is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
About 150 people rallied in Vancouver on Tuesday, protesting the decision to stop funding the CBC Radio Orchestra.The orchestra will cease to exist at the end of the fall concert season in November.
The rally started in front of the Queen Elizabeth Theatre, moved around the block and ended in front of the CBC building.
Several of the protesters were University of British Columbia music students whose classes were cancelled so they could attend the rally.
The orchestra was formed in 1938 when radio orchestras were popular and is the last of its kind in North America. The decision to disband it was a matter of economics, Jennifer McGuire, executive director of CBC English Radio, said in an interview last week.
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (8)
at 16:02 on April 3rd, 2008
A little self-interested it seems. Music students wanting to keep this gig going long enough for them to get in on the tax dollars. Get rid of it! How many "private" orchestras do we have in Vancouver? Are they not good enough to be broadcast by the CBC?
at 17:53 on April 3rd, 2008
Why do people suddenly start barking about artists working for so-called "tax dollars" whenever a story like this comes up? You don't start moaning when a medical student gets a job at a hospital, or a law student gets a job at the courts. I could go on and on about how many jobs are ultimately paid by tax dollars. The CBC belongs to Canadians, and Canadians work there. Musicians work for the orchestra, and this particular orchestra played a great deal of music by Canadian composers, who are working to contribute to Canadian culture. Simple. This argument about tax dollars is just naive.
And it's entirely inaccurate to think that this was a rally of music students. Only a handful of students were there. Most were music industry professionals and educators.
at 00:28 on April 6th, 2008
Sign the Petition to save CBC Radio Orchestra:
SaveCBCRadioOrchestra.com
CBC Radio ended this orchestra with the stroke of a pen, with no consultation with Canadian taxpayers who fund the CBC, paying the CBC to uphold its mandate of providing and supporting uniquely Canadian programming. What could be more unique than this important ensemble of Canada’s most talented musicians?
If we allow this significant Canadian institution to be dissolved, one day we may be wondering where all the orchestras have gone, where all the dancers, singers, and artists have gone. I don’t want that Canada. If all that is left of Canadian culture is that which is saleable or marketable or easy, we are not in a country, we are in a shopping mall.
Save this orchestra. Our Canadian culture depends on it.
Tom S
at 13:17 on April 7th, 2008
"Save this orchestra. Our Canadian culture depends on it." Talk about hyperbole! Are you serious? Do you honestly believe that the existence of Canadian culture depends on the existence of an government funded orchestra? If so you must have a very low opinion of Canadian artists and audiences alike.
Canadian culture is alive and well. Just because very few people do not want to listen to the CBC orchestra (check the ratings) does not equate to the demise of our culture. It means that orchestral music is not a significant player in defining what Canadians want in their cultural experiences. We had unique culture before the CBC orchestra and we will have unique culture after it.
at 23:17 on April 7th, 2008
Yup. Seriously. Our culture is made from all of its constituent parts. If they are dissolved one at a time, without a hiccup, then there will be none. Thi orchestra has historical signifance, is world-renown, and functions to serve a mandate of showcasing Canada's finest in that realm. You should be proud that Canada has such an institution.
If we keep only that which is saleable, marketable, or easy, the we don't live in a country, we live in a shopping mall.
at 13:29 on April 9th, 2008
The end of a single taxpayer funded orchestra does not equate to the dissolution of Canadian culture. Why is it that we can rely on the market to produce such important things as the food we eat, the clothes we wear and the homes in which we live but somehow the arts cannot be produced by the same means? And what is wrong with democracy? What is wrong with the culture that people are willing to pay for? Why is it that it seems to be a badge of honour for some that they produce "culture" so unpopular that it requires tax money to survive? If it is not good enough for people to want to pay for then it is not worth my hard earned tax dollars.
at 21:49 on April 12th, 2008
So you say.
I say: if we allow the government to dissolve enough our cultural heritage, one piece at a time, without any protest, we'll be left with one very banal country. All arts cannot be produced by "commercial market" forces. Most arts culture never has been supported that way. The Renaissance happened because of the patronage of the Medici family, who were not only wealthy, by most measurements a political force and governing power. In the new world, governments are the patrons of arts culture (whether you care for it or not). Your popularity argument is meaningless. The orchestra is important to millions of Canadians and important to the country's up-and-coming musicians and composers. It has a legacy that was nurtured for 70 years and still has relevance. By your argument, the sign of quality or worth is when something has "commercial" value or is popular with the masses. There is far more to our society than record sales. Who told you CBC Orchestra and Radio 2 are not popular? You might not listen to it, but millions of Canadians do.
10,000 names on a petition with no national attention. 1000 names a day. 10 days in. More than a few people are angry. It may be that millions don't take to the streets, but that's people. Easier to sign a petition or write a letter, and thousands are.
So we disagree. Oh well. Nice arguing with you, Eastvanray. If you don't want to support non-commercial arts culture, that's okay by me.
At least it was intelligent argument.
Tomasz.
at 19:27 on April 13th, 2008
I would be absolutely shocked if millions of Canadians listen to any given broadcast of the CBC Orchestra. It would make that broadcast the most listened to in the country; and it is not. I might believe that tens of thousands....but millions? Not buying it, show me your source.
As for the government being the new Medicis. That is only true because the government taxes us to death and average working people have no money left to support the culture they enjoy. In the US where taxes are lower private support for the arts is HUGE! Are they more cultured than Canadians? I doubt it. They have more disposable income. The best system is one that leaves enough money for the real patrons (Canadian culture lovers and supportive corporations) to support what they love. Not one where bureaucrats in Ottawa decide for us what culture is worthy of our hard earned dollars.
Imagine if we applied the government model to other choices we make of what to consume (financially support)? How about government supporting chefs and subsidizing restaurants with tax dollars? Wine, beer and spirit makers? Clothing designers? Why? Because these things are considered matters of personal taste….just like music. I don’t want my tax dollars going to the CBC Orchestra any more than I want it subsidizing Nickleback, Diana Krall or Rita McNeil.
For the record I attend and support a variety of cultural institutions including the Vancouver Playhouse, the VSO, the Vancouver Art Gallery, the Fringe Fest, the Vancouver Film Fest, the Jazz Fest, the Comedy Fest, Bard on the Beach and numerous others so I am a supporter of culture; just not a supporter of sacred cows and hyperbole.