NP Rank:
Saddam Dead or Another Lie ?
The International Institute of Nonviolence.
By Rev. Jermano:
Opinion :
Is anyone interested in an Indian Jones adventure in looting Saddams grave? Everything else is lootable in Iraq. But then again maybe Saddam really isn't dead. We don’t know for sure. All we saw was a noose around his neck, from a cell phone video tape. Why wouldn't they have a real news footage video of the execution with a decent camera showing it? They were gracious enough to do so with Timothy McVeigh, handcuffs and all. But people even claim McVeigh isn't dead either.
Bush lied about going to war, and I wage they lied about his execution. Why would they kill the guy who would have first hand knowledge to where all those Weapons of Mass Destruction are located?
If Saddam was dead Bush would have his head mounted on the wall in the White House wouldn't he? Wouldn't his execution bring a lot of money to the Main Stream Media by the public? BBC, NBC, ABC and CBS would have had exclusive rights to the footage, yet some off the wall cell phone company has the video?Does that make sense? They were killing his lawyers, and no footage of that came about. We are suppose to believe this nonsense fed to us?
I don't know about you but I have seen a lot of western movies with guys hanging at the end, and in real life they cut down the actor so he can have a swinging good time at some nightclub afterwards. Hang-em-High was one notable flick. In fact I remember they had stand-in actors in Iraq who looked exactly like Saddam who could have been the stuntmen to pull off a fake Saddam execution. Just like the fake Osama binLadin videos. So where is he buried? No funeral video with Arabian horses pulling the wagon right?
Anyone think that is why America is not pulling out of Iraq, because really Saddam is not dead, and the Iraqi Government is threatening to tell the truth if the US pulls out.
Killing Saddam would have been a pretty dumb thing don't you think? Don't you think Bushies CIA would want to know what Saddam did with the nuclear plans he had? Did he make copies and send to Iran, to Syria, to Libya, even though Libya renounced its program doesn't mean they are not out to make someone else a benefactor. What if binLadin already has the plans, and is now just working out the construction phase somewhere, perhaps in Iran, or perhaps in Saudi Arabia, or Egypt, or with Hamas right next door to Israel?
If Bushy is holding potential terrorists in secret locations throughout the world to include Guantanamo without trials; why wouldn't they do it with Saddam? Saddam is certainly a storehouse full of information about terrorism activity Bushy claims, so why kill him? Wouldn't he be better alive in trying to gain information about potential plans in attacking Israel? And what are his connections to Hamas, in Syria, and to really Iran, when he finally decided to end the War in Iran and bit back at the US who was using him to fight their war? Does Bushy really think terrorists are going to believe Saddam is dead? They know darn well the US would not kill the top dog, because if they did there would be even more violence than there is now. The troop surge is a cover for the fact Saddam is still really alive.
Are we that dumb to think he is dead?
What other reasons are there to why Bushy won't leave Iraq? Obviously the no soldier will die in vain diatribe, but perhaps with Saddam dead but really alive they have to stay in Iraq because if the people in Iraq found out Saddam was alive like we found out about the torture video's; and the US pulled out; the Bath party would reorganize and more trouble will erupt. Bushy is holding him somewhere until they break through using torture on him, and he tells them about where those WMD are. But Georges mother Barbara always tells George you can catch more flies with honey than with a swatter, so maybe they aren't torturing him.
People who think they killed him, so he couldn't testify about WMD being sold to him, are wrong because who cares what he might testify, everyone in the US knows the USA supplied Saddam with Chemical Weapons. Dead men don't tell lies. But live ones can tell truth? In fact the truth is they gave Saddam the weapons to fight not only Iran, but also Muslims they thought were connected to binLadin in Iraq. They wanted him to use the weapons. Most of the people Saddam killed were Muslims right? Does this make any sense to why we are on the same Muslim crusade and march to the trenches Saddam was filling? The fake execution of Saddam they thought would usher in less violence but now they see it isn't working. In fact it has backfired and more violence is erupting. They certainly don't want to tell the world now he is alive, God forbid.
But if he is really dead....isn't it more evidence against Bush to his incompetence and lunacy? It's OK to hold terrorist suspects who are not the main leaders or organizers and keep them alive and torture them, but it’s better to kill the head king pin, the big rooster, the main boss who knows everything about the terrorism plans going on in the world right?
I don't think he is dead, or ole Bushy really is a dumb-vamp-bat.
News Tools
April 9, 2008 at 10:22 am by djermano, 610 views, 7 comments






Add a comment
Comments (7)
at 12:48 on April 9th, 2008
actual matter of the subject line aside, i thoroughly enjoyed your line or arguments and conclusions.
thank you for a good laugh :)
at 16:51 on April 10th, 2008
Where have you been? Wouldn't be the least surprised. But why hasn't this come up sooner? djermano, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 20:29 on April 10th, 2008
Hi Rene, your question to why it hasn't come up sooner is case in point to the deception. Big Media not going after the story? It was bigger than the Statue toppling of Saddam. It makes no sense to think he is dead. It would be careless to have him executed. The idea his death would bring creditability to the US in stopping terrorism is highly flawed. His capture and interrogation could have been used to stop the violence and future violence . Executing terrorists creates more terrorists in my opinion, capturing and imprisoning them has more deterring results. Now that they claim he is dead, it really throws a wrench in their rendition camps in holding suspects without trials. Why hold minions and keep them alive over the lie of suspected terror, when they have no information? Clearly when they executed the top dog who did have all the information, proves they are not after stopping terrorism, but actually committing terrorism instead. Thanks for your comment.
at 03:03 on April 25th, 2008
There is a video tape of Sadaam being exicuted. American media typically does not show this type of video on American telivison.
Saddaam was interviewed for almost 9 months from a CIA agent This story appeared on one of the American magazine shows like 60 minutes or 20/20.
at 07:45 on April 26th, 2008
Polisite of course there is a video; made from a cell phone copy. And so who really watches Television anymore, when most of the News is in the internet. I have seen more graphic death from Iraq on the internet than I remember seeing from Vietnams War. Saddam was interviewed for 9 months and he was the big fish, yet Bush has been holding lackeys who he suspects are terrorists for a number of years. And so you are suggesting that 60 minutes and 20/20 are a legitimate news source? They certainly don't ask the real questions, nor do they support the objectives to not using war as a means to political goals. There has been more terror after the War on terror that is now reaching it's 7th year, than the amount of terror that gave Bush the idea he needed to wage a war on it. I find the lynching of Saddam unclear and really an ignorant move by Bush and his Generals in Iraq.
at 20:29 on May 8th, 2008
You keep criticizing Bush and the handling of this "execution," but it wasn't up to him. Hell, he criticized the way his rushed execution was carried out, and so did many others. I mean, it doesn't matter what I say, because I'm sure you could come up with some counter-conspiracy theory for any point I make, but I'm just saying...
Also, it's easy to be pessimistic about MSM, but do you realize how many thousands of journalists across the world would kill to break a story like this? It'd make their career. Remarkable that you've managed to beat them all to it.
at 20:19 on May 9th, 2008
Drew it was up to him. The US military captured him. Bush is a showboat clown, that hides truth in order to protect himself from crimes being exposed he committed. He wanted Saddam dead, and supported the execution claims.
They could have flown him out of the country. But what did they do? They kept him in Iraq, with a phony trial. Notice how the executioners had hoods over their faces! And then to claim they captured footage on a measly cell phone video camera leaving out MSM to cover the story is highly questionable and a good case that it was staged.
The other part of the argument is that Saddam the terrorist king who would know more about future terrorist plots, is executed while America holds suspects who know nothing; for years and years; is really ignorant on their part.