is a city of about 67,000 people 80 miles southeast of Los Angeles.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Michael Small
Vancouver, Canada
Recommendations (31)
-
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 
Anonymous user
-
caj1
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
marianmo
Mission, Canada -
158
St. Louis, Missouri, United States -
Susan Marie Kovalinsky
Ledgewood, New Jersey, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (17)
at 12:41 on January 25th, 2010
I thought this story was a joke when I first read it. The first step is firing whichever officials suggested banning a dictionary.
at 17:25 on January 25th, 2010
hmm wonder why the kid looked up oral sex........what other words did he look up and where had he heard that word...methinks some sex ed is warrented here by the parents then it woyuldnt be a problem
at 17:26 on January 25th, 2010
Well, they do use many dirty words> )
at 18:15 on January 25th, 2010
And the second step is firing whichever 'official' said, "We don't need parents setting policy."
at 18:56 on January 25th, 2010
BTW, my comment (above) is not meant to imply that the Dictionary should be banned.
at 16:12 on January 26th, 2010
Just to let everyone know, it wasn't just "oral sex" that the parent complained about. There were slang sexual terms like (blow job, c--t, f'd up). These have no business in the dictionary. This is not sensorship, it is common sense. Whether anyone wants to admit it there is still right and wrong. Webster was wrong by putting these in there.
at 07:11 on February 5th, 2010
It is "C”ensorship, with a "C" not "S", my uneducated & very naive friend. Do you realize that these school children are also hearing these words everyday, as well as being inundated with them on the internet, like it or not? Putting our kids, the very future of this great country, in a box in order to protect their minds from “bad words” or knowledge that some naive tight ward like you deems safe or not, is frightening to say the least. Webster is not "wrong", you are. You are the only one here that needs to "admit" that you have no adult concept of what "right or wrong" is. You need to grow up, not the kids. Since you agree with censoring books, words and/or information, go move to China where you will be welcomed... Your Nazi views (they had the same feelings as you on this type of issue, fact) are not welcome in America.
at 17:38 on February 11th, 2010
*applause!*
at 19:32 on January 27th, 2010
Adolph Hitler would be proud.
at 19:59 on February 4th, 2010
@ M Bell:If the words exist, they belong in the dictionary, appropriately marked as slang.Language is a dynamic medium. It has no right or wrong.A word on a page is not actually harmful to a child. The Idea that a word (essentially a sequence of letters) can be offensive independently of its meaning is one of the most asinine facets to our society.What is supposedly harmful is the idea encapsulated by that word. However, this is mostly due to the parents sensibilities. Even if the material was fairly explicit, the child would be unlikely to understand the meaning with prior background in the subject. At that point, the "harm" is already done.In parting, in what way, exactly, does the knowledge harm this child? In truth, it is the parents indoctrinated version of what is "proper" that is driving their antics.
at 05:03 on February 6th, 2010
Aren't they going to gather all of the dictionaries and any book containing the words "Oral" and "Sex" (not necessarily together) and burn them?Just another case of the religious reich going into hysterics over trivia that offends their warped sense of values.Most of the problems of the world are, and always have been, caused by religion. Mankind will never truly be free until the black yoke of religion is lifted by the clear light of facts and reason.
at 16:37 on February 7th, 2010
i think this might be the biggest load of bullshit i have ever seen. you cant BAN websters from a SCHOOL!
at 10:29 on February 9th, 2010
I've got two words for the parent who complained...Home School! If you don't like the way the public schools are educating your child..then don't put them in a public school.No one is forcing you to enroll your child into the public school system.
at 11:02 on February 9th, 2010
I applaud these fine school officials for shielding our impressionable young people from the offensive words of the world. How are they now going to correct the damage that has been done to this poor young mind by reading these horrifyingly explicit words? Now that these offensive words have been incorporated into his vocabulary, who knows where it will end? Why he might look up other words just as offensive. Words such as rape, pillage, torture, mass murder, genital mutilation, child slavery...I could go on and on. Then he will no doubt find himself wanting to engage in sexual activity, rapine, or God only know what all. Our school officials simply MUST protect our children from exposure to these horrifying but real hazards. But how to do so? Banning this one dictionary surely won't be enough. Ban computers, encyclopedias, and all other dictionaries, too, as they will all contain offensive words. Even that won't do it. I think that it behooves our school system to take the only practical approach to protecting our young people from such horrors: when they first arrive at school in kindergarten, they should have their eyes gouged out and their eardrums punctured. Then, and ONLY then, can we be assured that they will be protected and never have to hear or read immoral or offensive words. I know that some may view that as a rather extreme approach, but it really IS the only effective method, don't you agree?
at 04:43 on February 11th, 2010
Hey, lets burn these books.No seriously, USA has to learn how to handle problems with those idiots because every time one of these stories gets to the internet, people all over the world more and more think america consists only of dumbasses and fundies. Intelligent people of USA please stand up against bullshit like this and give the world some hope.Jens from GermanyPS: we started to ban and burn books for other reasons some time ago, it didn't end well.
at 10:30 on February 11th, 2010
stupid.
at 16:22 on April 17th, 2010
So should all "offensive" words be removed from the dictionary. How about the "N" word? Should it be removed from the dictionary? I am pretty sure that most people find it offensive. What about the word bitch? Most people probably immediately thought of it in the sense of being derogatory towards women, but another meaning is a female dog. How about the word nut? It has a sexual meaning as well. I do agree with the earlier statement that children are very likely hear worse everyday. Do you monitor your kids on the internet? Have any of you though about what your children are watching on TV? How about the video games you buy your kids? Have you ever sat down with them to see what is going on in the game. Here is a good example. I am a black male and have lived in the south. I have been called "boy" several times. For those of you who don't know your history, the term boy was used by whites as a derogatory word towards blacks. I find the use of the word "boy" in this sense offensive. So by the logic presented, this "derogatory" word should be grounds to ban the dictionary and encyclopedia both. I understand that you want to protect your children. All parents do. But I feel that banning the dictionary is extreme. There are other ways that this could have been dealt with. How about asking Webster to create a "clean" version of their dictionary. Or maybe you could sit down with your child and explain to them why that is inappropriate for them. Take some responsibility for your child's education by spending time with them and not just attacking the schools when you feel you have been wronged.