'Public Intellectuals 2.0': Democratizing Free Speech?

by Jarrett Martineau | July 1, 2008 at 04:48 pm
455 views | 10 Recommendations | 2 comments

Photos

Mesa de periodismo ciudadano

Mesa de periodismo ciudadano

see larger image

uploaded by morrissey

OpenDemocracy has a great post today by Evgeny Morozov on the recent Citizen Media Summit (organized by our citizen-media internet neighbours Global Voices), which was held this past weekend in Budapest. The post and the summit raise important questions about the nature of free speech and democratized media, at a time when citizen-driven, or crowd-powered, media have facilitated the proliferation of blogging and citizen reporting around the world.

As Morozov accurately notes, not only has the exponential growth of the blogosphere led to ever-more online, micro-celebrity news feeding frenzies, it has also enabled a new generation of "public intellectuals" to emerge and establish themselves as a vital part of the global news media. And yet, just as these new voices emerge, many oppressive government regimes are cracking down on dissidents with ever-incresing ferocity.

Should bloggers be granted the same freedoms, rights and protections afforded to traditional journalists and reporters? If we are to acknowledge the critical role that citizen media play in redefining the news as we have known it, then we must endeavour to protect the  ability for these emergent, global voices to be heard, disseminated and, most importantly, protected.

Many of the bloggers who gathered on 27-28 June 2008 in Budapest, Hungary for a Citizen Media Summit organised by Global Voices Online had at first glance an unlikely appearance. These representatives of a growing worldwide network of citizen journalists and digital activists looked rather studious, a touch morose, even - to many bloggers themselves a key marker of social distinction - uncool.

Moreover, these idealistic people did not talk much about gadgets, fashion, or campaign-financing; nor rush to praise or scorn Barack Obama or John McCain; nor fret over the latest celebrity-hunt or political trick in the style of Gawker or the Huffington Post. Instead, they got into heated discussions (often in heavily accented English) over a different set of topics: internet filtering, human-rights violations, and the future of freedom of expression.

This, then, was a different kind of blogger and a different order of reality. The background of many of the participants told the story: for in their countries of origin many at the Budapest gathering sustain their blogs in face of the threat or reality of arrest, intimidation and beating from the authorities. Their enemies are real, not imaginary. Their blogs are exercises in courage.

Some of the Global Voices bloggers based in the middle east, for example, were not able to travel to the conference because of their previous association with the organisation; others might face trouble on their return home. Yet they are willing - even eager - to take the risk of putting the problems of their countries and communities on the global agenda.

The sheer diversity of countries represented at the Budapest summit - with bloggers from places as diverse as Mauritania, Colombia, Bangladesh and Tajikistan - suggests that the phenomenon they represent is indeed genuinely global. Even in places with low internet penetration, blogs can still have a significant impact in creating channels to voice dissent and influence wider media networks. Kenyan bloggers, for example, have built synergistic relationships with the country's radio journalists, who have come to rely on blogs for materials for their programmes, thus making blogs accessible (albeit indirectly) to virtually anyone in the country.

The Budapest gathering represents one of the major benefits of today's internet revolution: the radical democratisation of the global flow of ideas. The technology, the ideas and the processes that have made possible blogs, social networks, and collaborative projects like Wikipedia also give many unconventional thinkers previously consigned to the margins of public life a platform that enables them to be heard by a dedicated (if often tiny) audience. The academic, blogger and pundit Daniel W Drezner has called this new generation - free from the usual constraints of the academia, self-employed, and armed with Google search - "Public Intellectuals 2.0".

Today, the greatest threat to freedom of expression online is not web censorship but mistreatment of bloggers. This trend again connects bloggers both with their antecedents in the communist-era dissident movements and their fellow-citizens living under authoritarian rule. In facing the threat, many bloggers share the same complex of emotions and reactions (including fears, doubts, and the self-censorship that often follows) that haunts other citizens. This reality was reflected in a recurrent theme of the Budapest conference: "bloggers are not aliens".

Amid the clear and present danger to bloggers' civil and human rights, the need to defend their voice and the phenomenon of open-access media they personify is vital. The Citizen Media Summit raised the idea that the equivalent of the Reporters without Borders group - a "Bloggers without Borders" - might be created to lobby for bloggers' release from jail and right to speak freely. But would bloggers get the same protection as journalists and political prisoners; could traditional groups expand their role and make such a new organisation unnecessary? Such are the questions that western governments and many traditional human-rights organisations - as well as bloggers themselves - must answer as soon as possible.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 17:17 on July 1st, 2008

Jarrett Martineau, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Maireid Sullivan
Maireid Sullivan
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 23:16 on July 1st, 2008

Jarrett Martineau, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Your introduction is particularly brilliant! ...intelligent commentary that 'rationalizes' the need for freedom of the press is called for - as we write. :)

It reminds me of the founder of NowPublic.com's recent comment, to paraphrase; those who have invested a life-time in multi-level observing and chronicling will become news "DJ" as the internet develops. Sounds like fun to me. ...but we have a lot of 'un-doing' to do before we fulfill the promises of Freedom and Democracy.


This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from