NP Rank:
Michael Moore: New film premiers at festival, blasts capitalism
Moore's critique of capitalism has factual and ideological relevance in our current times of crisis.
Assuming the below quotes from Michael Moore's new documentary film, "Capitalism: A Love Story" which is slated to premier at the Venice Film Festival in September, are accurate, he is to an extent refuting the system of capitalism. Considering, though, that may of the sociology, philosophy, political science, and history department text books and professors of the University mileau of the late '60s through '70s did the same, it is logical that the ideology of capitalism might be attacked, while still adhering to the principles of democracy. A refutation of the evils of HYPER capitalism is not off the mark, IMO, and this is plainly the main thrust of Moore's critique:
Capitalism is evil. That is the conclusion U.S. documentary maker Michael Moore comes to in his latest movie "Capitalism: A Love Story," which premieres at the Venice film festival on Sunday.Blending his trademark humor with tragic individual stories, archive footage and publicity stunts, the 55-year-old launches an all out attack on the capitalist system, arguing that it benefits the rich and condemns millions to poverty.
"Capitalism is an evil, and you cannot regulate evil," the two-hour movie concludes.
"You have to eliminate it and replace it with something that is good for all people and that something is democracy."
There can be little doubt that Moore, who interviews corporate bosses who lay off thousands of workers despite healthy profit margins, and examines a group called "Condo Vultures" which descend on allegly distressed properties, gobbling them up at minimal prices, can factually allign the current financial crisis with a system which has promoted Wall Street gambling and irresponsible greed. Disliking rampant Capitalim does not preclude adhering to the founding fathers, and to the best principles of democracy.
Crowd Power
-
Blue Crush
Toronto, Canada -
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States
Recommendations (62)
-
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States -
Barry Artiste
Vancouver, Canada -
Sputnic
London, United Kingdom -
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
Karen Hatter
All Locations, Everywhere, United States
-
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Pythiian1
New York, New York, United States -
601TV
London, United Kingdom -
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States -
Edmund Jenks
Los Angeles, California, United States





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (34)
at 09:19 on September 6th, 2009
I haven't seen his other stuff but, since I am opposed to "Free Trade", and I am against "regulatory capture" where Goldmann Sachs personnel man the SEC and the FTC, I may just be in the mood for the message.
The Founding Fathers did not imagine what industrialization would do, but Jefferson wanted a more populist version with independent farmers, while Hamilton wanted a capitalist, bank-directed industrialized country.
Hamilton won out, but we should remember that we had major tariffs back then to protect our industries, making things more expensive, but allowing us an industrial base that won the Civil War and WWI and II as well.
We need to get those tariffs back and protect our jobs.
at 13:55 on September 6th, 2009
Michael Moore is a gadfly, not just of the state like Socrates was, but Moore would definitely fit into the Socratic maxim of "An unexamined life is not worth living." Moore is our 21st century examiner and delver into topics that might otherwise go unexamined using the one of the most popular and vast mediums of our time: The Film Expose Documentary.
Did the Founding Fathers imagine industrialization?
I would argue that Alexander Hamilton did have this vision. The scientific wonders of the 1760s from the first steam engine built by James Watt, hot-air ballons in the 1780s, and Eli Whitney's invention of the cotton gin and the use of interchangeable parts in the 1790s. Technology was on the march at this time in Britain especially in textiles. Britain was emgerging as an economic world leader. Hamilton as secretary treasurer celebrated the growth of American industry in a competitive spirit alongside England which was contrary to his opposition that proffered his image as being a tool of the British. His policies were consistent with the drive for trade on equal terms with England in anticipation of the industrial age.
It was Hamilton whose Federal policy of Assumption took on the debt of the states after the Revolution. The war expenses of the individual states added up to $114,000,000, compared to $37 million by the central government. In 1790, at the recommendation of first Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton, Congress combined the state debts with the foreign and domestic debts into one national debt totaling $80 million. Everyone received face value for wartime certificates, so that the national honor would be sustained and the national credit established.
Hamilton's future Industrial policy was foreshadowed in May 1790 with the appointment of Tench Coxe as assistant treasury secretary who was a well-known advocate of manufacturing and eager to raid Britain's industrial knowledge and inventions.
at 09:23 on September 6th, 2009
I have not watched him but I have read that his films have been very much "fabricated", embellished etc. It does appear he has a following.
at 09:28 on September 6th, 2009
Oh that's for sure. I remember watching a few of his films where he showed both London and Canada, and having lived in both places I was like 'that's not what it's really like'....
at 10:07 on September 6th, 2009
Thanks, Amy.
at 16:58 on September 6th, 2009
I have also lived in both places and thought yes MM you got it about right, the national health care yep spot on. Where did you live in an ivory towers?
MM all ways hits the spots that capitalist and republicans do not wish people to see, the truth hurts. I even see someone here admit they have not seen his films, looks like those that want his brilliant works of art to be hidden have won some of those highly indoctrinated in the false American capitalist dream.
Wonderful MM has done it once again and I for one can not wait to see his new film.
at 09:30 on September 6th, 2009
Look forward to watching it. Interesting claim that capitalism is evil. Capitalism could not exist without interest and interest is forbidden by God. Are the two connected by any chance ?
at 17:48 on September 6th, 2009
Interest is forbidden by the God of Islam & Christianity, NOT the God of Judaism & Deism which rule America. I don't think we all worship the same God. I'm sorry if that's offensive.
at 09:40 on September 6th, 2009
Mr. Moore seems to go for the shock values at times that just defeat whatever message he wants to say. At the end of the day, he is a filmmaker telling his story although with due respect, he is very much a capitalist himself.
at 10:12 on September 6th, 2009
Great comment.
"If I am not for myself, who am I for? If I am only for myself, what am I?"
Rabbi Hillel, I believe, and, whoever first said it:
capitalism's excesses are promoted falsely as being good for the entire system, as when the Wall Streeters push for Free Trade and expose our workers to unconscionable competition with currency manipulators such as Japan and China.
Used to be known as the old "what is good for GM is good for the US" attitude.
at 07:59 on September 7th, 2009
Right on Roy!
at 17:09 on September 6th, 2009
You can make money with out being a capitalist, a fair days work for the real amount the work is worth. Capitalism is all about making money and not caring how you make it and the more you make the more you want. Social care does not enter the equation and there is no rules that can not be broken by oiling the wheels.
at 08:02 on September 7th, 2009
Babel-Fish: Yeah! When ignoramuses such as Rush Limbaugh get paid millions for blowing hot air something doesn't add up.
at 09:42 on September 6th, 2009
I love watching Moores film, both for the comedy of inaccuracies and the smatterings of truth.
at 09:58 on September 6th, 2009
No need to try and ban them then !
at 10:09 on September 6th, 2009
He is a fabricator; ideologically, and philosophically, though, there are arguments to be made along those lines. Have not seen the film, so cannot judge it yet.
at 17:02 on September 6th, 2009
Yep the truth hurts especially dressed up in humor. Sicko was the best film so far it was spot on about national care being much better in Canada, UK, Europe and even Cuba, lol
Good old MM shock people in the USA with the truth again, got to love him for that, shame that he is so far to the left or is he?
at 10:45 on September 6th, 2009
Duuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhh! Michael Moore takes on after ... Capitalism?
Nooooooo! Say it ain't so.
Typical Michael Moore, Van Jones, Mark Lloyd, Valerie Jarrett, Howard Dean, George Soros, Barack Obama, and Progressive Politics type of stuff ... no suprises here.
at 10:48 on September 6th, 2009
Well, no---indeed, harldy surprising.........thanks for the recommend, EJ :)
at 10:57 on September 6th, 2009
SMK: I'd place more credibility in Michael Moore if he didn't profit from "capitalism" to the extent that he does. But I'll give him this: At least he comes from an American working-class background--unlike the silver-spooned anti-capitalists that never had a material want go unsatisfied.
at 13:14 on September 6th, 2009
I assume the movie tickets will be free as he does not sopport capitalism?
at 13:24 on September 6th, 2009
Well, he has benefitted off critiquing it, all the way to the bank, true.......
at 17:04 on September 6th, 2009
He deserve ever dollar... lol
at 13:58 on September 6th, 2009
Yes, Rory, I think we can grant Moore that much!
at 14:14 on September 6th, 2009
SMK: YEAH! And I admit probably a bit more . . . .but he's just so imposing and obnoxious at times . . . .
at 14:28 on September 6th, 2009
Alas, I cannot argue with that. I am not a big fan. :(
at 17:02 on September 6th, 2009
Roy, Just now saw your comments, like the Rabbi's ideas very much. Yes, truth is in it, despite all..............
at 17:16 on September 6th, 2009
And A, just recommended yours too, why did they not show up before???????????????????????????? :(
at 09:40 on September 7th, 2009
I posted in reply to Roy C's comment.
Is it better to post at the end of the thread? I usually try and respond to individuals under their comments, but if its better at the end, I will do so.
Thank you for the recommendation. : )
at 10:37 on September 7th, 2009
Oh, no, that is OK, I am just always finding on so many posts that I am told there are new comments. I go look, and none are there. Then hours later, they show up. :( And I am very frustrated as each time I go to reply to a post or a PM, it tells me I am spam and have to do the code, and it is slowing me down and driving me crazy....:( sorry...........:(