NP Rank:
San Francisco federal judge: Prop 8 must release records
A federal judge in San Francisco has ruled that Proposition 8 sponsors must release records to lawyers seeking to overturn the gay marriage ban.
The ruling asserts that confidential communications may reveal the true logic which was used in the Proposition, and the rationale may have been simple bigotry or hostility, which would go against constitutional rights to equality.
The sponsors of California's same-sex marriage ban must hand over some internal campaign records to lawyers seeking to overturn the voter-enacted initiative, a federal judge in San Francisco ruled Thursday.
Denying a request to shield the information, U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn Walker said the Protect Marriage campaign had failed to show that providing private e-mails, memos and reports would inhibit the political activities of gay marriage opponents or subject them to unbridled harassment.
The judge agreed with lawyers for two unmarried same-sex couples who have sued to strike down the ban, known as Proposition 8, that confidential communications between the campaign's leaders and professional consultants could reveal a rationale for denying gays the right to wed that is relevant to the case.
The lawsuit argues that the measure was motivated by hostility toward gays and as such must be struck down as inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of equality.
"What was decided not to be said in a political campaign may cast light on what was actually said," Walker said.
At the same time, the judge said the couples' lawyers must limit their fact-finding request to cover only central issues and individuals, including Mormon and Catholic church representatives who served on the executive committee that oversaw the campaign. He also left open the possibility that he would restrict public access to the documents.
Crowd Power
-
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States
Recommendations (16)
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States -
Hugh Askew
Omaha, Nebraska, United States






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 09:56 on October 4th, 2009
Well, if this isn't a ruling from a totalitarian regime...or it's lackies, what is.
U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn Walker said the Protect Marriage campaign had failed to show that providing private e-mails, memos and reports would inhibit the political activities of gay marriage opponents or subject them to unbridled harassment.
....................confidential communications between the campaign's leaders and professional consultants could reveal a rationale for denying gays the right to wed that is relevant to the case.
if then someone proves that Obamacare is based on the premise that Barack hates capitalism, would that make it unconstitutional?
at 10:54 on October 4th, 2009
Really a bad, bad decision.
Why I feel that California has gone to hell, and maybe even why it deserves to be there. That is just inquisitional. Period.
Look, legality is not morality. Reasons for doing something in the committee don't begin to address the why and wherefore of the vote banning gay marriage by the general populace, with overwhelming support among blacks and Asians, strong support among Hispanics and lukewarm support for whites.
The decision is virtually an act of psychosis by the judge.