NP Rank:
Obama to Address the Nation's schoolchildren
From ED.gov :
Below is an excerpt from a letter sent to school Principals accross the nation from the Education Secretary, telling of the President's upcoming address on Tuesday , Sep. 8 to school aged children of the U.S..
Of course, many in the blogosphere are already alarmed at the state-maternalistic tone of some of the suggestions for grades 1-7 and on through 12, which entail students discussing excerpts from Obama's speeches, and critiquing what needs to be on his agenda for the future of education. I would assume the community spirit hearkens a bit back to a general government consensus. I can sympathize to a degree.
Notwithstanding, the comments I have read that W. Bush would not have gotten away with this sort of thing do not fully ring true, as his post 9-11 addresses to students and parents had the patriotism of the state tone as well.
This is the first time an American president has spoken directly to the nation's school children about persisting and succeeding in school. We encourage you to use this historic moment to help your students get focused and begin the school year strong. I encourage you, your teachers, and students to join me in watching the President deliver this address on Tuesday, September 8, 2009. It will be broadcast live on the White House websitewww.whitehouse.gov 12:00 noon eastern standard time.In advance of this address, we would like to share the following resources: a menu of classroom activities for students in grades preK-6 and for students in grades 7-12. These are ideas developed by and for teachers to help engage students and stimulate discussion on the importance of education in their lives. We are also staging a student video contest on education. Details of the video contest will be available on our website www.ed.gov in the coming weeks.
On behalf of all Americans, I want to thank our educators who do society's most important work by preparing our children for work and for life. No other task is more critical to our economic future and our social progress. I look forward to working with you in the months and years ahead to continue improving the quality of public education we provide all of our children.
Sincerely,
Arne Duncan
Source
Here is a very interesting refutaion - moreso, a polite voicing of concerns - from the perspective of a Catholic:
In my opinion, one of the great dangers of a liberal democracy (something emphasized by Tocqueville, among others) is a tendency toward a maternal state, a tendency that has been around in the U.S. for quite some time, arguably dating back to Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, if not further. This leads, slowly if not always directly, to an implicit or explicit belief that the State 1) possesses a sort of sacred place in the life of citizens, 2) is theprimary educator and teacher of both children and adults, and 3) should use education and appeals to civic responsibilities in order to grow in size and influence. All of this is very problematic from a Catholic perspective, regardless of how negative, ambivalent, or positive you might be about public education.
It may well be that President Obama's speech will be non-offensive in content, containing exhortations to studying hard, being diligent, setting goals, and so forth. Fine. My issue with the speech, which I didn't make clearly enough above, is not so much with the content (although I'm very curious about what he will say), but the bothersome notion, which is hard to avoid, that the President of the United States is somehow Educator-in-Chief, or even Father-Figure-in-Chief. The fact is, public schools have been, for many decades now, run by a largely centralized, federal system; the direct influence of parents and communities in their local schools does vary from place to place, but it is impossible to deny the increased, often blatant, centralization of the system. This raises serious questions about a host of matters, including (but not limited to) the principles of subsidiarity and solidarity, as well as the role of parents as primary educators of their children, a role that isn't distinctively Catholic in the least.
To put it simply, this speech, in my opinion, may well mark another small but sure step (symbolic, perhaps, but still substantial) toward what Pope Benedict has described as "The State which would provide everything, absorbing everything into itself ... a State which regulates and controls everything." I could be completely wrong. I'm certainly interested in arguments to the contrary.
Source: http://insightscoop.typepad.com/2004/2009/09/reason-5985900-why-i-keep-my-kids-out-of-public-schools.html
Crowd Power
-
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (9)
at 11:24 on September 2nd, 2009
This is a great way for children to begin to understand that government is working for them. The person lodging the response opinion purports to "raise a host of questions" is missing the point.
The Refutation
Public education is a hierarchy consisting of federal, state, county, and municipal school districts. Local school boards working in concert with administrators, teachers, and parents form policy, and state boards of education form curriculum.
The refuter states there has been blatant centralization by the federal government, but does not cite any examples.
Yes, the federal government has specific laws for public education:
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
The protections of these is as follows:
Age descrimination in employment act covers educators and employees from descrimination on the basis of age.
Equal Access Act covers speech and assembly for students who meet on school grounds during non-instructional time if a limited forum as been created by the school
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act covers student and parent access to school records and parent right to request modification of them and applies to student records and teacher recommendations
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act covers descrimination against students with disabilities who receive special education and applies to education and related services for disabled students.
Sect 504 of the Rhabilitation Acto of 1973 covers descrimination against disabled indivudals and to employment and educational issues
Title Vll of the Civil Right Act of 1964 covers descrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin in employment issues including affirmative action and harassment
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 covers descrimination on the basis of sex in student issues including athletics and harassment.
Which one of these U.S. Department of Education laws would the writer like to have revoked as the speaker for all Caltholics?
at 11:59 on September 2nd, 2009
Thanks, A, for providing this additional information.
at 12:21 on September 2nd, 2009
Always my pleasure to contribute : )
at 12:40 on September 2nd, 2009
Wow, you are an excellent researcher of material, A! And you set forth a refutation of the refutation! We need to refute the refuters. I agree with Karen: Great job!
at 12:58 on September 2nd, 2009
Thank you so much for the kind words. btw: The refuter did not back up anything he said except the quote from the Pope, and that might have been taken out of context.
And dragging in Alexis de Tocqueville, well, that was good because Tocqueville did say some positive things about Catholism. But he argued both ways for centralization and decentralization. I think he was covering his bases. LOL. But he did admit that the American experiment was still evolving.
Tocqueville remarks in Democracy in America: "The men who live in the democratic ages upon which we are entering have naturally a taste for independence; they are naturally impatient of regulation, and they are wearied by the permanence even of the condition they themselves prefer. They are fond of power; but they are prone to despise and hate those who wield it, and they easily elude its grasp by their own mobility and insignificance."
at 13:06 on September 2nd, 2009
Well, well spoken! You sure do have the touch of the pen ( or the keyboard)---right on the money. Yes, that was a sneaky bit, Tocqueville, stopped me in my tracks, but you have uncovered the dualistic nature of the argument. Good going. ;)
at 17:36 on September 2nd, 2009
Thanks for this, smkovalinsky. I'll just repeat my comment left at Rory Cripps' story: Personally, I think the President is addressing the wrong group. President Obama and/or U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan should be sending a message to the nation's "school officials" on how to provide a Safe Learning Environment. One in which ALL children can learn.
at 17:40 on September 2nd, 2009
That is true, Rhonda, and that's right; it is they who need most to be addressed. Thanks for the link! :)
at 17:44 on September 2nd, 2009
You are most welcome, smkovalinsky!