San Francisco federal judge: Prop 8 must release records

by smkovalinsky | October 3, 2009 at 10:46 pm
87 views | 16 Recommendations | 2 comments

Videos

Ask A Gay Family Ep_ 6 What If ?

see larger video

sourced by smkovalinsky

Ask A Gay Family Ep_ 6  What If ?

Photos

San Francisco federal judge:  Prop 8 must release records

San Francisco federal judge: Prop 8 must release records

see larger image

uploaded by smkovalinsky

A federal judge in San Francisco has ruled that Proposition 8 sponsors must release records to lawyers seeking to overturn the gay marriage ban.


The ruling asserts that confidential communications may reveal the true logic which was used in the Proposition,  and the rationale may have been simple bigotry or hostility,  which would go against constitutional rights to equality. 

The sponsors of California's same-sex marriage ban must hand over some internal campaign records to lawyers seeking to overturn the voter-enacted initiative, a federal judge in San Francisco ruled Thursday.

Denying a request to shield the information, U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn Walker said the Protect Marriage campaign had failed to show that providing private e-mails, memos and reports would inhibit the political activities of gay marriage opponents or subject them to unbridled harassment.

The judge agreed with lawyers for two unmarried same-sex couples who have sued to strike down the ban, known as Proposition 8, that confidential communications between the campaign's leaders and professional consultants could reveal a rationale for denying gays the right to wed that is relevant to the case.

The lawsuit argues that the measure was motivated by hostility toward gays and as such must be struck down as inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of equality.

"What was decided not to be said in a political campaign may cast light on what was actually said," Walker said.

At the same time, the judge said the couples' lawyers must limit their fact-finding request to cover only central issues and individuals, including Mormon and Catholic church representatives who served on the executive committee that oversaw the campaign. He also left open the possibility that he would restrict public access to the documents.

recommend Add a comment
0
Hugh Askew

Well, if this isn't a ruling from a totalitarian regime...or it's lackies, what is.

U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn Walker said the Protect Marriage campaign had failed to show that providing private e-mails, memos and reports would inhibit the political activities of gay marriage opponents or subject them to unbridled harassment.

....................confidential communications between the campaign's leaders and professional consultants could reveal a rationale for denying gays the right to wed that is relevant to the case.

if then someone proves that Obamacare is based on the premise that Barack hates capitalism, would that make it unconstitutional?


0
Roy C

Really a bad, bad decision.

Why I feel that California has gone to hell, and maybe even why it deserves to be there. That is just inquisitional. Period.

Look, legality is not morality. Reasons for doing something in the committee don't begin to address the why and wherefore of the vote banning gay marriage by the general populace, with overwhelming support among blacks and Asians, strong support among Hispanics and lukewarm support for whites.

The decision is virtually an act of psychosis by the judge.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Hugh Askew
First Flagged at 9:56 AM, Oct 4, 2009 by Hugh Askew
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (16)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from