No Muslim Accommodation? Stupidity Reigns Supreme!

by Barry Artiste | November 20, 2007 at 06:51 am
898 views | 0 Recommendations | 5 comments

Photos

Garda Security, What's next a Swimsuit Competition for Employees?

Garda Security, What's next a Swimsuit Competition for Employees?

see larger image

uploaded by Barry Artiste

Opinion

Barry Artiste, Now Public Contributor

A Hijab being banned from polling booths at voting time I can agree with, but Airport Security Company to suspending an employee from the workplace who happens to be a  Muslim  woman, a single working mother trying to eke out a living the best she can.

Her only crime? Wearing a skirt longer than regulation smacks of complete and utter idiocy on behalf of Garda Security.  

I believe in restricting reasonable accomodation for cultures in some cases such as implementing sharia laws and other cultural mores which go against the laws of this country but to suspend a woman for wearing a longer skirt  smacks of inane stupidity.

My Final Thought
My Christmas wish for this Muslim woman is a Lawsuit Payout  which will rival a 6/49 win.

TORONTO - An observant Muslim woman has been suspended without pay from her job screening passengers and baggage at Toronto's Pearson International Airport since August over an extra 12 inches of navy blue fabric added to the skirt of her uniform out of religious conviction.

Halima Muse, 33, felt the standard-issue knee-length skirt was not modest enough. So after five years of being ill-at-ease working in slacks, she made herself an ankle-length skirt out of nearly identical material and wore it for almost seven months before catching the eye of an operations manager.

On Aug. 11, Ms. Muse was sent home and has not been allowed to return to the job she held for almost six years with the private security firm Garda, X-raying hand luggage and waving a metal detector over travellers. Garda is contracted by the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority (CATSA).

p>Yesterday she filed a complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission alleging discrimination.

 

"I practice my religion and I have to wear a skirt because it's a religious issue," Ms. Muse said. "It's not that I like it. I have to--it's my religion."

Ms. Muse, a single mother of a 14-year-old son, does not understand why thepermission she is seeking is such a big deal when some of her colleagues hem their skirts shorter, and such religious garb as turbans, kippas and headscarves is permitted as part of the uniform.

Ms. Muse's union and the Canadian Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIRCAN) are also perplexed. Both groups are supporting Ms. Muse's fight.

Ed Hawrysh, a trustee with the Teamsters local 847, said the union filed a grievance with Garda, but CATSA determines uniform policy.

"Look at the RCMP," Mr. Hawrysh said. "If the national police force can accommodate that type of religious belief, I can't understand why CATSA can't do something even simpler. We're talking about a skirt. This is an issue in CATSA where they've made a decision and they're not prepared to move -- right, wrong or otherwise. I think it's totally ridiculous."

James Robbins, Ms. Muse's lawyer, said the courts have repeatedly ruled in favour of accommodating minority religious rights, as long as the concession is reasonable and does not constitute an undue hardship for others.

"It's seems pretty reasonable to let the poor woman lower her hemline a few inches," he said. "The accommodation she's looking for is trivial from CATSA's perspective."

Garda, the private security firm, says it was just enforcing CATSA's rules in suspending Ms. Muse, and even approached the agency to find out if it would make an allowance for her longer skirt.

"What they came back with was that they felt that the current policy they had with those alternatives addressed the concern that she had, and so for that reason they were not making a change to the policy for a longer skirt length," Garda spokesman Joe Gavaghan said. "The situation we find ourselves in is that when you have a contract with a customer, which is what CATSA is, you have to fulfill the requirements that they set forth."

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
René

What do they she's hiding under that skirt?

0
René

Sounds like sexism to me. Show more leg!

0
Barry Artiste

I know Rene, utter stupidity, I guess they want plunging necklines for the women  and plumbers crack for the men too.

0
sammm

I dont wanna look mean or anything... but even if the reporter is rubbing the part that shes single mother in,  I dont feel bad a for a second. Seriously... is there anybody from other religions who complains about this sorts of thing and puts it out all over the news? No... They always find a dumb ass reason to get on the news. Ifs its not the scarf, its the skirt.. soon its gonna be the shoes... they ll want to wear slippers to some place where you need steel toe boots... and if they get in trouble they ll run to the news and say that its their religion....  riiight.

0
Sammm

I work at the airport at the same company as she does...just not the same city. If you only roll up your sleeves or even open one too many of your shirt buttons wearing summer dress, you get a warning.. I dont see anybody complaining to the news about it. Funniest part is, lets say a muslim woman passes through the x-ray with the ninja type scarf and the alarm doesnt go off... nobody is gonna search her! Im not being discriminative about muslims... but who else wears a scarf? Just as an example, c-4 doesn t contain any metal.. So if little lady decides to sneak in some c-4 under that hood of hers, who se gonna stop her since it wont set off the alarm?!I personally think airport security should be stricker.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from