Obama on DOMA , gay marriage: Rejecting MA lawsuits

by Susan Marie Kovalinsky | September 18, 2009 at 11:59 am
341 views | 18 Recommendations | 1 comment

Photos

Loading photos...

One can only wonder if today's ruling will impact  gay community opinion on the  Obama administration  in a negative way.   The GLBT community may have thought Obama would take a radical stance on these issues,  but most are now enlightened on that score.  

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration on Friday urged a U.S. court to dismiss a lawsuit by gay married couples from Massachusetts who say they were unlawfully denied federal marriage benefits.

President Barack Obama won strong support from gays during his presidential campaign and has pressed for repealing the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act that bars the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages.

But the gay community has been angered by the Obama administration's defense of the law in court proceedings. Justice Department officials say they are obligated to defend federal statutes when they are challenged.

"In making this filing, the department is bound by the only precedent that exists, which is that no court has found such a right to federal benefits based upon marital status to be constitutionally required," said Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler.

The filing in the U.S. Court for the District of Massachusetts "points out the administration's position that Congress should extend federal benefits to spouses in same-sex marriages," she said.

Massachusetts was the first state to legalize same-sex marriages but those couples cannot access federal protections and programs granted to heterosexual married couples, prompting legal challenges.

The lawsuit, filed on behalf of seven same-sex couples and three survivors of same-sex spouses, says it is unconstitutional to bar them from enrolling in federal healthcare programs, receiving certain retirement and survivor benefits and filing joint income tax returns.

"No court has found such a right to federal benefits to be fundamental -- and the federal courts that have considered the question in the context of DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act) itself have rejected such a claim," the Justice Department said in the filing.

The department urged that the lawsuits be dismissed because their claims either were without merit or the individuals did not have a legal right to sue.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
3
77

Why do you call this site a community if it is clearly a dictatorship? I am not those other people and I am having a hard time trying to understand why you would accuse me of doing such a thing. You obvisouly have too much power. You deleted all of my comments as well as those of the other people and I won't deal with censorship. I have no problem finding a site that appreciates my opinion. Apparently, this isn't one of those sites. You have been corrupted by power and I simply won't be apart of it. If you didn't want me to post my opinion, you could have just told me instead of deleting all of my comments. Goodbye, Now Public. I hope you do not treat anyone else in this manner.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from