The new Vancouver Special, now with more awkwardness

by Rob Peters | July 1, 2008 at 09:31 am
468 views | 2 Recommendations | 4 comments

Here's a cantankerous piece about a new Vancouver housing trend: the Mohawk. If you're from these parts you've probably seen them around--"a two-storey box with a half-sized strip of 'hair' on top," as the writer describes them.

The Mohawk is arguably more attractive than its more famous cousin, the Vancouver Special, but infinitely more awkward for useful interior design, apparently.

There's been a lot of positive press about Vancouver's urban design (see 'Vancouverism'), so maybe this is a good dose of reality to temper the hype.

"When it comes to city planning and design itself, I do believe we are world-class," stated City of Vancouver planning director Brent Toderian in a recent article.

If true, how to explain the Mohawk?

That's what some are calling the latest Vancouver housing form, an evolution of the Vancouver Special that is rapidly peppering neighbourhoods all over East Vancouver (much like its predecessor had done in the 70s and 80s).

Although most don't know the Mohawk by name, you will find them along major Eastside arterials or bikeways -- Knight, Nanaimo, Renfrew, Rupert. They are very hard to miss: a two-storey box with a half-sized strip of "hair" on top.

Having heard all types of remarks by dumbfounded observers as to what they were all about (my favorite being a couple who thought it may have been the newest style of the avant-garde), the unfortunate truth is that it is largely created by the City of Vancouver's own planning regulations.

More specifically, the Mohawk is a result of the peculiar interaction between allowable floor area, the two-and-a-half storey height restriction, and a sneaky requirement that states that any air space above 12ft in height counts towards one's floor area (discouraging open mezzanines along with the large roofs of local heritage homes that give these endearing homes their human scale).
Although it may be considered more physically attractive than the Special, its awkward and unforgiving interior layout -- bisected by stairs and load-bearing walls – makes this home exceedingly difficult to change in accordance to the dynamic needs of its inhabitants.

The delusions that seem to have resulted from the many books and articles that have been written describing Vancouver's urban achievements are becoming increasingly dangerous. Have we done good things in the fields of urbanism and planning? Definitely. Should we be proud of how far the city has come to date? Undisputedly. But the neighbourhoods in which most Vancouverites live, work, and play -- far from the heavily touristed million-dollar towers of the downtown core -- leave much to be desired in terms of both planning and design.

As the proliferation of the Mohawk demonstrates, these areas are home to some of the worst city planning decisions yet. Ones that promise to be around for a while to come because discussion of how to make these places better has been overshadowed by a few extraordinary examples.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
mtippett

You can also check out vancouverspecial.com.

jayp
jayp
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 11:31 on July 1st, 2008

Rob Peters, I like this story. It's good stuff. Any pictures out there of this variant on the "Mohawk"? By the description, this sounds like another reason to replace the city council in the next election.

0
eastvanray

Nice try but no cigar.  City council does not originate these by-laws.  They are the product of the staff at the Vancouver Planning Department.  If it becomes an issue then council may act to ask staff to reccomend changes.

0
JeffHuang

The special looks horrible already. What does the mohawk look like anyways.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from